D
dotnet-design-pattern-review
by @githubv
4.5(304)
审查C#/.NET代码中的设计模式实现,并提出改进建议,提升代码质量。
安装方式
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill dotnet-design-pattern-reviewcompare_arrows
Before / After 效果对比
1 组使用前
没有此技能时,C#/.NET代码中的设计模式实现可能存在缺陷,难以发现潜在问题。这导致代码质量下降,维护成本高昂,团队成员难以理解复杂逻辑。
使用后
使用此技能后,能自动审查设计模式实现,并获得具体改进建议。代码质量显著提升,可维护性增强,团队协作效率也大幅提高,项目进展更顺畅。
SKILL.md
.NET/C# Design Pattern Review
Review the C#/.NET code in ${selection} for design pattern implementation and suggest improvements for the solution/project. Do not make any changes to the code, just provide a review.
Required Design Patterns
- Command Pattern: Generic base classes (
CommandHandler<TOptions>),ICommandHandler<TOptions>interface,CommandHandlerOptionsinheritance, staticSetupCommand(IHost host)methods - Factory Pattern: Complex object creation service provider integration
- Dependency Injection: Primary constructor syntax,
ArgumentNullExceptionnull checks, interface abstractions, proper service lifetimes - Repository Pattern: Async data access interfaces provider abstractions for connections
- Provider Pattern: External service abstractions (database, AI), clear contracts, configuration handling
- Resource Pattern: ResourceManager for localized messages, separate .resx files (LogMessages, ErrorMessages)
Review Checklist
- Design Patterns: Identify patterns used. Are Command Handler, Factory, Provider, and Repository patterns correctly implemented? Missing beneficial patterns?
- Architecture: Follow namespace conventions (
{Core|Console|App|Service}.{Feature})? Proper separation between Core/Console projects? Modular and readable? - .NET Best Practices: Primary constructors, async/await with Task returns, ResourceManager usage, structured logging, strongly-typed configuration?
- GoF Patterns: Command, Factory, Template Method, Strategy patterns correctly implemented?
- SOLID Principles: Single Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, Dependency Inversion violations?
- Performance: Proper async/await, resource disposal, ConfigureAwait(false), parallel processing opportunities?
- Maintainability: Clear separation of concerns, consistent error handling, proper configuration usage?
- Testability: Dependencies abstracted via interfaces, mockable components, async testability, AAA pattern compatibility?
- Security: Input validation, secure credential handling, parameterized queries, safe exception handling?
- Documentation: XML docs for public APIs, parameter/return descriptions, resource file organization?
- Code Clarity: Meaningful names reflecting domain concepts, clear intent through patterns, self-explanatory structure?
- Clean Code: Consistent style, appropriate method/class size, minimal complexity, eliminated duplication?
Improvement Focus Areas
- Command Handlers: Validation in base class, consistent error handling, proper resource management
- Factories: Dependency configuration, service provider integration, disposal patterns
- Providers: Connection management, async patterns, exception handling and logging
- Configuration: Data annotations, validation attributes, secure sensitive value handling
- AI/ML Integration: Semantic Kernel patterns, structured output handling, model configuration
Provide specific, actionable recommendations for improvements aligned with the project's architecture and .NET best practices.
用户评价 (0)
发表评价
效果
易用性
文档
兼容性
暂无评价
统计数据
安装量9.9K
评分4.5 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月22日
对比案例1 组
用户评分
4.5(304)
5
23%
4
51%
3
23%
2
2%
1
0%
为此 Skill 评分
0.0
兼容平台
🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI
时间线
创建2026年3月16日
最后更新2026年5月22日