首页/DevOps/auto-updater
A

auto-updater

by @adaptationiov1.0.0
0.0(0)

Automatically apply improvements to skills and the ecosystem based on system-reviewer findings and best-practices-learner insights. Workflow for automated improvement identification, priority assessment, safe application, validation, and rollback capability. Use when applying systematic improvements

Software UpdatesDeployment AutomationVersion ControlCI/CDSystem MaintenanceGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add adaptationio/skrillz --skill auto-updater
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

0

description 文档


name: auto-updater description: Automatically apply improvements to skills and the ecosystem based on system-reviewer findings and best-practices-learner insights. Workflow for automated improvement identification, priority assessment, safe application, validation, and rollback capability. Use when applying systematic improvements, automating enhancement cycles, bulk updating multiple skills, or implementing ecosystem-wide improvements. allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, WebSearch, WebFetch

Auto Updater

Overview

auto-updater automatically applies improvements to skills and ecosystem components based on identified patterns and learnings.

Purpose: Automated application of validated improvements across ecosystem

The 5-Step Auto-Update Workflow:

  1. Identify Improvements - Gather recommendations from reviews and learnings
  2. Assess Safety - Determine which can be safely automated
  3. Apply Updates - Implement improvements automatically
  4. Validate Changes - Ensure improvements effective, no regressions
  5. Rollback if Needed - Revert changes if validation fails

Safety: Always validates before finalizing, can rollback

When to Use

  • Applying systematic improvements across multiple skills
  • Implementing guideline updates ecosystem-wide
  • Automating common enhancement patterns
  • Bulk updates (e.g., add Quick Reference to all skills missing it)

Auto-Update Workflow

Step 1: Identify Improvements

Sources:

  • system-reviewer recommendations
  • best-practices-learner documented patterns
  • review-multi common findings
  • Manual improvement requests

Output: List of potential improvements

Time: 15-30 minutes


Step 2: Assess Safety

Safe to Automate:

  • Structural additions (add Quick Reference section)
  • Content additions (add examples in standard locations)
  • Format standardization (consistent heading levels)
  • Documentation updates (README enhancements)

NOT Safe to Automate:

  • Logic changes (requires understanding context)
  • Content rewrites (needs judgment)
  • Major refactoring (risk too high)
  • Custom implementations

Output: Classified improvements (auto-safe vs manual-only)

Time: 20-40 minutes


Step 3: Apply Updates

Process:

  1. Backup affected skills (git commit or copy)
  2. Apply improvement to each skill
  3. Log changes made
  4. Track success/failure per skill

Approach: One skill at a time, validate each before moving to next

Time: Varies by improvement and skill count


Step 4: Validate Changes

For Each Updated Skill:

  1. Run skill-validator (pass/fail)
  2. Run review-multi structure check (score maintained?)
  3. Visual inspection (looks correct?)
  4. Mark as validated or flagged for review

Output: Validation results per skill

Time: 10-15 minutes per skill


Step 5: Rollback if Needed

If Validation Fails:

  1. Identify which skill failed
  2. Restore from backup (git revert or copy back)
  3. Analyze why it failed
  4. Mark improvement as manual-only for that skill

Output: Rolled back skill, failure analysis


Example Auto-Update

Auto-Update: Add Quick Reference to All Skills Missing It

Step 1: Identify
- Improvements: Add Quick Reference section
- Target Skills: planning-architect, task-development, todo-management
- Count: 3 skills to update

Step 2: Assess Safety
- ✅ Safe: Adding new section (doesn't modify existing content)
- ✅ Safe: Standard format (use template)
- ✅ Safe: Low risk (can validate easily)
- Decision: Auto-update approved

Step 3: Apply
- Backup: Git commit all 3 skills
- Apply to planning-architect: ✅ Success
- Apply to task-development: ✅ Success
- Apply to todo-management: ✅ Success
- Changes: 3/3 skills updated

Step 4: Validate
- planning-architect: 5/5 structure (maintained)
- task-development: 5/5 structure (maintained)
- todo-management: 5/5 structure (maintained)
- All validations: ✅ PASS

Step 5: Rollback
- Not needed (all validations passed)

Result: ✅ 3 skills successfully auto-updated
Time: 90 minutes (vs 3-4 hours manual)
Impact: 100% Quick Reference coverage achieved
Quality: All skills maintained 5/5 scores

Quick Reference

5-Step Auto-Update Workflow

| Step | Focus | Time | Safety | |------|-------|------|--------| | Identify | Gather improvements | 15-30m | N/A | | Assess Safety | Classify auto-safe | 20-40m | Critical | | Apply | Implement changes | Varies | Backup first | | Validate | Check quality maintained | 10-15m/skill | Essential | | Rollback | Revert if fails | 5m/skill | Safety net |

Safe vs Unsafe Automation

Safe to Automate:

  • Adding standard sections
  • Format standardization
  • Documentation additions
  • Structural improvements (following patterns)

NOT Safe:

  • Logic changes
  • Content rewrites
  • Major refactoring
  • Custom implementations

Rule: If requires judgment or understanding → Manual only


auto-updater enables safe, validated, automated improvement application across multiple skills simultaneously.

forum用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价,来写第一条吧

统计数据

安装量0
评分0.0 / 5.0
版本1.0.0
更新日期2026年3月17日
对比案例0 组

用户评分

0.0(0)
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code

时间线

创建2026年3月17日
最后更新2026年3月17日