token-budget-advisor
在响应生成前拦截并询问用户期望的深度,控制 token 消耗和响应长度,优化成本和效率
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill token-budget-advisorBefore / After 效果对比
1 组每次都生成完整长响应,用户只需简短答案时也消耗大量 token,月度 API 费用超预算 50%
提前询问响应深度,按需生成简短或详细答案,token 消耗降低 40%,费用控制在预算内
token-budget-advisor
Token Budget Advisor (TBA)
Intercept the response flow to offer the user a choice about response depth before Claude answers.
When to Use
-
User wants to control how long or detailed a response is
-
User mentions tokens, budget, depth, or response length
-
User says "short version", "tldr", "brief", "al 25%", "exhaustive", etc.
-
Any time the user wants to choose depth/detail level upfront
Do not trigger when: user already set a level this session (maintain it silently), or the answer is trivially one line.
How It Works
Step 1 — Estimate input tokens
Use the repository's canonical context-budget heuristics to estimate the prompt's token count mentally.
Use the same calibration guidance as context-budget:
-
prose:
words × 1.3 -
code-heavy or mixed/code blocks:
chars / 4
For mixed content, use the dominant content type and keep the estimate heuristic.
Step 2 — Estimate response size by complexity
Classify the prompt, then apply the multiplier range to get the full response window:
Complexity Multiplier range Example prompts
Simple 3× – 8× "What is X?", yes/no, single fact
Medium 8× – 20× "How does X work?"
Medium-High 10× – 25× Code request with context
Complex 15× – 40× Multi-part analysis, comparisons, architecture
Creative 10× – 30× Stories, essays, narrative writing
Response window = input_tokens × mult_min to input_tokens × mult_max (but don’t exceed your model’s configured output-token limit).
Step 3 — Present depth options
Present this block before answering, using the actual estimated numbers:
Analyzing your prompt...
Input: ~[N] tokens | Type: [type] | Complexity: [level] | Language: [lang]
Choose your depth level:
[1] Essential (25%) -> ~[tokens] Direct answer only, no preamble
[2] Moderate (50%) -> ~[tokens] Answer + context + 1 example
[3] Detailed (75%) -> ~[tokens] Full answer with alternatives
[4] Exhaustive (100%) -> ~[tokens] Everything, no limits
Which level? (1-4 or say "25% depth", "50% depth", "75% depth", "100% depth")
Precision: heuristic estimate ~85-90% accuracy (±15%).
Level token estimates (within the response window):
-
25% →
min + (max - min) × 0.25 -
50% →
min + (max - min) × 0.50 -
75% →
min + (max - min) × 0.75 -
100% →
max
Step 4 — Respond at the chosen level
Level Target length Include Omit
25% Essential 2-4 sentences max Direct answer, key conclusion Context, examples, nuance, alternatives
50% Moderate 1-3 paragraphs Answer + necessary context + 1 example Deep analysis, edge cases, references
75% Detailed Structured response Multiple examples, pros/cons, alternatives Extreme edge cases, exhaustive references
100% Exhaustive No restriction Everything — full analysis, all code, all perspectives Nothing
Shortcuts — skip the question
If the user already signals a level, respond at that level immediately without asking:
What they say Level
"1" / "25% depth" / "short version" / "brief answer" / "tldr" 25%
"2" / "50% depth" / "moderate depth" / "balanced answer" 50%
"3" / "75% depth" / "detailed answer" / "thorough answer" 75%
"4" / "100% depth" / "exhaustive answer" / "full deep dive" 100%
If the user set a level earlier in the session, maintain it silently for subsequent responses unless they change it.
Precision note
This skill uses heuristic estimation — no real tokenizer. Accuracy ~85-90%, variance ±15%. Always show the disclaimer.
Examples
Triggers
-
"Give me the short version first."
-
"How many tokens will your answer use?"
-
"Respond at 50% depth."
-
"I want the exhaustive answer, not the summary."
-
"Dame la version corta y luego la detallada."
Does Not Trigger
-
"What is a JWT token?"
-
"The checkout flow uses a payment token."
-
"Is this normal?"
-
"Complete the refactor."
-
Follow-up questions after the user already chose a depth for the session
Source
Standalone skill from TBA — Token Budget Advisor for Claude Code. Original project also ships a Python estimator script, but this repository keeps the skill self-contained and heuristic-only. Weekly Installs501Repositoryaffaan-m/everyt…ude-codeGitHub Stars144.9KFirst Seen10 days agoSecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykFailInstalled oncodex466opencode444cursor439github-copilot438antigravity438gemini-cli437
用户评价 (0)
发表评价
暂无评价
统计数据
用户评分
为此 Skill 评分