mirofish-offline-simulation
MiroFish 离线仿真引擎,生成数百个 AI 代理模拟公众对文档的社交媒体反应,本地运行无需联网
npx skills add aradotso/trending-skills --skill mirofish-offline-simulationBefore / After 效果对比
1 组发布内容后等待真实反馈,无法提前预测反应,风险高且事后补救成本大,一次舆情危机损失巨大
发布前模拟不同人格的用户反应,提前发现争议点和传播路径,优化内容策略,规避大部分舆论风险
description SKILL.md
mirofish-offline-simulation
MiroFish-Offline Skill
Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
MiroFish-Offline is a fully local multi-agent swarm intelligence engine. Feed it any document (press release, policy draft, financial report) and it generates hundreds of AI agents with unique personalities that simulate public reaction on social media — posts, arguments, opinion shifts — hour by hour. No cloud APIs required: Neo4j CE 5.15 handles graph memory, Ollama serves the LLMs.
Architecture Overview
Document Input
│
▼
Graph Build (NER + relationship extraction via Ollama LLM)
│
▼
Neo4j Knowledge Graph (entities, relations, embeddings via nomic-embed-text)
│
▼
Env Setup (generate hundreds of agent personas with personalities + memory)
│
▼
Simulation (agents post, reply, argue, shift opinions on simulated platforms)
│
▼
Report (ReportAgent interviews focus group, queries graph, generates analysis)
│
▼
Interaction (chat with any individual agent, full memory persists)
Backend: Flask + Python 3.11
Frontend: Vue 3 + Node 18
Graph DB: Neo4j CE 5.15 (bolt protocol)
LLM: Ollama (OpenAI-compatible /v1 endpoint)
Embeddings: nomic-embed-text (768-dimensional, via Ollama)
Search: Hybrid — 0.7 × vector similarity + 0.3 × BM25
Installation
Option A: Docker (Recommended)
git clone https://github.com/nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline.git
cd MiroFish-Offline
cp .env.example .env
# Start Neo4j + Ollama + MiroFish backend + frontend
docker compose up -d
# Pull required models into the Ollama container
docker exec mirofish-ollama ollama pull qwen2.5:32b
docker exec mirofish-ollama ollama pull nomic-embed-text
# Check all services are healthy
docker compose ps
Open http://localhost:3000.
Option B: Manual Setup
1. Neo4j
docker run -d --name neo4j \
-p 7474:7474 -p 7687:7687 \
-e NEO4J_AUTH=neo4j/mirofish \
neo4j:5.15-community
2. Ollama
ollama serve &
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b # Main LLM (~20GB, requires 24GB VRAM)
ollama pull qwen2.5:14b # Lighter option (~10GB VRAM)
ollama pull nomic-embed-text # Embeddings (small, fast)
3. Backend
cp .env.example .env
# Edit .env (see Configuration section)
cd backend
pip install -r requirements.txt
python run.py
# Backend starts on http://localhost:5000
4. Frontend
cd frontend
npm install
npm run dev
# Frontend starts on http://localhost:3000
Configuration (.env)
# ── LLM (Ollama OpenAI-compatible endpoint) ──────────────────────────
LLM_API_KEY=ollama
LLM_BASE_URL=http://localhost:11434/v1
LLM_MODEL_NAME=qwen2.5:32b
# ── Neo4j ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
NEO4J_URI=bolt://localhost:7687
NEO4J_USER=neo4j
NEO4J_PASSWORD=mirofish
# ── Embeddings (Ollama) ───────────────────────────────────────────────
EMBEDDING_MODEL=nomic-embed-text
EMBEDDING_BASE_URL=http://localhost:11434
# ── Optional: swap Ollama for any OpenAI-compatible provider ─────────
# LLM_API_KEY=$OPENAI_API_KEY
# LLM_BASE_URL=https://api.openai.com/v1
# LLM_MODEL_NAME=gpt-4o
Core Python API
GraphStorage Interface
The abstraction layer between MiroFish and the graph database:
