D

domain-modeling

by @mattpocockv
4.9(120)

此技能旨在帮助开发者主动构建和完善项目的领域模型,明确核心业务术语和通用语言,并及时记录重要的架构决策。通过挑战模糊概念、探讨具体场景和交叉验证代码,它能有效减少团队沟通障碍,提升对业务的理解深度,确保软件设计与业务需求高度一致,从而提高开发效率和项目质量。

domain-modelingsoftware-architectureubiquitous-languagearchitectural-decisionsglossaryGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill domain-modeling
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1 组
使用前

在没有此技能之前,开发者在项目初期或迭代中,常因领域术语不一致、概念模糊不清、架构决策未及时记录而导致团队沟通障碍、理解偏差,甚至返工,严重影响开发效率和项目质量。

使用后

此技能通过主动构建和完善领域模型,明确通用语言,并及时记录架构决策,显著减少了沟通成本和返工,提升了团队对业务的理解深度和开发效率。

SKILL.md

Domain Modeling

Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline — challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading CONTEXT.md for vocabulary is not this skill — that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/
│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/

If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:

/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│   ├── ordering/
│   │   ├── CONTEXT.md
│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions
│   └── billing/
│       ├── CONTEXT.md
│       └── docs/adr/

Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"

Update CONTEXT.md inline

When a term is resolved, update CONTEXT.md right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.

CONTEXT.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat CONTEXT.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

  1. Hard to reverse — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
  2. Surprising without context — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
  3. The result of a real trade-off — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量868.7K
评分4.9 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年10月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.9(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🤖claude-code

时间线

创建2026年6月19日
最后更新2026年10月23日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