首页/营销与增长/create-an-asset
C

create-an-asset

by @anthropicsv
4.4(20)

创建资产技能,根据潜在客户、受众和目标生成定制的销售资产,支持交互式落地页、演示文稿和高管单页等。

content-creationdigital-assetsgraphic-designmultimedia-productionbrandingGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill create-an-asset
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1 组
使用前

手动创建销售资产(如落地页、演示文稿)耗时且难以针对每个潜在客户进行高度定制,导致销售转化率不高。

使用后

通过 AI 辅助生成定制化的销售资产,包括交互式落地页、演示文稿和工作流演示,可以快速响应客户需求,显著提升销售效率和转化率。

SKILL.md

create-an-asset

Create an Asset Generate custom sales assets tailored to your prospect, audience, and goals. Supports interactive landing pages, presentation decks, executive one-pagers, and workflow/architecture demos. Triggers Invoke this skill when: User says /create-an-asset or /create-an-asset [CompanyName] User asks to "create an asset", "build a demo", "make a landing page", "mock up a workflow" User needs a customer-facing deliverable for a sales conversation Overview This skill creates professional sales assets by gathering context about: (a) The Prospect — company, contacts, conversations, pain points (b) The Audience — who's viewing, what they care about (c) The Purpose — goal of the asset, desired next action (d) The Format — landing page, deck, one-pager, or workflow demo The skill then researches, structures, and builds a polished, branded asset ready to share with customers. Phase 0: Context Detection & Input Collection Step 0.1: Detect Seller Context From the user's email domain, identify what company they work for. Actions: Extract domain from user's email Search: "[domain]" company products services site:linkedin.com OR site:crunchbase.com Determine seller context: Scenario Action Single-product company Auto-populate seller context Multi-product company Ask: "Which product or solution is this asset for?" Consultant/agency/generic domain Ask: "What company or product are you representing?" Unknown/startup Ask: "Briefly, what are you selling?" Store seller context: seller: company: "[Company Name]" product: "[Product/Service]" value_props: - "[Key value prop 1]" - "[Key value prop 2]" - "[Key value prop 3]" differentiators: - "[Differentiator 1]" - "[Differentiator 2]" pricing_model: "[If publicly known]" Persist to knowledge base for future sessions. On subsequent invocations, confirm: "I have your seller context from last time — still selling [Product] at [Company]?" Step 0.2: Collect Prospect Context (a) Ask the user: Field Prompt Required Company "Which company is this asset for?" ✓ Yes Key contacts "Who are the key contacts? (names, roles)" No Deal stage "What stage is this deal?" ✓ Yes Pain points "What pain points or priorities have they shared?" No Past materials "Upload any conversation materials (transcripts, emails, notes, call recordings)" No Deal stage options: Intro / First meeting Discovery Evaluation / Technical review POC / Pilot Negotiation Close Step 0.3: Collect Audience Context (b) Ask the user: Field Prompt Required Audience type "Who's viewing this?" ✓ Yes Specific roles "Any specific titles to tailor for? (e.g., CTO, VP Engineering, CFO)" No Primary concern "What do they care most about?" ✓ Yes Objections "Any concerns or objections to address?" No Audience type options: Executive (C-suite, VPs) Technical (Architects, Engineers, Developers) Operations (Ops, IT, Procurement) Mixed / Cross-functional Primary concern options: ROI / Business impact Technical depth / Architecture Strategic alignment Risk mitigation / Security Implementation / Timeline Step 0.4: Collect Purpose Context (c) Ask the user: Field Prompt Required Goal "What's the goal of this asset?" ✓ Yes Desired action "What should the viewer do after seeing this?" ✓ Yes Goal options: Intro / First impression Discovery follow-up Technical deep-dive Executive alignment / Business case POC proposal Deal close Step 0.5: Select Format (d) Ask the user: "What format works best for this?" Format Description Best For Interactive landing page Multi-tab page with demos, metrics, calculators Exec alignment, intros, value prop Deck-style Linear slides, presentation-ready Formal meetings, large audiences One-pager Single-scroll executive summary Leave-behinds, quick summaries Workflow / Architecture demo Interactive diagram with animated flow Technical deep-dives, POC demos, integrations Step 0.6: Format-Specific Inputs If "Workflow / Architecture demo" selected: First, parse from user's description. Look for: Systems and components mentioned Data flows described Human interaction points Example scenarios Then ask for any gaps: If Missing... Ask... Components unclear "What systems or components are involved? (databases, APIs, AI, middleware, etc.)" Flow unclear "Walk me through the step-by-step flow" Human touchpoints unclear "Where does a human interact in this workflow?" Scenario vague "What's a concrete example scenario to demo?" Integration specifics "Any specific tools or platforms to highlight?" Phase 1: Research (Adaptive) Assess Context Richness Level Indicators Research Depth Rich Transcripts uploaded, detailed pain points, clear requirements Light — fill gaps only Moderate Some context, no transcripts Medium — company + industry Sparse Just company name Deep — full research pass Always Research: Prospect basics Search: "[Company]" annual report investor