from backend.storage.base import GraphStorage
from backend.storage.neo4j_storage import Neo4jStorage
# Initialize storage (typically done via Flask app.extensions)
storage = Neo4jStorage(
uri=os.environ["NEO4J_URI"],
user=os.environ["NEO4J_USER"],
password=os.environ["NEO4J_PASSWORD"],
embedding_model=os.environ["EMBEDDING_MODEL"],
embedding_base_url=os.environ["EMBEDDING_BASE_URL"],
llm_base_url=os.environ["LLM_BASE_URL"],
llm_api_key=os.environ["LLM_API_KEY"],
llm_model=os.environ["LLM_MODEL_NAME"],
)
Building a Knowledge Graph from a Document
from backend.services.graph_builder import GraphBuilder
builder = GraphBuilder(storage=storage)
# Feed a document string
with open("press_release.txt", "r") as f:
document_text = f.read()
# Extract entities + relationships, store in Neo4j
graph_id = builder.build(
content=document_text,
title="Q4 Earnings Report",
source_type="financial_report",
)
print(f"Graph built: {graph_id}")
# Returns a graph_id used for subsequent simulation runs
Creating and Running a Simulation
from backend.services.simulation import SimulationService
sim = SimulationService(storage=storage)
# Create a simulation environment from an existing graph
sim_id = sim.create_environment(
graph_id=graph_id,
agent_count=200, # Number of agents to generate
simulation_hours=24, # Simulated time span
platform="twitter", # "twitter" | "reddit" | "weibo"
)
# Run the simulation (blocking — use async wrapper for production)
result = sim.run(sim_id=sim_id)
print(f"Simulation complete. Posts generated: {result['post_count']}")
print(f"Sentiment trajectory: {result['sentiment_over_time']}")
Querying Simulation Results
from backend.services.report import ReportAgent
report_agent = ReportAgent(storage=storage)
# Generate a structured analysis report
report = report_agent.generate(
sim_id=sim_id,
focus_group_size=10, # Number of agents to interview
include_graph_search=True,
)
print(report["summary"])
print(report["key_narratives"])
print(report["sentiment_shift"])
print(report["influential_agents"])
Chatting with a Simulated Agent
from backend.services.agent_chat import AgentChatService
chat = AgentChatService(storage=storage)
# List agents from a completed simulation
agents = chat.list_agents(sim_id=sim_id, limit=10)
agent_id = agents[0]["id"]
print(f"Chatting with: {agents[0]['persona']['name']}")
print(f"Personality: {agents[0]['persona']['traits']}")
# Send a message — agent responds in-character with full memory
response = chat.send(
agent_id=agent_id,
message="Why did you post that criticism about the earnings report?",
)
print(response["reply"])
# → Agent responds using its personality, opinion bias, and post history
Hybrid Search on the Knowledge Graph
from backend.services.search import SearchService
search = SearchService(storage=storage)
# Hybrid search: 0.7 * vector similarity + 0.3 * BM25
results = search.query(
text="executive compensation controversy",
graph_id=graph_id,
top_k=5,
vector_weight=0.7,
bm25_weight=0.3,
)
for r in results:
print(r["entity"], r["relationship"], r["score"])
Implementing a Custom GraphStorage Backend
from backend.storage.base import GraphStorage
from typing import List, Dict, Any
class MyCustomStorage(GraphStorage):
"""
Swap Neo4j for any graph DB by implementing this interface.
Register via Flask app.extensions['neo4j_storage'] = MyCustomStorage(...)
