首页/金融与投资/ito-basket-compare
I

ito-basket-compare

by @affaan-mv
4.3(120)

此技能用于对比Itô预测市场篮子与用户的知识库、投资组合笔记、财务状况或研究主题,进行只读式的缺口分析和假设检验,帮助用户发现匹配、冲突和缺失信息,而不提供投资建议。

comparisonprediction-marketportfolio-analysisgap-analysisitôGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ecc --skill ito-basket-compare
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1 组
使用前

用户手动从多个笔记和文档中查找与预测市场篮子相关的信息,逐一比对,耗时且容易遗漏关键冲突或缺失数据。

使用后

此技能自动检索用户的笔记,并基于篮子主题进行结构化对比,生成匹配、冲突和缺失分析报告,大幅提升效率和准确性。

SKILL.md

Itô Basket Compare

Use this skill to compare a basket, theme, or market set against a user's knowledge base, portfolio notes, research memo, CRM context, or stated thesis.

This skill is read-only. It does not recommend trades. It helps a user inspect fit, exposure, assumptions, and missing context before they decide what to do.

Guardrails

  • Do not provide investment advice or tell the user to buy, sell, hold, hedge, lever, or size a trade.
  • Do not execute, prepare, or submit orders.
  • Do not use private documents unless the user explicitly points to them.
  • Use ITO_API_KEY only for read-only Itô basket/market data after explicit user request.
  • If comparing against financials, preserve privacy and summarize only the fields needed for the comparison.

Comparison Modes

Basket vs Knowledge Base

  1. Identify the basket theme and underliers.
  2. Retrieve the user's relevant notes, docs, or memory snippets.
  3. Map each underlier to claims, sources, uncertainties, and stale assumptions.
  4. Return aligned signals, conflicting signals, and missing research.

Basket vs Portfolio Notes

  1. Parse the user's watchlist, holdings summary, or exposure notes.
  2. Compare themes, geographies, time horizons, and event outcomes.
  3. Flag concentration, correlation, and duplicated narrative exposure.
  4. Avoid recommendations; phrase output as inspection and questions.

Basket vs Financial Context

  1. Accept only user-provided or explicitly selected financial context.
  2. Identify liquidity, drawdown, time-horizon, and constraint mismatches.
  3. Ask for missing constraints instead of guessing.

Output Contract

Use this structure:

  1. Basket summary
  2. Comparison target
  3. Matches
  4. Conflicts or stale assumptions
  5. Missing context
  6. User-action checklist

End with:

This comparison is informational and not investment or trading advice.

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量1.5K
评分4.3 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年8月13日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.3(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🤖claude-code

时间线

创建2026年7月26日
最后更新2026年8月13日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