I
investor-materials
by @affaan-mv
4.4(20)
专注于创建和更新投资者材料,如演示文稿、一页纸概览和投资者备忘录,确保信息清晰专业,吸引潜在投资。
安装方式
npx skills add affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill investor-materialscompare_arrows
Before / After 效果对比
1 组使用前
准备投资人路演材料时,常因缺乏专业设计和内容组织能力,导致演示文稿平庸,未能充分展示项目潜力。
使用后
运用投资者材料制作技能,我能高效创建高质量的演示文稿和备忘录。这显著提升了项目吸引力,增加了获得投资的机会。
SKILL.md
Investor Materials
Build investor-facing materials that are consistent, credible, and easy to defend.
When to Activate
- creating or revising a pitch deck
- writing an investor memo or one-pager
- building a financial model, milestone plan, or use-of-funds table
- answering accelerator or incubator application questions
- aligning multiple fundraising docs around one source of truth
Golden Rule
All investor materials must agree with each other.
Create or confirm a single source of truth before writing:
- traction metrics
- pricing and revenue assumptions
- raise size and instrument
- use of funds
- team bios and titles
- milestones and timelines
If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting.
Core Workflow
- inventory the canonical facts
- identify missing assumptions
- choose the asset type
- draft the asset with explicit logic
- cross-check every number against the source of truth
Asset Guidance
Pitch Deck
Recommended flow:
- company + wedge
- problem
- solution
- product / demo
- market
- business model
- traction
- team
- competition / differentiation
- ask
- use of funds / milestones
- appendix
If the user wants a web-native deck, pair this skill with frontend-slides.
One-Pager / Memo
- state what the company does in one clean sentence
- show why now
- include traction and proof points early
- make the ask precise
- keep claims easy to verify
Financial Model
Include:
- explicit assumptions
- bear / base / bull cases when useful
- clean layer-by-layer revenue logic
- milestone-linked spending
- sensitivity analysis where the decision hinges on assumptions
Accelerator Applications
- answer the exact question asked
- prioritize traction, insight, and team advantage
- avoid puffery
- keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model
Red Flags to Avoid
- unverifiable claims
- fuzzy market sizing without assumptions
- inconsistent team roles or titles
- revenue math that does not sum cleanly
- inflated certainty where assumptions are fragile
Quality Gate
Before delivering:
- every number matches the current source of truth
- use of funds and revenue layers sum correctly
- assumptions are visible, not buried
- the story is clear without hype language
- the final asset is defensible in a partner meeting
用户评价 (0)
发表评价
效果
易用性
文档
兼容性
暂无评价
统计数据
安装量4.0K
评分4.4 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月21日
对比案例1 组
用户评分
4.4(20)
5
15%
4
45%
3
35%
2
5%
1
0%
为此 Skill 评分
0.0
兼容平台
🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI
时间线
创建2026年3月16日
最后更新2026年5月21日