presentation 2025 2026 Search: "[Company]" CEO strategy priorities 2025 2026 Extract: Revenue, employees, key metrics, strategic priorities Leadership Search: "[Company]" CEO CTO CIO 2025 Extract: Names, titles, recent quotes on strategy/technology Brand colors Search: "[Company]" brand guidelines Or extract from company website Store: Primary color, secondary color, accent If Moderate/Sparse Context, Also Research: Industry context Search: "[Industry]" trends challenges 2025 2026 Extract: Common pain points, market dynamics Technology landscape Search: "[Company]" technology stack tools platforms Extract: Current solutions, potential integration points Competitive context Search: "[Company]" vs [seller's competitors] Extract: Current solutions, switching signals If Transcripts/Materials Uploaded: Conversation analysis Extract: Stated pain points, decision criteria, objections, timeline Identify: Key quotes to reference (use their exact language) Note: Specific terminology, acronyms, internal project names Phase 2: Structure Decision Interactive Landing Page Purpose Recommended Sections Intro Company Fit → Solution Overview → Key Use Cases → Why Us → Next Steps Discovery follow-up Their Priorities → How We Help → Relevant Examples → ROI Framework → Next Steps Technical deep-dive Architecture → Security & Compliance → Integration → Performance → Support Exec alignment Strategic Fit → Business Impact → ROI Calculator → Risk Mitigation → Partnership POC proposal Scope → Success Criteria → Timeline → Team → Investment → Next Steps Deal close Value Summary → Pricing → Implementation Plan → Terms → Sign-off Audience adjustments: Executive: Lead with business impact, ROI, strategic alignment Technical: Lead with architecture, security, integration depth Operations: Lead with workflow impact, change management, support Mixed: Balance strategic + tactical; use tabs to separate depth levels Deck-Style Same sections as landing page, formatted as linear slides: 1. Title slide (Prospect + Seller logos, partnership framing) 2. Agenda 3-N. One section per slide (or 2-3 slides for dense sections) N+1. Summary / Key takeaways N+2. Next steps / CTA N+3. Appendix (optional — detailed specs, pricing, etc.) Slide principles: One key message per slide Visual > text-heavy Use prospect's metrics and language Include speaker notes One-Pager Condense to single-scroll format: ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ HERO: "[Prospect Goal] with [Product]" │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ KEY POINT 1 │ KEY POINT 2 │ KEY POINT 3 │ │ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │ [Icon + 2-3 │ │ sentences] │ sentences] │ sentences] │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ PROOF POINT: [Metric, quote, or case study] │ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │ CTA: [Clear next action] │ [Contact info] │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ Workflow / Architecture Demo Structure based on complexity: Complexity Components Structure Simple 3-5 Single-view diagram with step annotations Medium 5-10 Zoomable canvas with step-by-step walkthrough Complex 10+ Multi-layer view (overview → detailed) with guided tour Standard elements: Title bar: [Scenario Name] — Powered by [Seller Product] Component nodes: Visual boxes/icons for each system Flow arrows: Animated connections showing data movement Step panel: Sidebar explaining current step in plain language Controls: Play / Pause / Step Forward / Step Back / Reset Annotations: Callouts for key decision points and value-adds Data preview: Sample payloads or transformations at each step Phase 3: Content Generation General Principles All content should: Reference specific pain points from user input or transcripts Use prospect's language — their terminology, their stated priorities Map seller's product → prospect's needs explicitly Include proof points where available (case studies, metrics, quotes) Feel tailored, not templated Section Templates Hero / Intro Headline: "[Prospect's Goal] with [Seller's Product]" Subhead: Tie to their stated priority or top industry challenge Metrics: 3-4 key facts about the prospect (shows we did homework) Their Priorities (if discovery follow-up) Reference specific pain points from conversation: - Use their exact words where possible - Show we listened and understood - Connect each to how we help Solution Mapping For each pain point: ├── The challenge (in their words) ├── How [Product] addresses it ├── Proof point or example └── Outcome / benefit Use Cases / Demos 3-5 relevant use cases: ├── Visual mockup or interactive demo ├── Business impact (quantified if possible) ├── "How it works" — 3-4 step summary └── Relevant to their industry/role ROI / Business Case Interactive calculator with: ├── Inputs relevant to their business (from research) │ ├── Number of users/developers │ ├── Current costs or time spent │ └── Expected improvement % ├── Outputs: │ ├── Annual value / savings │ ├── Cost of solution │ ├── Net ROI │ └── Payback period └── Assumptions clearly stated (editable) Why Us / Differentiators ├── Differentiators vs. alternatives they might consider ├── Trust, security, compliance positioning ├── Support and partnership model └── Customer proof points (logos, quotes, case