M

microservices-architect

by @jeffallanv
4.3(61)

Specializes in distributed system architecture design, adept at breaking down traditional monolithic applications into microservices to enhance system scalability, resilience, and maintainability.

microservicessystem-architecturedistributed-systemsdockerkubernetesGitHub
Installation
npx skills add jeffallan/claude-skills --skill microservices-architect
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

1
Before

Traditional monolithic application architectures are complex, difficult to scale, and have a large fault impact scope. This leads to high system maintenance costs, difficulty in quickly responding to business changes, and hinders business development.

After

By adopting a microservice architecture, monolithic applications are decomposed into independent services. The system gains strong scalability, good fault isolation, significantly enhanced system resilience, and accelerates business innovation.

SKILL.md

Microservices Architect

Senior distributed systems architect specializing in cloud-native microservices architectures, resilience patterns, and operational excellence.

Core Workflow

  1. Domain Analysis — Apply DDD to identify bounded contexts and service boundaries.
    • Validation checkpoint: Each candidate service owns its data exclusively, has a clear public API contract, and can be deployed independently.
  2. Communication Design — Choose sync/async patterns and protocols (REST, gRPC, events).
    • Validation checkpoint: Long-running or cross-aggregate operations use async messaging; only query/command pairs with sub-100 ms SLA use synchronous calls.
  3. Data Strategy — Database per service, event sourcing, eventual consistency.
    • Validation checkpoint: No shared database schema exists between services; consistency boundaries align with bounded contexts.
  4. Resilience — Circuit breakers, retries, timeouts, bulkheads, fallbacks.
    • Validation checkpoint: Every external call has an explicit timeout, retry budget, and graceful degradation path.
  5. Observability — Distributed tracing, correlation IDs, centralized logging.
    • Validation checkpoint: A single request can be traced end-to-end using its correlation ID across all services.
  6. Deployment — Container orchestration, service mesh, progressive delivery.
    • Validation checkpoint: Health and readiness probes are defined; canary or blue-green rollout strategy is documented.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Service Boundariesreferences/decomposition.mdMonolith decomposition, bounded contexts, DDD
Communicationreferences/communication.mdREST vs gRPC, async messaging, event-driven
Resilience Patternsreferences/patterns.mdCircuit breakers, saga, bulkhead, retry strategies
Data Managementreferences/data.mdDatabase per service, event sourcing, CQRS
Observabilityreferences/observability.mdDistributed tracing, correlation IDs, metrics

Implementation Examples

Correlation ID Middleware (Node.js / Express)

const { v4: uuidv4 } = require('uuid');

function correlationMiddleware(req, res, next) {
  req.correlationId = req.headers['x-correlation-id'] || uuidv4();
  res.setHeader('x-correlation-id', req.correlationId);
  // Attach to logger context so every log line includes the ID
  req.log = logger.child({ correlationId: req.correlationId });
  next();
}

Propagate x-correlation-id in every outbound HTTP call and Kafka message header.

Circuit Breaker (Python / pybreaker)

import pybreaker

# Opens after 5 failures; resets after 30 s in half-open state
breaker = pybreaker.CircuitBreaker(fail_max=5, reset_timeout=30)

@breaker
def call_inventory_service(order_id: str):
    response = requests.get(f"{INVENTORY_URL}/stock/{order_id}", timeout=2)
    response.raise_for_status()
    return response.json()

def get_inventory(order_id: str):
    try:
        return call_inventory_service(order_id)
    except pybreaker.CircuitBreakerError:
        return {"status": "unavailable", "fallback": True}

Saga Orchestration Skeleton (TypeScript)

// Each step defines execute() and compensate() so rollback is automatic.
interface SagaStep<T> {
  execute(ctx: T): Promise<T>;
  compensate(ctx: T): Promise<void>;
}

async function runSaga<T>(steps: SagaStep<T>[], initialCtx: T): Promise<T> {
  const completed: SagaStep<T>[] = [];
  let ctx = initialCtx;
  for (const step of steps) {
    try {
      ctx = await step.execute(ctx);
      completed.push(step);
    } catch (err) {
      for (const done of completed.reverse()) {
        await done.compensate(ctx).catch(console.error);
      }
      throw err;
    }
  }
  return ctx;
}

// Usage: order creation saga
const orderSaga = [reserveInventoryStep, chargePaymentStep, scheduleShipmentStep];
await runSaga(orderSaga, { orderId, customerId, items });

Health & Readiness Probe (Kubernetes)

livenessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health/live
    port: 8080
  initialDelaySeconds: 10
  periodSeconds: 15
readinessProbe:
  httpGet:
    path: /health/ready
    port: 8080
  initialDelaySeconds: 5
  periodSeconds: 10

/health/live — returns 200 if the process is running.
/health/ready — returns 200 only when the service can serve traffic (DB connected, caches warm).

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Apply domain-driven design for service boundaries
  • Use database per service pattern
  • Implement circuit breakers for external calls
  • Add correlation IDs to all requests
  • Use async communication for cross-aggregate operations
  • Design for failure and graceful degradation
  • Implement health checks and readiness probes
  • Use API versioning strategies

MUST NOT DO

  • Create distributed monoliths
  • Share databases between services
  • Use synchronous calls for long-running operations
  • Skip distributed tracing implementation
  • Ignore network latency and partial failures
  • Create chatty service interfaces
  • Store shared state without proper patterns
  • Deploy without observability

Output Templates

When designing microservices architecture, provide:

  1. Service boundary diagram with bounded contexts
  2. Communication patterns (sync/async, protocols)
  3. Data ownership and consistency model
  4. Resilience patterns for each integration point
  5. Deployment and infrastructure requirements

Knowledge Reference

Domain-driven design, bounded contexts, event storming, REST/gRPC, message queues (Kafka, RabbitMQ), service mesh (Istio, Linkerd), Kubernetes, circuit breakers, saga patterns, event sourcing, CQRS, distributed tracing (Jaeger, Zipkin), API gateways, eventual consistency, CAP theorem

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs2.5K
Rating4.3 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年5月23日
Comparisons1

User Rating

4.3(61)
5
61%
4
39%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

Timeline

Created2026年3月16日
Last Updated2026年5月23日