G

gstack

by @garrytanv
4.5(200)

Garry Tan's (Y Combinator CEO) Claude Code toolkit — 23 opinionated slash commands acting as CEO, Designer, Eng Manager, QA, Release Engineer, etc. — turning Claude Code into a virtual engineering team so one person can ship like twenty.

google-cloudcloud-infrastructurestack-managementdevops-utilitiesGitHub
Installation
npx skills add garrytan/gstack --skill gstack
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

2
Before

A solo developer codes and tests independently, often missing critical flaws, edge cases, or potential deployment issues due to the lack of specialized review from design, QA, or release engineers. This results in inconsistent code quality, high post-release bug fix costs, and unexpected issues after product launch.

After

With gstack's `/qa`, `/design`, and `/release` role commands, the developer receives immediate, expert feedback from simulated team members. This allows design flaws, potential bugs, and deployment risks to be identified and resolved early, significantly enhancing code robustness, maintainability, and release quality, drastically reducing post-launch problems and rework.

SKILL.md

gstack

"I don't think I've typed like a line of code probably since December, basically, which is an extremely large change." — Andrej Karpathy, No Priors podcast, March 2026

When I heard Karpathy say this, I wanted to find out how. How does one person ship like a team of twenty? Peter Steinberger built OpenClaw — 247K GitHub stars — essentially solo with AI agents. The revolution is here. A single builder with the right tooling can move faster than a traditional team.

I'm Garry Tan, President & CEO of Y Combinator. I've worked with thousands of startups — Coinbase, Instacart, Rippling — when they were one or two people in a garage. Before YC, I was one of the first eng/PM/designers at Palantir, cofounded Posterous (sold to Twitter), and built Bookface, YC's internal social network.

gstack is my answer. I've been building products for twenty years, and right now I'm shipping more products than I ever have. In the last 60 days: 3 production services, 40+ shipped features, part-time, while running YC full-time. On logical code change — not raw LOC, which AI inflates — my 2026 run rate is ~810× my 2013 pace (11,417 vs 14 logical lines/day). Year-to-date (through April 18), 2026 has already produced 240× the entire 2013 year. Measured across 40 public + private garrytan/* repos including Bookface, after excluding one demo repo. AI wrote most of it. The point isn't who typed it, it's what shipped.

The LOC critics aren't wrong that raw line counts inflate with AI. They are wrong that normalized-for-inflation, I'm less productive. I'm more productive, by a lot. Full methodology, caveats, and reproduction script: On the LOC Controversy.

2026 — 1,237 contributions and counting:

GitHub contributions 2026 — 1,237 contributions, massive acceleration in Jan-Mar

2013 — when I built Bookface at YC (772 contributions):

GitHub contributions 2013 — 772 contributions building Bookface at YC

Same person. Different era. The difference is the tooling.

gstack is how I do it. It turns Claude Code into a virtual engineering team — a CEO who rethinks the product, an eng manager who locks architecture, a designer who catches AI slop, a reviewer who finds production bugs, a QA lead who opens a real browser, a security officer who runs OWASP + STRIDE audits, and a release engineer who ships the PR. Twenty-three specialists and eight power tools, all slash commands, all Markdown, all free, MIT license.

This is my open source software factory. I use it every day. I'm sharing it because these tools should be available to everyone.

Fork it. Improve it. Make it yours. And if you want to hate on free open source software — you're welcome to, but I'd rather you just try it first.

Who this is for:

  • Founders and CEOs — especially technical ones who still want to ship
  • First-time Claude Code users — structured roles instead of a blank prompt
  • Tech leads and staff engineers — rigorous review, QA, and release automation on every PR

Quick start

  1. Install gstack (30 seconds — see below)
  2. Run /office-hours — describe what you're building
  3. Run /plan-ceo-review on any feature idea
  4. Run /review on any branch with changes
  5. Run /qa on your staging URL
  6. Stop there. You'll know if this is for you.

Install — 30 seconds

Requirements: Claude Code, Git, Bun v1.0+, Node.js (Windows only)

Step 1: Install on your machine

Open Claude Code and paste this. Claude does the rest.

Install gstack: run git clone --single-branch --depth 1 https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git ~/.claude/skills/gstack && cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && ./setup then add a "gstack" section to CLAUDE.md that says to use the /browse skill from gstack for all web browsing, never use mcp__claude-in-chrome__* tools, and lists the available skills: /office-hours, /plan-ceo-review, /plan-eng-review, /plan-design-review, /design-consultation, /design-shotgun, /design-html, /review, /ship, /land-and-deploy, /canary, /benchmark, /browse, /connect-chrome, /qa, /qa-only, /design-review, /setup-browser-cookies, /setup-deploy, /setup-gbrain, /retro, /investigate, /document-release, /document-generate, /codex, /cso, /autoplan, /plan-devex-review, /devex-review, /careful, /freeze, /guard, /unfreeze, /gstack-upgrade, /learn. Then ask the user if they also want to add gstack to the current project so teammates get it.

