Home/Data & AI/karpathy-guidelines
K

karpathy-guidelines

by @forrestchangv
4.5(76)

Follow behavioral guidelines to effectively reduce common errors in LLM coding and improve code quality.

andrej-karpathyllm-trainingneural-networksai-best-practicesdeep-learningGitHub
Installation
npx skills add forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills --skill karpathy-guidelines
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

1
Before

When writing LLM code, common errors are often introduced due to a lack of standards, leading to poor model performance or abnormal behavior. Debugging becomes difficult, affecting development efficiency and model quality.

After

Following Karpathy's LLM coding guidelines can effectively reduce common errors. This enables the writing of more robust and predictable LLM code, improving model development efficiency and ultimate performance.

SKILL.md

Karpathy Guidelines

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.

Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.

1. Think Before Coding

Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.

Before implementing:

  • State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
  • If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
  • If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
  • If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.

2. Simplicity First

Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.

  • No features beyond what was asked.
  • No abstractions for single-use code.
  • No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
  • No error handling for impossible scenarios.
  • If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.

Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.

3. Surgical Changes

Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.

When editing existing code:

  • Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
  • Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
  • Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
  • If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.

When your changes create orphans:

  • Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
  • Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.

The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.

4. Goal-Driven Execution

Define success criteria. Loop until verified.

Transform tasks into verifiable goals:

  • "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
  • "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
  • "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"

For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:

1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]

Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs12.3K
Rating4.5 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年5月23日
Comparisons1

User Rating

4.5(76)
5
24%
4
50%
3
24%
2
3%
1
0%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

Timeline

Created2026年3月16日
Last Updated2026年5月23日