"""
def store_entity(self, entity: Dict[str, Any]) -> str:
# Store entity, return entity_id
raise NotImplementedError
def store_relationship(
self,
source_id: str,
target_id: str,
relation_type: str,
properties: Dict[str, Any],
) -> str:
raise NotImplementedError
def vector_search(
self, embedding: List[float], top_k: int = 5
) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
raise NotImplementedError
def keyword_search(
self, query: str, top_k: int = 5
) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
raise NotImplementedError
def get_agent_memory(self, agent_id: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
raise NotImplementedError
def update_agent_memory(
self, agent_id: str, memory_update: Dict[str, Any]
) -> None:
raise NotImplementedError
Flask App Integration Pattern
# backend/app.py — how storage is wired via dependency injection
from flask import Flask
from backend.storage.neo4j_storage import Neo4jStorage
import os
def create_app():
app = Flask(__name__)
# Single storage instance, injected everywhere via app.extensions
storage = Neo4jStorage(
uri=os.environ["NEO4J_URI"],
user=os.environ["NEO4J_USER"],
password=os.environ["NEO4J_PASSWORD"],
embedding_model=os.environ["EMBEDDING_MODEL"],
embedding_base_url=os.environ["EMBEDDING_BASE_URL"],
llm_base_url=os.environ["LLM_BASE_URL"],
llm_api_key=os.environ["LLM_API_KEY"],
llm_model=os.environ["LLM_MODEL_NAME"],
)
app.extensions["neo4j_storage"] = storage
from backend.routes import graph_bp, simulation_bp, report_bp
app.register_blueprint(graph_bp)
app.register_blueprint(simulation_bp)
app.register_blueprint(report_bp)
return app
Accessing Storage in a Flask Route
from flask import Blueprint, current_app, request, jsonify
simulation_bp = Blueprint("simulation", __name__)
@simulation_bp.route("/api/simulation/run", methods=["POST"])
def run_simulation():
storage = current_app.extensions["neo4j_storage"]
data = request.json
sim = SimulationService(storage=storage)
sim_id = sim.create_environment(
graph_id=data["graph_id"],
agent_count=data.get("agent_count", 200),
simulation_hours=data.get("simulation_hours", 24),
)
result = sim.run(sim_id=sim_id)
return jsonify(result)
REST API Reference
Method Endpoint Description
POST
/api/graph/build
Upload document, build knowledge graph
GET
/api/graph/:id
Get graph entities and relationships
POST
/api/simulation/create
Create simulation environment
POST
/api/simulation/run
Execute simulation
GET
/api/simulation/:id/results
Get posts, sentiment, metrics
GET
/api/simulation/:id/agents
List generated agents
POST
/api/report/generate
Generate ReportAgent analysis
POST
/api/agent/:id/chat
Chat with a specific agent
GET
/api/search
Hybrid search the knowledge graph
Example: Build graph from document
curl -X POST http://localhost:5000/api/graph/build \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"content": "Acme Corp announces record Q4 earnings, CFO resigns...",
"title": "Q4 Press Release",
"source_type": "press_release"
}'
# → {"graph_id": "g_abc123", "entities": 47, "relationships": 89}
Example: Run a simulation
curl -X POST http://localhost:5000/api/simulation/run \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"graph_id": "g_abc123",
"agent_count": 150,
"simulation_hours": 12,
"platform": "twitter"
}'
# → {"sim_id": "s_xyz789", "status": "running"}
Hardware Selection Guide
Use Case Model VRAM RAM
Quick test / dev
qwen2.5:7b
6 GB
16 GB
Balanced quality
qwen2.5:14b
10 GB
16 GB
Production quality
qwen2.5:32b
24 GB
32 GB
CPU-only (slow)
qwen2.5:7b
None
16 GB
Switch model by editing .env:
LLM_MODEL_NAME=qwen2.5:14b
Then restart the backend — no other changes needed.
