首页/AI 代码生成与质效/python-anti-patterns
P

python-anti-patterns

by @wshobsonv
4.5(70)

识别并避免Python后端开发中的反模式,通过智能自动化和多智能体编排,提升代码质量和可维护性。

pythonanti-patternscode-smellsrefactoringclean-codeGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add wshobson/agents --skill python-anti-patterns
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

Python后端开发中若不注意反模式,代码将变得臃肿、难以理解和维护,性能低下,且易引入新的bug,阻碍项目长期发展。

使用后

通过识别并避免Python反模式,结合智能自动化,团队能编写出更简洁、高效、易于扩展和维护的代码,显著提升项目质量。

SKILL.md

python-anti-patterns

Python Anti-Patterns Checklist

A reference checklist of common mistakes and anti-patterns in Python code. Review this before finalizing implementations to catch issues early.

When to Use This Skill

  • Reviewing code before merge

  • Debugging mysterious issues

  • Teaching or learning Python best practices

  • Establishing team coding standards

  • Refactoring legacy code

Note: This skill focuses on what to avoid. For guidance on positive patterns and architecture, see the python-design-patterns skill.

Infrastructure Anti-Patterns

Scattered Timeout/Retry Logic

# BAD: Timeout logic duplicated everywhere
def fetch_user(user_id):
    try:
        return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
    except Timeout:
        logger.warning("Timeout fetching user")
        return None

def fetch_orders(user_id):
    try:
        return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
    except Timeout:
        logger.warning("Timeout fetching orders")
        return None

Fix: Centralize in decorators or client wrappers.

# GOOD: Centralized retry logic
@retry(stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential())
def http_get(url: str) -> Response:
    return requests.get(url, timeout=30)

Double Retry

# BAD: Retrying at multiple layers
@retry(max_attempts=3)  # Application retry
def call_service():
    return client.request()  # Client also has retry configured!

Fix: Retry at one layer only. Know your infrastructure's retry behavior.

Hard-Coded Configuration

# BAD: Secrets and config in code
DB_HOST = "prod-db.example.com"
API_KEY = "sk-12345"

def connect():
    return psycopg.connect(f"host={DB_HOST}...")

Fix: Use environment variables with typed settings.

# GOOD
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings

class Settings(BaseSettings):
    db_host: str = Field(alias="DB_HOST")
    api_key: str = Field(alias="API_KEY")

settings = Settings()

Architecture Anti-Patterns

Exposed Internal Types

# BAD: Leaking ORM model to API
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserModel:  # SQLAlchemy model
    return db.query(UserModel).get(id)

Fix: Use DTOs/response models.

# GOOD
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserResponse:
    user = db.query(UserModel).get(id)
    return UserResponse.from_orm(user)

Mixed I/O and Business Logic

# BAD: SQL embedded in business logic
def calculate_discount(user_id: str) -> float:
    user = db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", user_id)
    orders = db.query("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?", user_id)
    # Business logic mixed with data access
    if len(orders) > 10:
        return 0.15
    return 0.0

Fix: Repository pattern. Keep business logic pure.

# GOOD
def calculate_discount(user: User, orders: list[Order]) -> float:
    # Pure business logic, easily testable
    if len(orders) > 10:
        return 0.15
    return 0.0

Error Handling Anti-Patterns

Bare Exception Handling

# BAD: Swallowing all exceptions
try:
    process()
except Exception:
    pass  # Silent failure - bugs hidden forever

Fix: Catch specific exceptions. Log or handle appropriately.

# GOOD
try:
    process()
except ConnectionError as e:
    logger.warning("Connection failed, will retry", error=str(e))
    raise
except ValueError as e:
    logger.error("Invalid input", error=str(e))
    raise BadRequestError(str(e))

Ignored Partial Failures

# BAD: Stops on first error
def process_batch(items):
    results = []
    for item in items:
        result = process(item)  # Raises on error - batch aborted
        results.append(result)
    return results

Fix: Capture both successes and failures.

