C
convex-deploy-guard
by @convexv
4.6(120)
在任何会影响 Convex 部署的命令执行前,先识别并播报目标部署环境(dev / preview / prod),生产环境操作需逐次、逐目标、逐会话重新获得显式确认,并支持会话级只读模式。该 Skill 把「先确认、再执行」固化为标准流程,避免误部署到生产环境,显著降低线上事故与回滚成本。
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/convex/agent-skills --skill convex-deploy-guardcompare_arrows
Before / After 效果对比
1 组使用前
开发者直接在终端敲下部署命令,命令落到哪个环境全凭记忆和环境变量,生产与开发环境混用一台机器,误发布到线上后才从用户投诉中发现。
使用后
该 Skill 在每条部署命令前先分类并播报目标环境,生产操作必须逐次获得新的显式确认,误指向线上时会被流程拦截,事故在命令执行前就被终止。
SKILL.md
Deployment target guard
Deployments are not interchangeable, and most incidents start with a command aimed at the wrong one. Every Convex project has several (personal dev, preview, prod — often across multiple projects on one machine). This guard is the standing discipline: identify, announce, then act — and treat prod as consent-gated, per action, per session.
Workflow
- IDENTIFY before you act: read
CONVEX_DEPLOYMENTin .env.local,convex.json, and whetherCONVEX_DEPLOY_KEYis set; or call the official Convex MCPstatustool. Classify the target: local-anonymous | dev | preview | prod. If two sources disagree, resolve before proceeding. - ANNOUNCE in one line before any deployment-affecting command:
target: dev (joyful-capybara-123, personal dev). Never run the command in the same breath as discovering the target — announce first. - PROD needs a FRESH explicit yes: before
npx convex deploy(when it resolves to prod),npx convex run --prod,env seton prod, snapshotimport/exporton prod, or starting the MCP with prod access — state exactly what will change on which deployment and get an explicit yes in THIS session. A yes given earlier, or for a different target, does not carry. - MCP safety defaults: start the official MCP scoped non-prod (
--deployment dev). The two prod flags are DIFFERENT risk levels — keep them split: a read-only prod audit (advisor/insights reading data/logs/insights) passes ONLY--cautiously-allow-production-pii(read tools);--dangerously-enable-production-deployments(which enables MUTATING prod tools) stays OFF unless the user explicitly asked to CHANGE prod this session. Never pair them by default — 'look at prod' must not silently grant 'mutate prod'. - READ-ONLY session mode: when the user says 'read-only' / 'don't change anything', honor it absolutely for the rest of the session — no deploy, no env set/remove, no mutations via
run, no imports; start the MCP with--disable-tools run,envSet,envRemove. - Wrong-deployment diagnosis: when a deploy 'didn't change anything', do NOT re-deploy harder. Re-run step 1 — the deploy almost certainly landed on a different deployment than the one being observed.
- Ambiguity = stop: if you cannot determine which deployment a command will hit, find out (status tool) — never guess.
Rules
- Classify and announce the target BEFORE every deployment-affecting command — identification and action are two separate steps.
- Prod consent is per-action, per-target, per-session: state what changes where, get a fresh explicit yes.
- Keep the two prod MCP flags split by risk: --cautiously-allow-production-pii (read-only) for an audit; --dangerously-enable-production-deployments (mutating) only when the user explicitly asks to change prod. Both are user-spoken-only; default every MCP start to a non-prod deployment selector.
- Read-only mode, once requested, is absolute for the session — including 'harmless' mutations.
- A deploy that seemed to do nothing means the WRONG deployment changed — diagnose the target, don't re-run.
- This guard composes: ship, env, migrate, and seed run it as their step 0; it is not itself a deploy tool.
用户评价 (0)
发表评价
效果
易用性
文档
兼容性
暂无评价
统计数据
安装量35.0K
评分4.6 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年10月23日
对比案例1 组
用户评分
4.6(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%
为此 Skill 评分
0.0
兼容平台
🤖claude-code
时间线
创建2026年10月17日
最后更新2026年10月23日