首页/教育与培训/related-work-writing
R

related-work-writing

by @lingzhi227v
4.3(120)

此技能自动分析论文贡献,按主题组织文献,生成高质量Related Work段落。适用于撰写或修改学术论文的Related Work部分,确保引用全面、对比清晰,显著提升写作效率与质量。

related-workacademic-writingliterature-reviewcitationpaper-writingGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills --skill related-work-writing
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

用户手动整理文献、组织主题、撰写对比段落,常常耗费大量时间,且容易遗漏重要引用或导致结构混乱,返工频繁。

使用后

此技能一键生成结构清晰、引用完整的Related Work段落,减少手动调整,用户只需微调即可。

SKILL.md

Related Work Writing

Generate publication-quality Related Work sections with proper citations and thematic organization.

Input

  • $0 — Current paper draft or method description
  • $1 — Collected literature (BibTeX entries, paper summaries, or literature review notes)

References

  • Related work writing prompts and strategies: ~/.claude/skills/related-work-writing/references/related-work-prompts.md

Workflow

Step 1: Analyze the Paper's Contributions

  • Read the current paper draft (especially Methods and Introduction)
  • Identify the key contributions and novelty claims
  • List the technical components that need literature context

Step 2: Organize Literature by Theme

Group related papers into thematic clusters:

  • Each cluster should represent a research direction or technique
  • Common themes: problem formulation, methodology family, application domain, evaluation approach
  • Order themes from most to least relevant to your work

Step 3: Write Each Theme Paragraph

For each thematic group:

  1. Topic sentence — Introduce the research direction
  2. Describe key works — Summarize 2-5 representative papers
  3. Compare and contrast — How does each approach differ from yours?
  4. Transition — Connect to the next theme or to your contribution

Step 4: Refine

  • Ensure every cited paper has a clear reason for inclusion
  • Check that your work's novelty is clear from the comparisons
  • Verify all \cite{} keys exist in the .bib file
  • Aim for 1-2 pages (single column) or 0.5-1 page (double column)

Rules

  • Compare and contrast, don't just describe — "Unlike [X] which assumes..., our method..."
  • Organize by theme, not chronologically — Group by research direction
  • Cite broadly — Not just the most popular papers; include recent and diverse work
  • Be fair — Acknowledge strengths of prior work before stating limitations
  • Explain inapplicability — If a method could apply to your setting, explain why you don't compare experimentally, or add it to experiments
  • Use present tense for established facts — "Smith et al. propose..." or "This approach uses..."
  • End with positioning — The final paragraph should clearly position your work relative to all discussed prior work

Related Skills

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量1.2K
评分4.3 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年7月26日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.3(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🤖claude-code

时间线

创建2026年7月26日
最后更新2026年7月26日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