首页/数据 & AI/diff-intake
D

diff-intake

by @amplitudev
4.7(120)

该 Skill 是数据分析埋点工作流的第一步,能够自动收集代码变更文件、分类并生成紧凑的 YAML 变更摘要,供下游事件发现与埋点技能使用。它帮助开发者快速定位用户可见的变更与相关界面,评估分析范围,大幅减少人工梳理 PR 或分支差异的时间,让产品分析团队更高效地决定埋点策略。

analyticsinstrumentationcode-diffpr-analysisyamlGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/amplitude/mcp-marketplace --skill diff-intake
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1 组
使用前

手动梳理 PR 或分支差异时,开发者需要逐一阅读 diff、分类文件并推断对埋点的影响,一个中等规模的 PR 往往耗时半小时以上,且容易遗漏关键变更。

使用后

此技能自动完成文件分类和变更摘要生成,几分钟内就能获得结构化的 YAML 简报,快速识别用户可见变化和分析范围,减少人为遗漏。

SKILL.md

diff-intake

Follow this skill step by step. You are step 1 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. Produce a compact YAML change brief that downstream skills (discover-event-surfaces, instrument-events) will consume. Keep the output machine-readable and precise — no prose around the YAML block.

Step 1: Gather changed files and categorize

Fetch the list of changed files from the source, then categorize each one.

Fetching changes

  • PR URL gh pr view <number-or-url> gh pr view <pr-number> --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.path)\t+\(.additions) -\(.deletions)\t"'
  • Branch comparison git log <main|master>..<branch> git diff --stat <main|master>..<branch>
  • Ambiguous mention (PR number, branch name): infer the right form and fetch without asking unless auth fails.

Categorize files

Assign each file to a category based on its path:

  • Core Logic: application source (e.g. src/auth/login.py, database/models.ts)
  • Generated: anything with generated in its path
  • Testing: test files
  • Config / Dependencies: package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.
  • Documentation: READMEs, docs/
  • Noise: lock-files, .svg, auto-generated migrations

For each file, record: path, category, change type (Added / Modified / Deleted), and analytics likelihood (1–5).

Step 2: Build the file summary map

Read every single Core Logic file and create the file summary map. Only process and include Core Logic files.

Fetching detailed diffs

  • PR gh pr view <number-or-url> --json baseRefOid,headRefOid Using the response, get a detailed diff git diff <baseRefOid>...<headRefOid> -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>
  • Branch comparison git diff main..feature/foo -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>

For each file, record

  • summary — 2-line summary of what changed
  • stack — frontend, backend, or shared

Also derive user-facing changes and touched surfaces

While reading the diff and the changed files, also produce the higher-level signals that downstream event discovery needs:

  • user_facing_changes — a flat list of concrete behavior changes that matter to a user, PM, or analyst. Each item should describe what a user can now do, see, or experience differently. Omit purely internal refactors.
  • surfaces.components — the UI components, routes, pages, handlers, or other interaction surfaces directly involved in those user-facing changes. Prefer likely instrumentation points over low-level helpers.

For each surface, record:

  • name — component, route, page, hook, or surface name
  • file — repo-relative path
  • change — added, modified, or deleted

If the change is backend-only or has no clear interactive surface, omit surfaces.components rather than inventing one.

Step 3: Classify the overall change

Infer the change type and analytics scope:

TypeAnalytics implication
featHigh — new surfaces likely need tracking
fixLow–Medium — may affect existing event conditions
refactorLow — tracking paths may move, regression risk
perfLow — usually no tracking impact
revertMedium — need to check what tracking was lost
style / docs / test / build / ci / choreNone — skip analytics analysis

analytics_scope = highest implication present:

  • none — only no-impact types
  • low — only perf/refactor
  • medium — fix
  • high — any feature or capability addition

If analytics_scope is none, emit the brief and note that downstream skills are not needed.

Step 4: Emit the YAML brief

Output only the YAML block — no prose before or after. Follow the format exactly. List each file individually in file_summary_map (no globs).

change_brief:
  classification:
    primary: feat           # dominant conventional commit type
    types: [feat, fix]      # all types detected
    analytics_scope: high   # none | low | medium | high
    stack: frontend         # frontend | backend | fullstack
  summary: "One sentence describing the overall change"
  user_facing_changes:
    - "Users can now upload an avatar with drag-and-drop and preview it before saving."
  surfaces:
    components:
      - name: "AvatarUpload"
        file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
        change: modified
  file_summary_map:         # each entry includes a layer field
    - file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
      summary: "New component for avatar upload with drag-and-drop and preview"
      layer: frontend       # frontend | backend | shared
    - file: "src/api/upload.ts"
      summary: "Upload endpoint handler, validates file type and persists to S3"
      layer: backend

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量40.9K
评分4.7 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年10月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.7(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🤖claude-code

时间线

创建2026年8月23日
最后更新2026年10月23日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