R
related-work-writing
by @lingzhi227v
4.3(120)
此技能自动分析论文贡献,按主题组织文献,生成高质量Related Work段落。适用于撰写或修改学术论文的Related Work部分,确保引用全面、对比清晰,显著提升写作效率与质量。
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills --skill related-work-writingcompare_arrows
Before / After 效果对比
1 组使用前
用户手动整理文献、组织主题、撰写对比段落,常常耗费大量时间,且容易遗漏重要引用或导致结构混乱,返工频繁。
使用后
此技能一键生成结构清晰、引用完整的Related Work段落,减少手动调整,用户只需微调即可。
SKILL.md
Related Work Writing
Generate publication-quality Related Work sections with proper citations and thematic organization.
Input
$0— Current paper draft or method description$1— Collected literature (BibTeX entries, paper summaries, or literature review notes)
References
- Related work writing prompts and strategies:
~/.claude/skills/related-work-writing/references/related-work-prompts.md
Workflow
Step 1: Analyze the Paper's Contributions
- Read the current paper draft (especially Methods and Introduction)
- Identify the key contributions and novelty claims
- List the technical components that need literature context
Step 2: Organize Literature by Theme
Group related papers into thematic clusters:
- Each cluster should represent a research direction or technique
- Common themes: problem formulation, methodology family, application domain, evaluation approach
- Order themes from most to least relevant to your work
Step 3: Write Each Theme Paragraph
For each thematic group:
- Topic sentence — Introduce the research direction
- Describe key works — Summarize 2-5 representative papers
- Compare and contrast — How does each approach differ from yours?
- Transition — Connect to the next theme or to your contribution
Step 4: Refine
- Ensure every cited paper has a clear reason for inclusion
- Check that your work's novelty is clear from the comparisons
- Verify all
\cite{}keys exist in the.bibfile - Aim for 1-2 pages (single column) or 0.5-1 page (double column)
Rules
- Compare and contrast, don't just describe — "Unlike [X] which assumes..., our method..."
- Organize by theme, not chronologically — Group by research direction
- Cite broadly — Not just the most popular papers; include recent and diverse work
- Be fair — Acknowledge strengths of prior work before stating limitations
- Explain inapplicability — If a method could apply to your setting, explain why you don't compare experimentally, or add it to experiments
- Use present tense for established facts — "Smith et al. propose..." or "This approach uses..."
- End with positioning — The final paragraph should clearly position your work relative to all discussed prior work
Related Skills
- Upstream: literature-search, literature-review, citation-management
- Downstream: paper-writing-section
- See also: survey-generation
用户评价 (0)
发表评价
效果
易用性
文档
兼容性
暂无评价
统计数据
安装量1.2K
评分4.3 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年7月26日
对比案例1 组
用户评分
4.3(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%
为此 Skill 评分
0.0
兼容平台
🤖claude-code
时间线
创建2026年7月26日
最后更新2026年7月26日