paper-context-resolver

paper-context-resolver

When to apply

• README and repo files leave a reproduction-critical gap.

• The gap concerns dataset version, split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumptions.

• The main skill needs a narrow evidence supplement instead of a full paper summary.

• There is already a concrete reproduction question to answer.

When not to apply

• The README already gives enough reproduction detail.

• The user wants a general paper explanation rather than reproduction support.

• The goal is to override README instructions without documenting the conflict.

• The only available input is a paper title and there is no concrete reproduction gap yet.

Clear boundaries

• This skill is optional.

• It supplements README-first reproduction.

• It does not replace the main orchestration flow.

• It does not summarize the whole paper by default.

Input expectations

• target repo metadata

• reproduction-critical question

• existing README or repo evidence

• any already known paper links

Output expectations

• narrowed source list

• reproduction-relevant answer only

• explicit README-paper conflict note when applicable

• clear distinction between direct evidence and inference

Notes

Use references/paper-assisted-reproduction.md. Weekly Installs509Repositorylllllllama/ai-p…on-skillGitHub Stars1First SeenTodaySecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarnInstalled onopencode509gemini-cli509deepagents509antigravity509codebuddy509github-copilot509