T
trading-wisdom
by @0xhubedv
4.2(20)
应用从Agent Arena竞赛中学到的核心交易洞察,辅助任何交易决策。
安装方式
npx skills add 0xhubed/agent-trading-arena --skill trading-wisdomcompare_arrows
Before / After 效果对比
1 组使用前
在复杂的市场环境中,个人交易决策常受情绪和有限信息影响,难以系统性地评估风险与回报,导致投资表现波动较大。
使用后
借助Agent Arena的交易洞察,我能更理性地分析市场趋势,制定基于数据的交易策略。这显著提升了决策的准确性,降低了盲目性。
SKILL.md
Trading Wisdom
Last updated: 2026-01-17 20:31 UTC Active patterns: 206 Total samples: 41088 Confidence threshold: 60%
Key Learnings
- CRITICAL: In moderate bull markets (4/5 assets positive), ALL active trading strategies lost money while zero-trade strategies preserved capital perfectly.
- Trade frequency is inversely correlated with performance in this regime: 0 trades = $0 loss, 23 trades = -$28.69, 243 trades = -$229.00.
- Technical analysis signals (multi-timeframe alignment, MACD, RSI, SMA) failed to predict direction for both long and short entries in this moderate bull environment.
- Asset selection mattered significantly: BNB (+2.03%) vs SOL (-0.09%). Agents fixating on SOL 'uptrend' (llama4_scout) suffered worst losses.
- Validation frameworks and risk management rules do not prevent losses when the fundamental market direction assessment is wrong.
- High-confidence decisions (0.85-0.90) on directional trades were frequently wrong, suggesting confidence calibration issues across all active agents.
- The only reliable pattern was proactive loss-cutting with high confidence (0.85-0.95) to limit drawdown.
Winning Strategies
Zero-trade strategy in moderate bull markets prese...
- Confidence: 95%
- Total samples: 4
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Zero-trade strategy in moderate bull markets preserves capital perfectly. Agents that made 0 trades (learning_qwen, gpt_simple, qwen3_235b, index_fund) achieved $0.00 PnL while all active traders lost money despite BNB +2.03%, ETH +1.02%, DOGE +1.07% gains.
Zero-trade strategies preserve capital in mixed/ch...
- Confidence: 92%
- Total samples: 771
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Zero-trade strategies preserve capital in mixed/choppy markets. learning_qwen, gpt_simple, and index_fund made 0 trades and achieved $0.00 PnL, outperforming all active traders in this low-conviction environment.
Zero-trade strategy preserves capital in moderatel...
- Confidence: 92%
- Total samples: 4
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Zero-trade strategy preserves capital in moderately bullish markets where active trading leads to losses. Agents holding no positions avoided the -$50 to -$264 losses seen by active traders despite market being up +0.63% to +2.15%.
Close losing positions proactively with high confi...
- Confidence: 90%
- Total samples: 368
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Close losing positions proactively with high confidence (0.8-0.9) to free margin and limit drawdowns. Multiple agents demonstrated this: gptoss_20b_simple closing SOL at -$4.76 loss, agentic_gptoss closing DOGE 'largest loss percentage'.
Minimal trading with high selectivity outperforms ...
- Confidence: 88%
- Total samples: 257
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Minimal trading with high selectivity outperforms frequent trading. qwen3_235b made only 2 trades with PnL of -$0.29, dramatically outperforming agents with 140-201 trades.
Closing long positions with high confidence (0.92)...
- Confidence: 88%
- Total samples: 89
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Closing long positions with high confidence (0.92) when regime shifts to 'moderate bearish' preserves capital. skill_only_oss reasoning: 'risk-management rules advise limiting exposure and closing long positions to preserve capital'.
Minimal trading frequency (23 trades) with technic...
- Confidence: 88%
- Total samples: 1
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Minimal trading frequency (23 trades) with technical analysis baseline outperforms high-frequency approaches. ta_baseline lost only $-28.69 vs llama4_scout's $-229.00 with 243 trades.
Explicit risk validation with 2% equity risk and 2...
- Confidence: 85%
- Total samples: 160
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Explicit risk validation with 2% equity risk and 2:1 reward ratio combined with position closing discipline. skill_only_oss achieved best active trader performance (-$17.96) with 160 trades, using validated risk parameters.
Agentic approach with active position management: ...
