D

digest

by @anthropicsv1.0.0
4.2(8)

扫描所有连接信息源的近期活动,智能生成个性化摘要,快速掌握团队动态和重要信息

content-curationnews-aggregationinformation-retrievalautomationGitHub
安装方式
npx skills add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill digest
compare_arrows

Before / After 效果对比

1
使用前

分别打开邮件、Slack、项目管理工具、文档协作平台等多个信息源,手动筛选重要内容,整理成日报或周报,耗时 40 分钟

使用后

自动从所有连接的信息源收集活动,智能识别重要事项和决策点,生成结构化摘要,5 分钟获得完整信息概览

description SKILL.md

digest

Digest Command

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Scan recent activity across all connected sources and generate a structured digest highlighting what matters.

Instructions

1. Parse Flags

Determine the time window from the user's input:

  • --daily — Last 24 hours (default if no flag specified)

  • --weekly — Last 7 days

The user may also specify a custom range:

  • --since yesterday

  • --since Monday

  • --since 2025-01-20

2. Check Available Sources

Identify which MCP sources are connected (same approach as the search command):

  • ~~chat — channels, DMs, mentions

  • ~~email — inbox, sent, threads

  • ~~cloud storage — recently modified docs shared with user

  • ~~project tracker — tasks assigned, completed, commented on

  • ~~CRM — opportunity updates, account activity

  • ~~knowledge base — recently updated wiki pages

If no sources are connected, guide the user:

To generate a digest, you'll need at least one source connected.
Check your MCP settings to add ~~chat, ~~email, ~~cloud storage, or other tools.

3. Gather Activity from Each Source

~~chat:

  • Search for messages mentioning the user (to:me)

  • Check channels the user is in for recent activity

  • Look for threads the user participated in

  • Identify new messages in key channels

~~email:

  • Search recent inbox messages

  • Identify threads with new replies

  • Flag emails with action items or questions directed at the user

~~cloud storage:

  • Find documents recently modified or shared with the user

  • Note new comments on docs the user owns or collaborates on

~~project tracker:

  • Tasks assigned to the user (new or updated)

  • Tasks completed by others that the user follows

  • Comments on tasks the user is involved with

~~CRM:

  • Opportunity stage changes

  • New activities logged on accounts the user owns

  • Updated contacts or accounts

~~knowledge base:

  • Recently updated documents in relevant collections

  • New documents created in watched areas

4. Identify Key Items

From all gathered activity, extract and categorize:

Action Items:

  • Direct requests made to the user ("Can you...", "Please...", "@user")

  • Tasks assigned or due soon

  • Questions awaiting the user's response

  • Review requests

Decisions:

  • Conclusions reached in threads or emails

  • Approvals or rejections

  • Policy or direction changes

Mentions:

  • Times the user was mentioned or referenced

  • Discussions about the user's projects or areas

Updates:

  • Status changes on projects the user follows

  • Document updates in the user's domain

  • Completed items the user was waiting on

5. Group by Topic

Organize the digest by topic, project, or theme rather than by source. Merge related activity across sources:

## Project Aurora
- ~~chat: Design review thread concluded — team chose Option B (#design, Tuesday)
- ~~email: Sarah sent updated spec incorporating feedback (Wednesday)
- ~~cloud storage: "Aurora API Spec v3" updated by Sarah (Wednesday)
- ~~project tracker: 3 tasks moved to In Progress, 2 completed

## Budget Planning
- ~~email: Finance team requesting Q2 projections by Friday
- ~~chat: Todd shared template in #finance (Monday)
- ~~cloud storage: "Q2 Budget Template" shared with you (Monday)

6. Format the Digest

Structure the output clearly:

# [Daily/Weekly] Digest — [Date or Date Range]

Sources scanned: ~~chat, ~~email, ~~cloud storage, [others]

## Action Items (X items)
- [ ] [Action item 1] — from [person], [source] ([date])
- [ ] [Action item 2] — from [person], [source] ([date])

## Decisions Made
- [Decision 1] — [context] ([source], [date])
- [Decision 2] — [context] ([source], [date])

## [Topic/Project Group 1]
[Activity summary with source attribution]

## [Topic/Project Group 2]
[Activity summary with source attribution]

## Mentions
- [Mention context] — [source] ([date])

## Documents Updated
- [Doc name] — [who modified, what changed] ([date])

7. Handle Unavailable Sources

If any source fails or is unreachable:

Note: Could not reach [source name] for this digest.
The following sources were included: [list of successful sources].

Do not let one failed source prevent the digest from being generated. Produce the best digest possible from available sources.

8. Summary Stats

End with a quick summary:

---
[X] action items · [Y] decisions · [Z] mentions · [W] doc updates
Across [N] sources · Covering [time range]

Notes

  • Default to --daily if no flag is specified

  • Group by topic/project, not by source — users care about what happened, not where it happened

  • Action items should always be listed first — they are the most actionable part of a digest

  • Deduplicate cross-source activity (same decision in ~~chat and email = one entry)

  • For weekly digests, prioritize significance over completeness — highlight what matters, skip noise

  • If the user has a memory system (CLAUDE.md), use it to decode people names and project references

  • Include enough context in each item that the user can decide whether to dig deeper without clicking through

Weekly Installs322Repositoryanthropics/know…-pluginsGitHub Stars10.6KFirst SeenMar 13, 2026Security AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled oncodex308gemini-cli306opencode305cursor305kimi-cli304github-copilot304

forum用户评价 (0)

发表评价

效果
易用性
文档
兼容性

暂无评价,来写第一条吧

统计数据

安装量200
评分4.2 / 5.0
版本1.0.0
更新日期2026年3月31日
对比案例1 组

用户评分

4.2(8)
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

为此 Skill 评分

0.0

兼容平台

🔧Claude Code

时间线

创建2026年3月31日
最后更新2026年3月31日