S

sf-deploy

by @jaganprov1.0.0
0.0(0)

Salesforce DevOps automation using sf CLI v2. TRIGGER when: user deploys metadata, creates/manages scratch orgs or sandboxes, sets up CI/CD pipelines, or troubleshoots deployment errors with sf project deploy. DO NOT TRIGGER when: writing Apex/LWC code (use sf-apex/sf-lwc), creating metadata XML (us

Salesforce DeploymentSalesforce DXChange SetsCI/CDCRM Release ManagementGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add jaganpro/sf-skills --skill sf-deploy
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

0

description 文档


name: sf-deploy description: > Salesforce DevOps automation using sf CLI v2. TRIGGER when: user deploys metadata, creates/manages scratch orgs or sandboxes, sets up CI/CD pipelines, or troubleshoots deployment errors with sf project deploy. DO NOT TRIGGER when: writing Apex/LWC code (use sf-apex/sf-lwc), creating metadata XML (use sf-metadata), or querying org data (use sf-data). license: MIT metadata: version: "2.2.0" author: "Jag Valaiyapathy"

sf-deploy: Comprehensive Salesforce DevOps Automation

Use this skill when the user needs deployment orchestration: dry-run validation, targeted or manifest-based deploys, CI/CD workflow advice, scratch-org management, failure triage, or safe rollout sequencing for Salesforce metadata.

When This Skill Owns the Task

Use sf-deploy when the work involves:

  • sf project deploy start, quick, report, or retrieval workflows
  • release sequencing across objects, permission sets, Apex, and Flows
  • CI/CD gates, test-level selection, or deployment reports
  • troubleshooting deployment failures and dependency ordering

Delegate elsewhere when the user is:


Critical Operating Rules

  • Use sf CLI v2 only.
  • On non-source-tracking orgs, deploy/retrieve commands require an explicit scope such as --source-dir, --metadata, or --manifest.
  • Prefer --dry-run first before real deploys.
  • For Flows, deploy safely and activate only after validation.

Default deployment order

| Phase | Metadata | |---|---| | 1 | Custom objects / fields | | 2 | Permission sets | | 3 | Apex | | 4 | Flows as Draft | | 5 | Flow activation / post-verify |

This ordering prevents many dependency and FLS failures.


Required Context to Gather First

Ask for or infer:

  • target org alias and environment type
  • deployment scope: source-dir, metadata list, or manifest
  • whether this is validate-only, deploy, quick deploy, retrieve, or CI/CD guidance
  • required test level and rollback expectations
  • whether special metadata types are involved (Flow, permission sets, agents, packages)

Preflight checks:

sf --version
sf org list
sf org display --target-org <alias> --json
test -f sfdx-project.json

Recommended Workflow

1. Preflight

Confirm auth, repo shape, package directories, and target scope.

2. Validate first

sf project deploy start --dry-run --source-dir force-app --target-org <alias> --wait 30 --json

Use manifest- or metadata-scoped validation when the change set is targeted.

3. Deploy the smallest correct scope

# source-dir deploy
sf project deploy start --source-dir force-app --target-org <alias> --wait 30 --json

# manifest deploy
sf project deploy start --manifest manifest/package.xml --target-org <alias> --test-level RunLocalTests --wait 30 --json

# quick deploy after successful validation
sf project deploy quick --job-id <validation-job-id> --target-org <alias> --json

4. Verify

sf project deploy report --job-id <job-id> --target-org <alias> --json

Then verify tests, Flow state, permission assignments, and smoke-test behavior.

5. Report clearly

Summarize what deployed, what failed, what was skipped, and what the next safe action is.

Output template: references/deployment-report-template.md


High-Signal Failure Patterns

| Error / symptom | Likely cause | Default fix direction | |---|---|---| | FIELD_CUSTOM_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION | validation rule or bad test data | adjust data or rule timing | | INVALID_CROSS_REFERENCE_KEY | missing dependency | include referenced metadata first | | CANNOT_INSERT_UPDATE_ACTIVATE_ENTITY | trigger / Flow / validation side effect | inspect automation stack and failing logic | | tests fail during deploy | broken code or fragile tests | run targeted tests, fix root cause, revalidate | | field/object not found in permset | wrong order | deploy objects/fields before permission sets | | Flow invalid / version conflict | dependency or activation problem | deploy as Draft, verify, then activate |

Full workflows: references/orchestration.md, references/trigger-deployment-safety.md


CI/CD Guidance

Default pipeline shape:

  1. authenticate
  2. validate repo / org state
  3. static analysis
  4. dry-run deploy
  5. tests + coverage gates
  6. deploy
  7. verify + notify

Static analysis now uses Code Analyzer v5 (sf code-analyzer), not retired sf scanner.

Deep reference: references/deployment-workflows.md


Agentforce Deployment Note

Use this skill to orchestrate deployment/publish sequencing around agents, but use the agent-specific skills for authoring decisions:

For full agent DevOps details, including Agent: pseudo metadata, publish/activate, and sync-between-orgs, see:


Cross-Skill Integration

| Need | Delegate to | Reason | |---|---|---| | custom object / field creation | sf-metadata | define metadata before deploy | | Apex compile / review / fixes | sf-apex | code authoring and repair | | Flow creation / repair | sf-flow | Flow authoring and activation guidance | | test data or seed records | sf-data | realistic validation data | | Agent Script build/publish readiness | sf-ai-agentscript | agent-specific correctness |


Reference Map

Start here

Specialized deployment safety


Score Guide

| Score | Meaning | |---|---| | 90+ | strong deployment plan and execution guidance | | 75–89 | good deploy guidance with minor review items | | 60–74 | partial coverage of deployment risk | | < 60 | insufficient confidence; tighten plan before rollout |


Completion Format

Deployment goal: <validate / deploy / retrieve / pipeline>
Target org: <alias>
Scope: <source-dir / metadata / manifest>
Result: <passed / failed / partial>
Key findings: <errors, ordering, tests, skipped items>
Next step: <safe follow-up action>

forum用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价,来写第一条吧

统计数据

安装量0
评分0.0 / 5.0
版本1.0.0
更新日期2026年3月17日
对比案例0 组

用户评分

0.0(0)
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code

时间线

创建2026年3月17日
最后更新2026年3月17日