首页/法务与合同/vendor-review
V

vendor-review

by @anthropicsv1.0.0
4.3(3)

对供应商进行结构化评估,覆盖成本效益、风险分析、服务质量和合规性,支持采购决策

legal-compliancerisk-managementregulatory-compliancecomplianceGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill vendor-review
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

收集供应商的报价单、资质文件和合同条款,手动对比不同供应商的成本和服务水平,评估潜在风险,撰写评估报告,评估一个供应商需要 2-3 小时

使用后

按照结构化框架收集供应商信息,自动生成包含成本、风险、质量和合规性的综合评估报告,20 分钟完成分析

description SKILL.md

vendor-review

/vendor-review

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Evaluate a vendor with structured analysis covering cost, risk, performance, and fit.

Usage

/vendor-review $ARGUMENTS

What I Need From You

  • Vendor name: Who are you evaluating?

  • Context: New vendor evaluation, renewal decision, or comparison?

  • Details: Contract terms, pricing, proposal document, or current performance data

Evaluation Framework

Cost Analysis (Total Cost of Ownership)

  • Total cost of ownership (not just license fees)

  • Implementation and migration costs

  • Training and onboarding costs

  • Ongoing support and maintenance

  • Exit costs (data migration, contract termination)

Risk Assessment

  • Vendor financial stability

  • Security and compliance posture

  • Concentration risk (single vendor dependency)

  • Contract lock-in and exit terms

  • Business continuity and disaster recovery

Performance Metrics

  • SLA compliance

  • Support response times

  • Uptime and reliability

  • Feature delivery cadence

  • Customer satisfaction

Comparison Matrix

When comparing vendors, produce a side-by-side matrix covering: pricing, features, integrations, security, support, contract terms, and references.

Output

## Vendor Review: [Vendor Name]
**Date:** [Date] | **Type:** [New / Renewal / Comparison]

### Summary
[2-3 sentence recommendation]

### Cost Analysis
| Component | Annual Cost | Notes |
|-----------|-------------|-------|
| License/subscription | $[X] | [Per seat, flat, usage-based] |
| Implementation | $[X] | [One-time] |
| Support/maintenance | $[X] | [Included or add-on] |
| **Total Year 1** | **$[X]** | |
| **Total 3-Year** | **$[X]** | |

### Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-----------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [Mitigation] |

### Strengths
- [Strength 1]
- [Strength 2]

### Concerns
- [Concern 1]
- [Concern 2]

### Recommendation
[Proceed / Negotiate / Pass] — [Reasoning]

### Negotiation Points
- [Leverage point 1]
- [Leverage point 2]

If Connectors Available

If ~~knowledge base is connected:

  • Search for existing vendor evaluations, contracts, and performance reviews

  • Pull procurement policies and approval thresholds

If ~~procurement is connected:

  • Pull current contract terms, spend history, and renewal dates

  • Compare pricing against existing vendor agreements

Tips

  • Upload the proposal — I can extract pricing, terms, and SLAs from vendor documents.

  • Compare vendors — "Compare Vendor A vs Vendor B" gets you a side-by-side analysis.

  • Include current spend — For renewals, knowing what you pay now helps evaluate price changes.

Weekly Installs318Repositoryanthropics/know…-pluginsGitHub Stars10.6KFirst SeenMar 13, 2026Security AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled oncodex305gemini-cli303opencode302cursor302kimi-cli301github-copilot301

forum用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价,来写第一条吧

统计数据

安装量200
评分4.3 / 5.0
版本1.0.0
更新日期2026年3月31日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.3(3)
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code

时间线

创建2026年3月31日
最后更新2026年3月31日