- Confidence: 85%
- Total samples: 100
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-16
- Details: Agentic approach with active position management: opening shorts in bearish markets, closing positions to lock gains when technical indicators confirm trend reversal. Uses SMA crossover + MACD + Bollinger bands for entry/exit confirmation with explicit validation steps.
Low-frequency trading (89 trades) with selective l...
- Confidence: 85%
- Total samples: 89
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Low-frequency trading (89 trades) with selective long entries on multi-timeframe bullish alignment produces small positive returns (+$6.22) in moderately bullish markets.
Proactive closing of losing positions with high co...
- Confidence: 85%
- Total samples: 5
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-17
- Details: Proactive closing of losing positions with high confidence (0.85-0.95) to free margin. skill_only_oss closed DOGEUSDT at 0.95 confidence citing 'risk-management rule recommends closing losing positions proactively' - resulted in smaller losses ($-36.63) than more active traders.
Zero-trade or minimal-trade strategies preserve ca...
- Confidence: 82%
- Total samples: 136
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-16
- Details: Zero-trade or minimal-trade strategies preserve capital in bearish/declining markets. learning_qwen (0 trades, $0 PnL) and gpt_simple (1 trade, $0 PnL) avoided losses by not trading during market decline.
Multi-timeframe bullish alignment (15m, 1h, 4h) co...
- Confidence: 79%
- Total samples: 328
- Times confirmed: 2
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Multi-timeframe bullish alignment (15m, 1h, 4h) combined with explicit risk validation (2% equity risk, 2:1 reward ratio) and trade validation checks produces strong positive returns in trending bull markets
Moderate trade frequency (80-90 trades) with expli...
- Confidence: 78%
- Total samples: 88
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-16
- Details: Moderate trade frequency (80-90 trades) with explicit risk validation outperforms high-frequency trading. skill_only_oss (88 trades, -$9.15) significantly outperformed skill_aware_oss (103 trades, -$180.47) despite similar strategies.
Optimal trade frequency in trending bull markets: ...
- Confidence: 75%
- Total samples: 543
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Optimal trade frequency in trending bull markets: 120-200 trades/24h captures opportunities without excessive churn. skill_aware_oss (164 trades, +$1236.81) and agentic_gptoss (184 trades, +$697.86) demonstrate this
Active position management with proactive closing ...
- Confidence: 74%
- Total samples: 543
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Active position management with proactive closing of losing/breakeven positions to free margin, combined with moderate-high trade frequency (164-195 trades/24h) in trending markets
Moderate-high trade frequency (120-200 trades/24h)...
- Confidence: 73%
- Total samples: 543
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Moderate-high trade frequency (120-200 trades/24h) with active position management - closing small/underwater positions to free margin for higher-conviction trades
Proactive loss management - closing losing positio...
- Confidence: 72%
- Total samples: 379
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Proactive loss management - closing losing positions with high confidence (0.9) to preserve capital and reduce concentration risk
SMA crossover + bullish MACD + neutral Bollinger b...
- Confidence: 72%
- Total samples: 184
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: SMA crossover + bullish MACD + neutral Bollinger bands as entry confirmation with explicit validation checks before execution
Closing positions near breakeven or with small los...
- Confidence: 70%
- Total samples: 320
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Closing positions near breakeven or with small losses to free margin for higher-conviction trades preserves capital and enables redeployment
SMA crossover + bullish MACD + neutral Bollinger b...
- Confidence: 70%
- Total samples: 184
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: SMA crossover + bullish MACD + neutral Bollinger bands as entry confirmation combined with trend alignment across timeframes
Multi-timeframe bullish alignment (15m, 1h, 4h) co...
- Confidence: 70%
- Total samples: 164
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Multi-timeframe bullish alignment (15m, 1h, 4h) combined with explicit risk validation (2% risk, 2:1 reward ratio) and position sizing controls produces strong profits in trending markets. skill_aware_oss consistently references 'Multi-timeframe analysis shows strong aligned bullish trend' with 'trade validation passed' and achieved +$1379.66 PnL.
Position sizing at 25% equity limit per position w...
- Confidence: 68%
- Total samples: 125
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Position sizing at 25% equity limit per position with active monitoring and timely closes to lock profits or limit losses
Agentic workflow with validation checks before ent...
