首页/AI 智能体核心开发/agentic-engineering
A

agentic-engineering

by @affaan-mv
4.4(20)

运用智能体工程方法,通过“评估优先”执行策略,优化AI系统开发流程,提升模型性能与可靠性。

ai-agent-designmulti-agent-systemsautonomous-systemsagent-orchestrationllm-powered-agentsGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill agentic-engineering
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

传统工程方法在复杂AI任务中效率低下,缺乏系统性的评估、分解和协调机制,难以快速迭代和优化。

使用后

采用Agentic工程方法,通过评估优先、任务分解和协调,显著提升复杂AI任务的开发效率和解决方案质量。

SKILL.md

Agentic Engineering

Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.

Operating Principles

  1. Define completion criteria before execution.
  2. Decompose work into agent-sized units.
  3. Route model tiers by task complexity.
  4. Measure with evals and regression checks.

Eval-First Loop

  1. Define capability eval and regression eval.
  2. Run baseline and capture failure signatures.
  3. Execute implementation.
  4. Re-run evals and compare deltas.

Task Decomposition

Apply the 15-minute unit rule:

  • each unit should be independently verifiable
  • each unit should have a single dominant risk
  • each unit should expose a clear done condition

Model Routing

  • Haiku: classification, boilerplate transforms, narrow edits
  • Sonnet: implementation and refactors
  • Opus: architecture, root-cause analysis, multi-file invariants

Session Strategy

  • Continue session for closely-coupled units.
  • Start fresh session after major phase transitions.
  • Compact after milestone completion, not during active debugging.

Review Focus for AI-Generated Code

Prioritize:

  • invariants and edge cases
  • error boundaries
  • security and auth assumptions
  • hidden coupling and rollout risk

Do not waste review cycles on style-only disagreements when automated format/lint already enforce style.

Cost Discipline

Track per task:

  • model
  • token estimate
  • retries
  • wall-clock time
  • success/failure

Escalate model tier only when lower tier fails with a clear reasoning gap.

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量4.3K
评分4.4 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.4(20)
5
15%
4
45%
3
35%
2
5%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

时间线

创建2026年3月16日
最后更新2026年5月23日