首页/AI 开发工具与流程/ai-research-reproduction
A

ai-research-reproduction

by @lllllllamav
4.9(120)

此技能旨在自动化深度学习研究仓库的复现过程,确保复现结果的最小信任、可审计性和科学严谨性。它通过读取README、选择最小可信目标、协调环境设置、执行、验证训练、分析仓库并生成标准化报告,帮助用户高效验证AI研究成果,减少手动干预和错误,提升研究可信度。

reproductiondeep-learningresearchauditableworkflowGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/lllllllama/rigorpilot-skills --skill ai-research-reproduction
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1 组
使用前

在没有这个技能之前,开发者手动复现深度学习研究时,需要花费大量时间处理环境配置、依赖安装、代码调试等问题,整个过程耗时且容易出错,导致复现效率低下。

使用后

该 Skill 能够自动化深度学习仓库的复现流程,从环境准备到结果输出,显著减少手动干预和调试时间,确保复现过程高效且结果可信。

SKILL.md

ai-research-reproduction

Purpose

Use this as the Rigor Reproduce compatible skill slug for README-first deep learning repository reproduction. The installed slug remains ai-research-reproduction for compatibility. The skill guides the agent toward a minimal trustworthy run with auditable evidence; it should not micromanage implementation details that the model can infer from the repository. Reproduction is not "make it run by changing anything"; it means faithfully reading the README, environment, weights, datasets, and documented commands, then recording results and deviations.

Start from the shared operating principles in ../../references/agent-operating-principles.md, then load ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md and ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when scientific meaning, comparability, or experiment details are at stake.

Fit

Use this skill when all are true:

  • The target is an AI code repository with a README, scripts, configs, or documented commands.
  • The request spans multiple trusted phases such as intake, setup, execution, training verification, analysis, paper-gap resolution, and reporting.
  • The desired result is a small reproducible target, not broad experimentation.

Do not use this skill for paper summaries, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, open-ended research design, or explicit candidate-only exploration.

Trusted Target Selection

Choose the smallest target that can honestly demonstrate repository-grounded reproduction:

  1. documented inference
  2. documented evaluation
  3. documented training startup or partial verification
  4. full training only after explicit user confirmation

Treat README guidance as the primary reproduction intent. Use repository files to clarify the README, not to silently replace it. When the README and paper conflict, record the conflict and use paper-context-resolver only for the narrow reproduction-critical gap.

Workflow

  1. Read the README and nearby repo signals.
  2. Use repo-intake-and-plan to extract documented commands and candidate targets.
  3. Select and justify the minimum trustworthy target.
  4. Use env-and-assets-bootstrap only for target-specific environment, checkpoint, dataset, and cache assumptions.
  5. Use analyze-project only when structure, insertion points, or suspicious implementation patterns need read-only clarification.
  6. Use minimal-run-and-audit for documented inference, evaluation, smoke, or sanity execution.
  7. Use run-train instead when the selected trusted target is training startup, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume.
  8. Pause for human review before fuller training claims or any change that could alter dataset, split, checkpoint, preprocessing, metric, loss, model semantics, or result interpretation.
  9. Write the standardized outputs and give a concise final note in the user's language when practical.

Patch Boundary

Prefer no repository edits. If edits are needed, keep them conservative and auditable:

  • Try command-line arguments, environment variables, path fixes, dependency version fixes, or dependency-file fixes before code changes.
  • Reproduction fixes are allowed when needed, but they must not be hidden. State what changed, why it was necessary, whether it changes scientific meaning, and whether it affects comparability with the paper, README, or baseline.
  • Avoid changing model architecture, core inference semantics, training logic, loss functions, or experiment meaning.
  • If repository files must change, create a branch named repro/YYYY-MM-DD-short-task, keep verified patch commits sparse, and record README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md.

See references/patch-policy.md.

Outputs

Always target repro_outputs/:

SUMMARY.md
COMMANDS.md
LOG.md
SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md
COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md
status.json
PATCHES.md   # only if patches were applied

Use the templates under assets/ and the field rules in references/output-spec.md.

  • Put the shortest high-value summary in SUMMARY.md.
  • Put copyable commands in COMMANDS.md.
  • Put process evidence, assumptions, failures, and decisions in LOG.md.
  • Put scientific meaning and change effects in SCIENTIFIC_CHANGELOG.md.
  • Put comparison anchors and protocol deviations in COMPARABILITY_REPORT.md.
  • Put durable machine-readable state in status.json.
  • Put branch, commit, validation, and README-fidelity impact in PATCHES.md when needed.
  • Distinguish verified facts from inferred guesses.

Reference Loading

  • Load references/language-policy.md when writing human-readable outputs.
  • Load ../../references/research-rigor-principles.md before making comparability, contribution, or research-result claims.
  • Load ../../references/deep-learning-experiment-principles.md when dataset, split, metric, checkpoint, training, or evaluation details matter.
  • Load references/research-safety-principles.md before protocol-sensitive decisions.
  • Load references/patch-policy.md before modifying repository files.
  • Keep specialized logic in sub-skills, scripts, templates, or references rather than expanding this entrypoint.

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量330.5K
评分4.9 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年10月23日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.9(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🤖claude-code

时间线

创建2026年6月9日
最后更新2026年10月23日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