T

to-tickets

by @mattpocockv
4.9(120)

将计划、规范或当前对话分解为一组垂直切片的tracer-bullet票据,每个票据声明其阻塞依赖,并自动发布到配置的追踪器(本地文件或GitHub/Linear等)。适用于技术团队快速将模糊需求转化为可执行的任务序列,减少手动编排时间,确保依赖关系完整。

ticket-generationtask-breakdownproject-planningvertical-slicingblocking-dependenciesGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill to-tickets
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1 组
使用前

在没有此技能之前,技术负责人需要手动阅读规范文档,理解需求,然后逐一创建任务并分析依赖关系,通常耗时数小时,且容易遗漏阻塞关系,导致开发过程中出现阻塞。

使用后

使用了此技能后,只需提供计划或规范,该Skill自动将其分解为带阻塞依赖的垂直切片票据,并直接发布到追踪器中,大幅减少人工编排时间,并确保依赖关系完整。

SKILL.md

To Tickets

Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of tickets — tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that block it.

The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run /setup-matt-pocock-skills if not.

Process

1. Gather context

Work from whatever is already in the conversation context. If the user passes a reference (a spec path, an issue number or URL) as an argument, fetch it and read its full body and comments.

2. Explore the codebase (optional)

If you have not already explored the codebase, do so to understand the current state of the code. Ticket titles and descriptions should use the project's domain glossary vocabulary, and respect ADRs in the area you're touching.

Look for opportunities to prefactor the code to make the implementation easier. "Make the change easy, then make the easy change."

3. Draft vertical slices

Break the work into tracer bullet tickets.

  • Each slice cuts a narrow but COMPLETE path through every layer (schema, API, UI, tests) — vertical, NOT a horizontal slice of one layer
  • A completed slice is demoable or verifiable on its own
  • Each slice is sized to fit in a single fresh context window
  • Any prefactoring should be done first

Give each ticket its blocking edges — the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.

Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing. A wide refactor is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose blast radius fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as expand–contract. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket — green is promised only there.

4. Quiz the user

Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:

  • Title: short descriptive name
  • Blocked by: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
  • What it delivers: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work

Ask the user:

  • Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
  • Are the blocking edges correct — does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
  • Should any tickets be merged or split further?

Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.

5. Publish the tickets to the configured tracker

Publish the approved tickets. How depends on the tracker /setup-matt-pocock-skills configured — the tickets are the same either way, only the shape of the blocking edges changes:

  • Local files → write one tickets.md in the repo root, all tickets in dependency order (blockers first), each with its "Blocked by" listing the titles it depends on. Use the file template below.
  • A real issue tracker (GitHub, Linear, …) → publish one issue per ticket in dependency order (blockers first) so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the platform's native blocking / sub-issue relationship where it has one; otherwise set each ticket's "Blocked by" to the blocking issues. Apply the ready-for-agent triage label unless instructed otherwise — the tickets are agent-grabbable by construction.

Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.

Tickets:

A one-line summary of what these tickets build. Reference the source spec if there is one.

Work the frontier: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom.

What to build: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not a layer-by-layer implementation list.

Blocked by: the titles of the tickets that gate this one, or "None — can start immediately".

  • Acceptance criterion 1
  • Acceptance criterion 2

...

Parent

A reference to the parent issue on the tracker (if the source was an existing issue, otherwise omit this section).

What to build

The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective — not layer-by-layer implementation.

Acceptance criteria

  • Criterion 1
  • Criterion 2

Blocked by

  • A reference to each blocking ticket, or "None — can start immediately".

In either form, avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.

Work the frontier one ticket at a time with /implement, clearing context between tickets.

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量703.2K
评分4.9 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年10月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.9(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🤖claude-code

时间线

创建2026年7月9日
最后更新2026年10月23日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