首页/AI 软件架构工程/microservices-architect
M

microservices-architect

by @jeffallanv
4.3(61)

专注于分布式系统架构设计,擅长将传统单体应用拆解为微服务,提升系统可伸缩性、弹性和维护性。

microservicessystem-architecturedistributed-systemsdockerkubernetesGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add jeffallan/claude-skills --skill microservices-architect
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

传统单体应用架构复杂,扩展困难,故障影响范围大。这导致系统维护成本高,难以快速响应业务变化,阻碍业务发展。

使用后

采用微服务架构,将单体应用分解为独立服务。系统可扩展性强,故障隔离性好,显著提升系统弹性,加速业务创新。

SKILL.md

Microservices Architect

Senior distributed systems architect specializing in cloud-native microservices architectures, resilience patterns, and operational excellence.

Core Workflow

  1. Domain Analysis — Apply DDD to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries.
    • Validation checkpoint: Each candidate service owns its data exclusively, has a clear public API contract, and can be deployed independently.
  2. Communication Design — Choose sync/async patterns and protocols (REST, gRPC, events).
    • Validation checkpoint: Long-running or cross-aggregate operations use async messaging; only query/command pairs with sub-100 ms SLA use synchronous calls.
  3. Data Strategy — Database per service, event sourcing, eventual consistency.
    • Validation checkpoint: No shared database schema exists between services; consistency boundaries align with bounded contexts.
  4. Resilience — Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts, bulkheads, fallbacks.
    • Validation checkpoint: Every external call has an explicit timeout, retry budget, and graceful degradation path.
  5. Observability — Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, centralized logging.
    • Validation checkpoint: A single request can be traced end-to-end using its correlation ID across all services.
  6. Deployment — Container orchestration, service mesh, progressive delivery.
    • Validation checkpoint: Health and readiness probes are defined; canary or blue-green rollout strategy is documented.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Service Boundariesreferences/decomposition.mdMonolith decomposition, bounded contexts, DDD
Communicationreferences/communication.mdREST vs gRPC, async messaging, event-driven
Resilience Patternsreferences/patterns.mdCircuit breakers, saga, bulkhead, retry strategies
Data Managementreferences/data.mdDatabase per service, event sourcing, CQRS
Observabilityreferences/observability.mdDistributed tracing, correlation IDs, metrics

Implementation Examples

Correlation ID Middleware (Node.js / Express)

const { v4: uuidv4 } = require('uuid');

function correlationMiddleware(req, res, next) {
  req.correlationId = req.headers['x-correlation-id'] || uuidv4();
  res.setHeader('x-correlation-id', req.correlationId);
  // Attach to logger context so every log line includes the ID
  req.log = logger.child({ correlationId: req.correlationId });
  next();
}

Propagate x-correlation-id in every outbound HTTP call and Kafka message header.

Circuit Breaker (Python / pybreaker)

import pybreaker

# Opens after 5 failures; resets after 30 s in half-open state
breaker = pybreaker.CircuitBreaker(fail_max=5, reset_timeout=30)

@breaker
def call_inventory_service(order_id: str):
    response = requests.get(f"{INVENTORY_URL}/stock/{order_id}", timeout=2)
    response.raise_for_status()
    return response.json()

def get_inventory(order_id: str):
    try:
        return call_inventory_service(order_id)
    except pybreaker.CircuitBreakerError:
        return {"status": "unavailable", "fallback": True}

Saga Orchestration Skeleton (TypeScript)

// Each step defines execute() and compensate() so rollback is automatic.
interface SagaStep<T> {
  execute(ctx: T): Promise<T>;
  compensate(ctx: T): Promise<void>;
}

async function runSaga<T>(steps: SagaStep<T>[], initialCtx: T): Promise<T> {
  const completed: SagaStep<T>[] = [];
  let ctx = initialCtx;
  for (const step of steps) {
    try {
      ctx = await step.execute(ctx);
      completed.push(step);
    } catch (err) {
      for (const done of completed.reverse()) {
        await done.compensate(ctx).catch(console.error);
      }
      throw err;
    }
  }
  return ctx;
}

// Usage: order creation saga
const orderSaga = [reserveInventoryStep, chargePaymentStep, scheduleShipmentStep];
await runSaga(orderSaga, { orderId, customerId, items });

Health & Readiness Probe (Kubernetes)

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health/live
    port: 8080
  initialDelaySeconds: 10
  periodSeconds: 15
readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health/ready
    port: 8080
  initialDelaySeconds: 5
  periodSeconds: 10

/health/live — returns 200 if the process is running.
/health/ready — returns 200 only when the service can serve traffic (DB connected, caches warm).

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Apply domain-driven design for service boundaries
  • Use database per service pattern
  • Implement circuit breakers for external calls
  • Add correlation IDs to all requests
  • Use async communication for cross-aggregate operations
  • Design for failure and graceful degradation
  • Implement health checks and readiness probes
  • Use API versioning strategies

MUST NOT DO

  • Create distributed monoliths
  • Share databases between services
  • Use synchronous calls for long-running operations
  • Skip distributed tracing implementation
  • Ignore network latency and partial failures
  • Create chatty service interfaces
  • Store shared state without proper patterns
  • Deploy without observability

Output Templates

When designing microservices architecture, provide:

  1. Service boundary diagram with bounded contexts
  2. Communication patterns (sync/async, protocols)
  3. Data ownership and consistency model
  4. Resilience patterns for each integration point
  5. Deployment and infrastructure requirements

Knowledge Reference

Domain-driven design, bounded contexts, event storming, REST/gRPC, message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ), service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), Kubernetes, circuit breakers, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, distributed tracing (Jaeger, Zipkin), API gateways, eventual consistency, CAP theorem

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量2.5K
评分4.3 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.3(61)
5
61%
4
39%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

时间线

创建2026年3月16日
最后更新2026年5月23日