cloud-design-patterns
提供云设计模式指导,帮助架构师通过集成平台服务、组件和数据存储来设计和构建可靠的云工作负载。
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill cloud-design-patternsBefore / After 效果对比
1 组云架构设计缺乏最佳实践指导,易出现性能瓶颈和安全漏洞。
遵循云设计模式,构建高可用、可扩展、安全的云工作负载。
cloud-design-patterns
Cloud Design Patterns
Architects design workloads by integrating platform services, functionality, and code to meet both functional and nonfunctional requirements. To design effective workloads, you must understand these requirements and select topologies and methodologies that address the challenges of your workload's constraints. Cloud design patterns provide solutions to many common challenges.
System design heavily relies on established design patterns. You can design infrastructure, code, and distributed systems by using a combination of these patterns. These patterns are crucial for building reliable, highly secure, cost-optimized, operationally efficient, and high-performing applications in the cloud.
The following cloud design patterns are technology-agnostic, which makes them suitable for any distributed system. You can apply these patterns across Azure, other cloud platforms, on-premises setups, and hybrid environments.
How Cloud Design Patterns Enhance the Design Process
Cloud workloads are vulnerable to the fallacies of distributed computing, which are common but incorrect assumptions about how distributed systems operate. Examples of these fallacies include:
-
The network is reliable.
-
Latency is zero.
-
Bandwidth is infinite.
-
The network is secure.
-
Topology doesn't change.
-
There's one administrator.
-
Component versioning is simple.
-
Observability implementation can be delayed.
These misconceptions can result in flawed workload designs. Design patterns don't eliminate these misconceptions but help raise awareness, provide compensation strategies, and provide mitigations. Each cloud design pattern has trade-offs. Focus on why you should choose a specific pattern instead of how to implement it.
References
Reference When to load
Reliability & Resilience Patterns Ambassador, Bulkhead, Circuit Breaker, Compensating Transaction, Retry, Health Endpoint Monitoring, Leader Election, Saga, Sequential Convoy
Performance Patterns Async Request-Reply, Cache-Aside, CQRS, Index Table, Materialized View, Priority Queue, Queue-Based Load Leveling, Rate Limiting, Sharding, Throttling
Messaging & Integration Patterns Choreography, Claim Check, Competing Consumers, Messaging Bridge, Pipes and Filters, Publisher-Subscriber, Scheduler Agent Supervisor
Architecture & Design Patterns Anti-Corruption Layer, Backends for Frontends, Gateway Aggregation/Offloading/Routing, Sidecar, Strangler Fig
Deployment & Operational Patterns Compute Resource Consolidation, Deployment Stamps, External Configuration Store, Geode, Static Content Hosting
Security Patterns Federated Identity, Quarantine, Valet Key
Event-Driven Architecture Patterns Event Sourcing
Best Practices & Pattern Selection Selecting appropriate patterns, Well-Architected Framework alignment, documentation, monitoring
Azure Service Mappings Common Azure services for each pattern category
Pattern Categories at a Glance
Category Patterns Focus
Reliability & Resilience 9 patterns Fault tolerance, self-healing, graceful degradation
Performance 10 patterns Caching, scaling, load management, data optimization
Messaging & Integration 7 patterns Decoupling, event-driven communication, workflow coordination
Architecture & Design 7 patterns System boundaries, API gateways, migration strategies
Deployment & Operational 5 patterns Infrastructure management, geo-distribution, configuration
Security 3 patterns Identity, access control, content validation
Event-Driven Architecture 1 pattern Event sourcing and audit trails
External Links
Weekly Installs230Repositorygithub/awesome-copilotGitHub Stars25.7KFirst Seen6 days agoSecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled ongemini-cli200codex197opencode193cursor192github-copilot190amp190
用户评价 (0)
发表评价
暂无评价
统计数据
用户评分
为此 Skill 评分