首页/金融与投资/investor-materials
I

investor-materials

by @affaan-mv
4.4(20)

专注于创建和更新投资者材料,如演示文稿、一页纸概览和投资者备忘录,确保信息清晰专业,吸引潜在投资。

investor-presentationsfinancial-documentspitch-deckdue-diligenceinvestment-strategyGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill investor-materials
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

准备投资人路演材料时,常因缺乏专业设计和内容组织能力,导致演示文稿平庸,未能充分展示项目潜力。

使用后

运用投资者材料制作技能,我能高效创建高质量的演示文稿和备忘录。这显著提升了项目吸引力,增加了获得投资的机会。

SKILL.md

Investor Materials

Build investor-facing materials that are consistent, credible, and easy to defend.

When to Activate

  • creating or revising a pitch deck
  • writing an investor memo or one-pager
  • building a financial model, milestone plan, or use-of-funds table
  • answering accelerator or incubator application questions
  • aligning multiple fundraising docs around one source of truth

Golden Rule

All investor materials must agree with each other.

Create or confirm a single source of truth before writing:

  • traction metrics
  • pricing and revenue assumptions
  • raise size and instrument
  • use of funds
  • team bios and titles
  • milestones and timelines

If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting.

Core Workflow

  1. inventory the canonical facts
  2. identify missing assumptions
  3. choose the asset type
  4. draft the asset with explicit logic
  5. cross-check every number against the source of truth

Asset Guidance

Pitch Deck

Recommended flow:

  1. company + wedge
  2. problem
  3. solution
  4. product / demo
  5. market
  6. business model
  7. traction
  8. team
  9. competition / differentiation
  10. ask
  11. use of funds / milestones
  12. appendix

If the user wants a web-native deck, pair this skill with frontend-slides.

One-Pager / Memo

  • state what the company does in one clean sentence
  • show why now
  • include traction and proof points early
  • make the ask precise
  • keep claims easy to verify

Financial Model

Include:

  • explicit assumptions
  • bear / base / bull cases when useful
  • clean layer-by-layer revenue logic
  • milestone-linked spending
  • sensitivity analysis where the decision hinges on assumptions

Accelerator Applications

  • answer the exact question asked
  • prioritize traction, insight, and team advantage
  • avoid puffery
  • keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model

Red Flags to Avoid

  • unverifiable claims
  • fuzzy market sizing without assumptions
  • inconsistent team roles or titles
  • revenue math that does not sum cleanly
  • inflated certainty where assumptions are fragile

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • every number matches the current source of truth
  • use of funds and revenue layers sum correctly
  • assumptions are visible, not buried
  • the story is clear without hype language
  • the final asset is defensible in a partner meeting

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量4.0K
评分4.4 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月21日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.4(20)
5
15%
4
45%
3
35%
2
5%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

时间线

创建2026年3月16日
最后更新2026年5月21日