首页/科学研究/firecrawl-research-papers
F

firecrawl-research-papers

by @firecrawlv
4.4(120)

该技能利用 Firecrawl 查找并综合研究论文、白皮书、PDF 和技术报告等学术资源。它能自动进行文献检索、内容提取和结构化总结,帮助用户快速生成文献综述、论文摘要或研究领域分析,确保信息来源可靠且全面。

researchliterature-reviewacademic-paperspdf-extractionsynthesisGitHub
安装方式
git clone https://github.com/firecrawl/firecrawl-workflows.git
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

手动进行文献检索、阅读和总结一篇复杂主题的综述,需要耗费大量时间进行资料搜集、筛选和内容整合,难以保证全面性和时效性。

使用后

通过自动化工具快速抓取和分析海量学术资料,智能生成结构化的文献综述,大幅缩短研究周期,提高综述的覆盖广度和准确性。

SKILL.md

Firecrawl Research Papers

Use this to create a sourced literature review.

Onboarding Interview

Infer the topic, source constraints, target count, and output format from context. If the topic is clear, proceed immediately.

Ask at most 1-3 concise questions only if blocked, such as the topic, target paper count, or required venue/date/method constraints.

Firecrawl Collection Plan

Search for papers, PDFs, whitepapers, technical reports, and research blogs. Scrape PDF URLs directly when available; Firecrawl can extract PDFs.

Target source types:

  • academic papers from arXiv, university sites, ACM/IEEE pages where accessible
  • industry reports and whitepapers
  • company research blogs
  • technical articles and conference summaries

Parallel Work

If appropriate, use sub-agents or equivalent parallel task runners:

  • Academic Papers researcher
  • Industry Reports researcher
  • Technical Articles researcher
  • Synthesis and citation reviewer

Final Deliverable

# Literature Review: [Topic]

## Abstract
[2-3 paragraph summary]

## Key Papers
[Title, authors, source URL, key findings, methodology, relevance]

## Themes And Consensus
[What sources agree on]

## Open Questions And Debates
[Disagreements and unresolved questions]

## Emerging Trends
[Recent developments]

## Sources
[Organized by paper/report/article]

## Rerun Inputs
workflow: firecrawl-research-papers
topic: [topic]
target_count: [number]
output: [markdown/brief]

Quality Bar

  • Every major claim should trace to a source.
  • Note inaccessible or failed PDFs.
  • Distinguish peer-reviewed work from blogs and vendor reports.

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量3.3K
评分4.4 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年5月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.4(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🤖claude-code

时间线

创建2026年5月22日
最后更新2026年5月23日