首页/数据 & AI/karpathy-guidelines
K

karpathy-guidelines

by @forrestchangv
4.5(76)

遵循行为指南,有效减少LLM编码中的常见错误,提升代码质量。

andrej-karpathyllm-trainingneural-networksai-best-practicesdeep-learningGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills --skill karpathy-guidelines
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

编写LLM代码时,常因缺乏规范而引入常见错误,导致模型性能不佳或行为异常。调试困难,影响开发效率和模型质量。

使用后

遵循Karpathy的LLM编码指南,能有效减少常见错误。编写更健壮、可预测的LLM代码,提升模型开发效率和最终表现。

SKILL.md

Karpathy Guidelines

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
  • If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

2. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.

4. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量12.3K
评分4.5 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.5(76)
5
24%
4
50%
3
24%
2
3%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

时间线

创建2026年3月16日
最后更新2026年5月23日