studies) Next Steps / CTA ├── Clear action aligned to Purpose (c) ├── Specific next step (not vague "let's chat") ├── Contact information ├── Suggested timeline └── What happens after they take action Workflow Demo Content Component Definitions For each system, define: component: id: "snowflake" label: "Snowflake Data Warehouse" type: "database" # database | api | ai | middleware | human | document | output icon: "database" description: "Financial performance data" brand_color: "#29B5E8" Component types: human — Person initiating or receiving document — PDFs, contracts, files ai — AI/ML models, agents database — Data stores, warehouses api — APIs, services middleware — Integration platforms, MCP servers output — Dashboards, reports, notifications Flow Steps For each step, define: step: number: 1 from: "human" to: "claude" action: "Initiates performance review" description: "Sarah, a Brand Analyst at [Prospect], kicks off the quarterly review..." data_example: "Review request: Nike brand, Q4 2025" duration: "~1 second" value_note: "No manual data gathering required" Scenario Narrative Write a clear, specific walkthrough: Step 1: Human Trigger "Sarah, a Brand Performance Analyst at Centric Brands, needs to review Q4 performance for the Nike license agreement. She opens the review dashboard and clicks 'Start Review'..." Step 2: Contract Analysis "Claude retrieves the Nike contract PDF and extracts the performance obligations: minimum $50M revenue, 12% margin requirement, quarterly reporting deadline..." Step 3: Data Query "Claude formulates a query and sends it to Workato DataGenie: 'Get Q4 2025 revenue and gross margin for Nike brand from Snowflake'..." Step 4: Results & Synthesis "Snowflake returns the data. Claude compares actuals vs. obligations: Revenue $52.3M ✓ (exceeded by $2.3M) Margin 11.2% ⚠️ (0.8% below threshold)..." Step 5: Insight Delivery "Claude synthesizes findings into an executive summary with recommendations: 'Review promotional spend allocation to improve margin performance...'" Phase 4: Visual Design Color System :root { /* === Prospect Brand (Primary) === / --brand-primary: #[extracted from research]; --brand-secondary: #[extracted]; --brand-primary-rgb: [r, g, b]; / For rgba() usage / / === Dark Theme Base === / --bg-primary: #0a0d14; --bg-elevated: #0f131c; --bg-surface: #161b28; --bg-hover: #1e2536; / === Text === / --text-primary: #ffffff; --text-secondary: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7); --text-muted: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5); / === Accent === / --accent: var(--brand-primary); --accent-hover: var(--brand-secondary); --accent-glow: rgba(var(--brand-primary-rgb), 0.3); / === Status === / --success: #10b981; --warning: #f59e0b; --error: #ef4444; } Typography / Primary: Clean, professional sans-serif / font-family: 'Inter', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, sans-serif; / Headings / h1: 2.5rem, font-weight: 700 h2: 1.75rem, font-weight: 600 h3: 1.25rem, font-weight: 600 / Body / body: 1rem, font-weight: 400, line-height: 1.6 / Captions/Labels / small: 0.875rem, font-weight: 500 Visual Elements Cards: Background: var(--bg-surface) Border: 1px solid rgba(255,255,255,0.1) Border-radius: 12px Box-shadow: subtle, layered Hover: slight elevation, border glow Buttons: Primary: var(--accent) background, white text Secondary: transparent, accent border Hover: brightness increase, subtle scale Animations: Transitions: 200-300ms ease Tab switches: fade + slide Hover states: smooth, not jarring Loading: subtle pulse or skeleton Workflow Demo Specific Component Nodes: .node { background: var(--bg-surface); border: 2px solid var(--brand-primary); border-radius: 12px; padding: 16px; min-width: 140px; } .node.active { box-shadow: 0 0 20px var(--accent-glow); border-color: var(--accent); } .node.human { border-color: #f59e0b; / Warm color for humans / } .node.ai { background: linear-gradient(135deg, var(--bg-surface), var(--bg-elevated)); border-color: var(--accent); } Flow Arrows: .arrow { stroke: var(--text-muted); stroke-width: 2; fill: none; marker-end: url(#arrowhead); } .arrow.active { stroke: var(--accent); stroke-dasharray: 8 4; animation: flowDash 1s linear infinite; } Canvas: .canvas { background: radial-gradient(circle at center, var(--bg-elevated) 0%, var(--bg-primary) 100%), url("data:image/svg+xml,..."); / Subtle grid pattern */ overflow: auto; } Phase 5: Clarifying Questions (REQUIRED) Before building any asset, always ask clarifying questions. This ensures alignment and prevents wasted effort. Step 5.1: Summarize Understanding First, show the user what you understood: "Here's what I'm planning to build: Asset: [Format] for [Prospect Company] Audience: [Audience type] — specifically [roles if known] Goal: [Purpose] → driving toward [desired action] Key themes: [2-3 main points to emphasize] [For workflow demos, also show:] Components: [List of systems] Flow: [Step 1] → [Step 2] →

...

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量2.9K
评分4.4 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年10月13日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.4(20)
5
75%
4
25%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

时间线

创建2026年3月17日
最后更新2026年10月13日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