首页/医疗与健康/healthcare-phi-compliance
H

healthcare-phi-compliance

by @affaan-mv
4.4(20)

医疗数据隐私保护合规模式,适用于 HIPAA、DISHA、GDPR 等法规,涵盖患者数据、临床数据和财务数据的保护策略

healthcare-compliancedata-privacygdprhipaalegal-complianceGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill healthcare-phi-compliance
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1 组
使用前

开发医疗应用时手动研究 HIPAA、GDPR 等法规要求,逐字段实现数据加密、访问控制和审计日志,容易遗漏关键合规点,后期审计发现需要大规模重构,合规风险高且修复成本巨大

使用后

直接应用医疗数据合规模式库,内置字段级加密、RBAC 访问控制、完整审计日志和最小权限原则,覆盖 HIPAA、DISHA、GDPR 等主流法规,合规检查清单自动生成,开发效率提升 60%,合规风险降低 90%

SKILL.md

healthcare-phi-compliance

Healthcare PHI/PII Compliance Patterns

Patterns for protecting patient data, clinician data, and financial data in healthcare applications. Applicable to HIPAA (US), DISHA (India), GDPR (EU), and general healthcare data protection.

When to Use

  • Building any feature that touches patient records

  • Implementing access control or authentication for clinical systems

  • Designing database schemas for healthcare data

  • Building APIs that return patient or clinician data

  • Implementing audit trails or logging

  • Reviewing code for data exposure vulnerabilities

  • Setting up Row-Level Security (RLS) for multi-tenant healthcare systems

How It Works

Healthcare data protection operates on three layers: classification (what is sensitive), access control (who can see it), and audit (who did see it).

Data Classification

PHI (Protected Health Information) — any data that can identify a patient AND relates to their health: patient name, date of birth, address, phone, email, national ID numbers (SSN, Aadhaar, NHS number), medical record numbers, diagnoses, medications, lab results, imaging, insurance policy and claim details, appointment and admission records, or any combination of the above.

PII (Non-patient-sensitive data) in healthcare systems: clinician/staff personal details, doctor fee structures and payout amounts, employee salary and bank details, vendor payment information.

Access Control: Row-Level Security

ALTER TABLE patients ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;

-- Scope access by facility
CREATE POLICY "staff_read_own_facility"
  ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
  USING (facility_id IN (
    SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments
    WHERE user_id = auth.uid() AND role IN ('doctor','nurse','lab_tech','admin')
  ));

-- Audit log: insert-only (tamper-proof)
CREATE POLICY "audit_insert_only" ON audit_log FOR INSERT
  TO authenticated WITH CHECK (user_id = auth.uid());
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_modify" ON audit_log FOR UPDATE USING (false);
CREATE POLICY "audit_no_delete" ON audit_log FOR DELETE USING (false);

Audit Trail

Every PHI access or modification must be logged:

interface AuditEntry {
  timestamp: string;
  user_id: string;
  patient_id: string;
  action: 'create' | 'read' | 'update' | 'delete' | 'print' | 'export';
  resource_type: string;
  resource_id: string;
  changes?: { before: object; after: object };
  ip_address: string;
  session_id: string;
}

Common Leak Vectors

Error messages: Never include patient-identifying data in error messages thrown to the client. Log details server-side only.

Console output: Never log full patient objects. Use opaque internal record IDs (UUIDs) — not medical record numbers, national IDs, or names.

URL parameters: Never put patient-identifying data in query strings or path segments that could appear in logs or browser history. Use opaque UUIDs only.

Browser storage: Never store PHI in localStorage or sessionStorage. Keep PHI in memory only, fetch on demand.

Service role keys: Never use the service_role key in client-side code. Always use the anon/publishable key and let RLS enforce access.

Logs and monitoring: Never log full patient records. Use opaque record IDs only (not medical record numbers). Sanitize stack traces before sending to error tracking services.

Database Schema Tagging

Mark PHI/PII columns at the schema level:

COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.name IS 'PHI: patient_name';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.dob IS 'PHI: date_of_birth';
COMMENT ON COLUMN patients.aadhaar IS 'PHI: national_id';
COMMENT ON COLUMN doctor_payouts.amount IS 'PII: financial';

Deployment Checklist

Before every deployment:

  • No PHI in error messages or stack traces

  • No PHI in console.log/console.error

  • No PHI in URL parameters

  • No PHI in browser storage

  • No service_role key in client code

  • RLS enabled on all PHI/PII tables

  • Audit trail for all data modifications

  • Session timeout configured

  • API authentication on all PHI endpoints

  • Cross-facility data isolation verified

Examples

Example 1: Safe vs Unsafe Error Handling

// BAD — leaks PHI in error
throw new Error(`Patient ${patient.name} not found in ${patient.facility}`);

// GOOD — generic error, details logged server-side with opaque IDs only
logger.error('Patient lookup failed', { recordId: patient.id, facilityId });
throw new Error('Record not found');

Example 2: RLS Policy for Multi-Facility Isolation

-- Doctor at Facility A cannot see Facility B patients
CREATE POLICY "facility_isolation"
  ON patients FOR SELECT TO authenticated
  USING (facility_id IN (
    SELECT facility_id FROM staff_assignments WHERE user_id = auth.uid()
  ));

-- Test: login as doctor-facility-a, query facility-b patients
-- Expected: 0 rows returned

Example 3: Safe Logging

// BAD — logs identifiable patient data
console.log('Processing patient:', patient);

// GOOD — logs only opaque internal record ID
console.log('Processing record:', patient.id);
// Note: even patient.id should be an opaque UUID, not a medical record number

Weekly Installs491Repositoryaffaan-m/everyt…ude-codeGitHub Stars144.9KFirst Seen10 days agoSecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled oncodex457opencode435cursor430github-copilot429gemini-cli428cline428

用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价

统计数据

安装量4.7K
评分4.4 / 5.0
版本
更新日期2026年8月7日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.4(20)
5
75%
4
25%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code

时间线

创建2026年4月9日
最后更新2026年8月7日
🎁 Agent 知识卡片
调研问卷