首页/后端开发/go-error-handling
G

go-error-handling

by @cxuuv1.0.0
0.0(0)

Use when writing Go code that returns, wraps, or handles errors — choosing between sentinel errors, custom types, and fmt.Errorf (%w vs %v), structuring error flow, or deciding whether to log or return. Also use when propagating errors across package boundaries or using errors.Is/As, even if the use

Go LanguageError ManagementException HandlingRobust CodeGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add cxuu/golang-skills --skill go-error-handling
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

0

description 文档


name: go-error-handling description: Use when writing Go code that returns, wraps, or handles errors — choosing between sentinel errors, custom types, and fmt.Errorf (%w vs %v), structuring error flow, or deciding whether to log or return. Also use when propagating errors across package boundaries or using errors.Is/As, even if the user doesn't ask about error strategy. Does not cover panic/recover patterns (see go-defensive). license: Apache-2.0 compatibility: Requires Go 1.13+ for errors.Is/errors.As and fmt.Errorf %w wrapping. Structured logging examples use slog (Go 1.21+). metadata: sources: "Google Style Guide, Uber Style Guide" allowed-tools: Bash(bash:*)

Go Error Handling

Available Scripts

  • scripts/check-errors.sh — Detects error handling anti-patterns: string comparison on err.Error(), bare return err without context, and log-and-return violations. Run bash scripts/check-errors.sh --help for options.

In Go, errors are values — they are created by code and consumed by code.

Choosing an Error Strategy

  1. System boundary (RPC, IPC, storage)? → Wrap with %v to avoid leaking internals
  2. Caller needs to match specific conditions? → Sentinel or typed error, wrap with %w
  3. Caller just needs debugging context? → fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err)
  4. Leaf function, no wrapping needed? → Return the error directly

Default: wrap with %w and place it at the end of the format string.


Core Rules

Never Return Concrete Error Types

Never return concrete error types from exported functions — a concrete nil pointer can become a non-nil interface:

// Bad: Concrete type can cause subtle bugs
func Bad() *os.PathError { /*...*/ }

// Good: Always return the error interface
func Good() error { /*...*/ }

Error Strings

Error strings should not be capitalized and should not end with punctuation. Exception: exported names, proper nouns, or acronyms.

// Bad
err := fmt.Errorf("Something bad happened.")

// Good
err := fmt.Errorf("something bad happened")

For displayed messages (logs, test failures, API responses), capitalization is appropriate.

Return Values on Error

When a function returns an error, callers must treat all non-error return values as unspecified unless explicitly documented.

Tip: Functions taking a context.Context should usually return an error so callers can determine if the context was cancelled.


Handling Errors

When encountering an error, make a deliberate choice — do not discard with _:

  1. Handle immediately — address the error and continue
  2. Return to caller — optionally wrapped with context
  3. In exceptional caseslog.Fatal or panic

To intentionally ignore: add a comment explaining why.

n, _ := b.Write(p) // never returns a non-nil error

For related concurrent operations, use errgroup:

g, ctx := errgroup.WithContext(ctx)
g.Go(func() error { return task1(ctx) })
g.Go(func() error { return task2(ctx) })
if err := g.Wait(); err != nil { return err }

Avoid In-Band Errors

Don't return -1, nil, or empty string to signal errors. Use multiple returns:

// Bad: In-band error value
func Lookup(key string) int  // returns -1 for missing

// Good: Explicit error or ok value
func Lookup(key string) (string, bool)

This prevents callers from writing Parse(Lookup(key)) — it causes a compile-time error since Lookup(key) has 2 outputs.


Error Flow

Handle errors before normal code. Early returns keep the happy path unindented:

// Good: Error first, normal code unindented
if err != nil {
    return err
}
// normal code

Handle errors once — either log or return, never both:

Error encountered?
├─ Caller can act on it? → Return (with context via %w)
├─ Top of call chain? → Log and handle
└─ Neither? → Log at appropriate level, continue

Read references/ERROR-FLOW.md when structuring complex error flows, deciding between logging vs returning, implementing the handle-once pattern, or choosing structured logging levels.


Error Types

Advisory: Recommended best practice.

| Caller needs to match? | Message type | Use | |------------------------|--------------|-----| | No | static | errors.New("message") | | No | dynamic | fmt.Errorf("msg: %v", val) | | Yes | static | var ErrFoo = errors.New("...") | | Yes | dynamic | custom error type |

Default: Wrap with fmt.Errorf("...: %w", err). Escalate to sentinels for errors.Is(), to custom types for errors.As().

Read references/ERROR-TYPES.md when defining sentinel errors, creating custom error types, or choosing error strategies for a package API.


Error Wrapping

Advisory: Recommended best practice.

  • Use %v: At system boundaries, for logging, to hide internal details
  • Use %w: To preserve error chain for errors.Is/errors.As

Key rules: Place %w at the end. Add context callers don't have. If annotation adds nothing, return err directly.

Read references/WRAPPING.md when deciding between %v and %w, wrapping errors across package boundaries, or adding contextual information.

Validation: After implementing error handling, run bash scripts/check-errors.sh to detect common anti-patterns. Then run go vet ./... to catch additional issues.


Related Skills

  • Error naming: See go-naming when naming sentinel errors (ErrFoo) or custom error types
  • Testing errors: See go-testing when testing error semantics with errors.Is/errors.As or writing error-checking helpers
  • Panic handling: See go-defensive when deciding between panic and error returns, or writing recover guards
  • Guard clauses: See go-control-flow when structuring early-return error flow or reducing nesting
  • Logging decisions: See go-logging when choosing log levels, configuring structured logging, or deciding what context to include in log messages

forum用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价,来写第一条吧

统计数据

安装量0
评分0.0 / 5.0
版本1.0.0
更新日期2026年3月17日
对比案例0 组

用户评分

0.0(0)
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code

时间线

创建2026年3月17日
最后更新2026年3月17日