# GOOD
def process_batch(items) -> BatchResult:
    succeeded = {}
    failed = {}
    for idx, item in enumerate(items):
        try:
            succeeded[idx] = process(item)
        except Exception as e:
            failed[idx] = e
    return BatchResult(succeeded, failed)

Missing Input Validation

# BAD: No validation
def create_user(data: dict):
    return User(**data)  # Crashes deep in code on bad input

Fix: Validate early at API boundaries.

# GOOD
def create_user(data: dict) -> User:
    validated = CreateUserInput.model_validate(data)
    return User.from_input(validated)

Resource Anti-Patterns

Unclosed Resources

# BAD: File never closed
def read_file(path):
    f = open(path)
    return f.read()  # What if this raises?

Fix: Use context managers.

# GOOD
def read_file(path):
    with open(path) as f:
        return f.read()

Blocking in Async

# BAD: Blocks the entire event loop
async def fetch_data():
    time.sleep(1)  # Blocks everything!
    response = requests.get(url)  # Also blocks!

Fix: Use async-native libraries.

# GOOD
async def fetch_data():
    await asyncio.sleep(1)
    async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
        response = await client.get(url)

Type Safety Anti-Patterns

Missing Type Hints

# BAD: No types
def process(data):
    return data["value"] * 2

Fix: Annotate all public functions.

# GOOD
def process(data: dict[str, int]) -> int:
    return data["value"] * 2

Untyped Collections

# BAD: Generic list without type parameter
def get_users() -> list:
    ...

Fix: Use type parameters.

# GOOD
def get_users() -> list[User]:
    ...

Testing Anti-Patterns

Only Testing Happy Paths

# BAD: Only tests success case
def test_create_user():
    user = service.create_user(valid_data)
    assert user.id is not None

Fix: Test error conditions and edge cases.

# GOOD
def test_create_user_success():
    user = service.create_user(valid_data)
    assert user.id is not None

def test_create_user_invalid_email():
    with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid email"):
        service.create_user(invalid_email_data)

def test_create_user_duplicate_email():
    service.create_user(valid_data)
    with pytest.raises(ConflictError):
        service.create_user(valid_data)

Over-Mocking

# BAD: Mocking everything
def test_user_service():
    mock_repo = Mock()
    mock_cache = Mock()
    mock_logger = Mock()
    mock_metrics = Mock()
    # Test doesn't verify real behavior

Fix: Use integration tests for critical paths. Mock only external services.

Quick Review Checklist

Before finalizing code, verify:

  • No scattered timeout/retry logic (centralized)

  • No double retry (app + infrastructure)

  • No hard-coded configuration or secrets

  • No exposed internal types (ORM models, protobufs)

  • No mixed I/O and business logic

  • No bare except Exception: pass

  • No ignored partial failures in batches

  • No missing input validation

  • No unclosed resources (using context managers)

  • No blocking calls in async code

  • All public functions have type hints

  • Collections have type parameters

  • Error paths are tested

  • Edge cases are covered

Common Fixes Summary

Anti-Pattern Fix

Scattered retry logic Centralized decorators

Hard-coded config Environment variables + pydantic-settings

Exposed ORM models DTO/response schemas

Mixed I/O + logic Repository pattern

Bare except Catch specific exceptions

Batch stops on error Return BatchResult with successes/failures

No validation Validate at boundaries with Pydantic

Unclosed resources Context managers

Blocking in async Async-native libraries

Missing types Type annotations on all public APIs

Only happy path tests Test errors and edge cases

Weekly Installs3.0KRepositorywshobson/agentsGitHub Stars31.5KFirst SeenJan 30, 2026Security AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled onopencode2.4Kgemini-cli2.4Kcodex2.3Kclaude-code2.2Kgithub-copilot2.1Kcursor2.0K

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量7.3K
评分4.5 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.5(70)
5
23%
4
51%
3
23%
2
3%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

时间线

创建2026年3月17日
最后更新2026年5月23日