Common Patterns
PR Crisis Test Pipeline
import os
from backend.storage.neo4j_storage import Neo4jStorage
from backend.services.graph_builder import GraphBuilder
from backend.services.simulation import SimulationService
from backend.services.report import ReportAgent
storage = Neo4jStorage(
uri=os.environ["NEO4J_URI"],
user=os.environ["NEO4J_USER"],
password=os.environ["NEO4J_PASSWORD"],
embedding_model=os.environ["EMBEDDING_MODEL"],
embedding_base_url=os.environ["EMBEDDING_BASE_URL"],
llm_base_url=os.environ["LLM_BASE_URL"],
llm_api_key=os.environ["LLM_API_KEY"],
llm_model=os.environ["LLM_MODEL_NAME"],
)
def test_press_release(text: str) -> dict:
# 1. Build knowledge graph
builder = GraphBuilder(storage=storage)
graph_id = builder.build(content=text, title="Draft PR", source_type="press_release")
# 2. Simulate public reaction
sim = SimulationService(storage=storage)
sim_id = sim.create_environment(graph_id=graph_id, agent_count=300, simulation_hours=48)
sim.run(sim_id=sim_id)
# 3. Generate report
report = ReportAgent(storage=storage).generate(sim_id=sim_id, focus_group_size=15)
return {
"sentiment_peak": report["sentiment_over_time"][0],
"key_narratives": report["key_narratives"],
"risk_score": report["risk_score"],
"recommended_edits": report["recommendations"],
}
# Usage
with open("draft_announcement.txt") as f:
result = test_press_release(f.read())
print(f"Risk score: {result['risk_score']}/10")
print(f"Top narrative: {result['key_narratives'][0]}")
Use Any OpenAI-Compatible Provider
# Claude via Anthropic (or any proxy)
LLM_API_KEY=$ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
LLM_BASE_URL=https://api.anthropic.com/v1
LLM_MODEL_NAME=claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022
# OpenAI
LLM_API_KEY=$OPENAI_API_KEY
LLM_BASE_URL=https://api.openai.com/v1
LLM_MODEL_NAME=gpt-4o
# Local LM Studio
LLM_API_KEY=lm-studio
LLM_BASE_URL=http://localhost:1234/v1
LLM_MODEL_NAME=your-loaded-model
Troubleshooting
Neo4j connection refused
# Check Neo4j is running
docker ps | grep neo4j
# Check bolt port
nc -zv localhost 7687
# View Neo4j logs
docker logs neo4j --tail 50
Ollama model not found
# List available models
ollama list
# Pull missing models
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b
ollama pull nomic-embed-text
# Check Ollama is serving
curl http://localhost:11434/api/tags
Out of VRAM
# Switch to smaller model in .env
LLM_MODEL_NAME=qwen2.5:14b # or qwen2.5:7b
# Restart backend
cd backend && python run.py
Embeddings dimension mismatch
# nomic-embed-text produces 768-dim vectors
# If you switch embedding models, drop and recreate the Neo4j vector index:
# In Neo4j browser (http://localhost:7474):
# DROP INDEX entity_embedding IF EXISTS;
# Then restart MiroFish — it recreates the index with correct dimensions.
Docker Compose: Ollama container can't access GPU
# docker-compose.yml — add GPU reservation:
services:
ollama:
deploy:
resources:
reservations:
devices:
- driver: nvidia
count: 1
capabilities: [gpu]
Slow simulation on CPU
-
Use
qwen2.5:7bfor faster (lower quality) inference -
Reduce
agent_countto 50–100 for testing -
Reduce
simulation_hoursto 6–12 -
CPU inference with 7b model: expect ~5–10 tokens/sec
Frontend can't reach backend
# Check VITE_API_BASE_URL in frontend/.env
VITE_API_BASE_URL=http://localhost:5000
# Verify backend is up
curl http://localhost:5000/api/health
Project Structure
MiroFish-Offline/
├── backend/
│ ├── run.py # Entry point
│ ├── app.py # Flask factory, DI wiring
│ ├── storage/
│ │ ├── base.py # GraphStorage abstract interface
│ │ └── neo4j_storage.py # Neo4j implementation
│ ├── services/
│ │ ├── graph_builder.py # NER + relationship extraction
│ │ ├── simulation.py # Agent simulation engine
│ │ ├── report.py # ReportAgent + focus group
│ │ ├── agent_chat.py # Per-agent chat interface
│ │ └── search.py # Hybrid vector + BM25 search
│ └── routes/
│ ├── graph.py
│ ├── simulation.py
│ └── report.py
├── frontend/ # Vue 3 (fully English UI)
├── docker-compose.yml
├── .env.example
└── README.md
Weekly Installs242Repositoryaradotso/trending-skillsGitHub Stars8First Seen5 days agoSecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubFailSocketPassSnykFailInstalled onopencode241github-copilot241codex241amp241cline241kimi-cli241
forum用户评价 (0)
发表评价
暂无评价,来写第一条吧
统计数据
用户评分
为此 Skill 评分