- Confidence: 67%
- Total samples: 184
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Agentic workflow with validation checks before entry/exit decisions. agentic_gptoss uses 'validation checks confirm', 'risk calculator suggests', and 'all validation checks passed' reasoning, achieving +$689.63 with 184 trades. Structured decision-making with explicit risk/reward assessment outperforms simpler approaches.
Moderate trade frequency (120-200 trades/24h) in t...
- Confidence: 65%
- Total samples: 545
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Moderate trade frequency (120-200 trades/24h) in trending bull markets captures momentum while avoiding overtrading. gptoss_120b_simple (197 trades, +$138.86) and agentic_gptoss (184 trades, +$689.63) both fall in this range and are profitable.
Proactive position closing to manage risk and free...
- Confidence: 63%
- Total samples: 200
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Proactive position closing to manage risk and free margin. Profitable agents close positions citing 'frees margin', 'reduces concentration risk', 'locks profit'. skill_aware_oss closes 'over-leveraged' positions; agentic_gptoss closes with 'reduces exposure and frees capital for future opportunities'.
skill_aware_oss combines multi-timeframe analysis ...
- Confidence: 62%
- Total samples: 157
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: skill_aware_oss combines multi-timeframe analysis with strict risk validation and position scaling into existing winners. Uses 0.75-0.85 confidence threshold with explicit risk checks ('risk per trade within limits', 'validation permits proceeding'). Achieves highest PnL ($1349.11) with moderate trade frequency (157 trades).
Asset diversification across multiple symbols rath...
- Confidence: 60%
- Total samples: 348
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Asset diversification across multiple symbols rather than single-asset concentration. Profitable agents trade BTC, ETH, DOGE across decisions while llama4_scout's repetitive single-asset focus leads to losses despite high trade count.
agentic_gptoss employs active loss-cutting strateg...
- Confidence: 58%
- Total samples: 182
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: agentic_gptoss employs active loss-cutting strategy with high-confidence closes (0.9) on losing positions ('Close the losing ETHUSDT long to free margin'). Combines with selective long entries. Achieves $372.23 PnL with 182 trades.
In trending bull markets (+1.5% to +5% moves), mul...
- Confidence: 58%
- Total samples: 157
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: In trending bull markets (+1.5% to +5% moves), multi-timeframe bullish alignment DOES work when combined with proper risk validation. skill_aware_oss profits $1349 using this approach during 3-5% market moves.
Moderate trade frequency (120-200 trades) with dis...
- Confidence: 55%
- Total samples: 535
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Moderate trade frequency (120-200 trades) with disciplined position management outperforms both extremes. Winners trade 157-196 times vs losers at 248 trades or 2-4 trades.
Ultra-low trade frequency (3-6 trades) with high s...
- Confidence: 52%
- Total samples: 13
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-13
- Details: Ultra-low trade frequency (3-6 trades) with high selectivity results in near-zero or minimal losses in flat/sideways markets - qwen3_235b and learning_qwen both achieved ~$0 PnL with only 3-4 trades vs massive losses from high-frequency traders
Active closing of near-breakeven or small-loss pos...
- Confidence: 52%
- Total samples: 317
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-14
- Details: Active closing of near-breakeven or small-loss positions to free margin for higher-conviction opportunities. gptoss_120b_simple reasoning: 'closing reduces exposure and frees margin for higher-conviction opportunities'.
Index fund strategy of equal-weight allocation ($2...
- Confidence: 50%
- Total samples: 6
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-13
- Details: Index fund strategy of equal-weight allocation ($2000 per asset) with confidence 1.0 and minimal rebalancing preserves capital in sideways markets - achieved $0.00 PnL while active traders lost $1395
Passive holding without frequent position changes ...
- Confidence: 48%
- Total samples: 13
- Times confirmed: 1
- First seen: 2026-01-13
- Details: Passive holding without frequent position changes outperforms active trading when market moves are <0.1% - agents with <10 trades preserved capital while those with >100 trades lost $300-$580
Index fund strategy of equal-weight allocation ($2...
- Confidence: 40%
- Total samples: 6
- Times confirmed:
...
用户评价 (0)
发表评价
效果
易用性
文档
兼容性
暂无评价
统计数据
安装量665
评分4.2 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月23日
对比案例1 组
用户评分
4.2(20)
5
15%
4
45%
3
35%
2
5%
1
0%
为此 Skill 评分
0.0
兼容平台
🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI
时间线
创建2026年3月16日
最后更新2026年5月23日