Step 2: Team mode — auto-update for shared repos (recommended)

From inside your repo, paste this. Switches you to team mode, bootstraps the repo so teammates get gstack automatically, and commits the change:

(cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && ./setup --team) && ~/.claude/skills/gstack/bin/gstack-team-init required && git add .claude/ CLAUDE.md && git commit -m "require gstack for AI-assisted work"

No vendored files in your repo, no version drift, no manual upgrades. Every Claude Code session starts with a fast auto-update check (throttled to once/hour, network-failure-safe, completely silent).

Swap required for optional if you'd rather nudge teammates than block them.

OpenClaw

OpenClaw spawns Claude Code sessions via ACP, so every gstack skill just works when Claude Code has gstack installed. Paste this to your OpenClaw agent:

Install gstack: run git clone --single-branch --depth 1 https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git ~/.claude/skills/gstack && cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && ./setup to install gstack for Claude Code. Then add a "Coding Tasks" section to AGENTS.md that says: when spawning Claude Code sessions for coding work, tell the session to use gstack skills. Include these examples — security audit: "Load gstack. Run /cso", code review: "Load gstack. Run /review", QA test a URL: "Load gstack. Run /qa https://...", build a feature end-to-end: "Load gstack. Run /autoplan, implement the plan, then run /ship", plan before building: "Load gstack. Run /office-hours then /autoplan. Save the plan, don't implement."

After setup, just talk to your OpenClaw agent naturally:

You sayWhat happens
"Fix the typo in README"Simple — Claude Code session, no gstack needed
"Run a security audit on this repo"Spawns Claude Code with Run /cso
"Build me a notifications feature"Spawns Claude Code with /autoplan → implement → /ship
"Help me plan the v2 API redesign"Spawns Claude Code with /office-hours → /autoplan, saves plan

See docs/OPENCLAW.md for advanced dispatch routing and the gstack-lite/gstack-full prompt templates.

Native OpenClaw Skills (via ClawHub)

Four methodology skills that work directly in your OpenClaw agent, no Claude Code session needed. Install from ClawHub:

clawhub install gstack-openclaw-office-hours gstack-openclaw-ceo-review gstack-openclaw-investigate gstack-openclaw-retro
SkillWhat it does
gstack-openclaw-office-hoursProduct interrogation with 6 forcing questions
gstack-openclaw-ceo-reviewStrategic challenge with 4 scope modes
gstack-openclaw-investigateRoot cause debugging methodology
gstack-openclaw-retroWeekly engineering retrospective

These are conversational skills. Your OpenClaw agent runs them directly via chat.

Other AI Agents

gstack works on 10 AI coding agents, not just Claude. Setup auto-detects which agents you have installed:

git clone --single-branch --depth 1 https://github.com/garrytan/gstack.git ~/gstack
cd ~/gstack && ./setup

Or target a specific agent with ./setup --host <name>:

AgentFlagSkills install to
OpenAI Codex CLI--host codex~/.codex/skills/gstack-*/
OpenCode--host opencode~/.config/opencode/skills/gstack-*/
Cursor--host cursor~/.cursor/skills/gstack-*/
Factory Droid--host factory~/.factory/skills/gstack-*/
Slate--host slate~/.slate/skills/gstack-*/
Kiro--host kiro~/.kiro/skills/gstack-*/
Hermes--host hermes~/.hermes/skills/gstack-*/
GBrain (mod)--host gbrain~/.gbrain/skills/gstack-*/

Want to add support for another agent? See docs/ADDING_A_HOST.md. It's one TypeScript config file, zero code changes.

See it work

You:    I want to build a daily briefing app for my calendar.
You:    /office-hours
Claude: [asks about the pain — specific examples, not hypotheticals]

You:    Multiple Google calendars, events with stale info, wrong locations.
        Prep takes forever and the results aren't good enough...

Claude: I'm going to push back on the framing. You said "daily briefing
        app." But what you actually described is a personal chief of
        staff AI.
        [extracts 5 capabilities you didn't realize you were describing]
        [challenges 4 premises — you agree, disagree, or adjust]
        [generates 3 implementation approaches with effort estimates]
        RECOMMENDATION: Ship the narrowest wedge tomorrow, learn from
        real usage. The full vision is a 3-month project — start with
        the daily briefing that actually works.
        [writes design doc → feeds into downstream skills automatically]

You:    /plan-ceo-review
        [reads the design doc, challenges scope, runs 10-section review]

You:    /plan-eng-review
        [ASCII diagrams for data flow, state machines, error paths]
        [test matrix, failure modes, security concerns]

You:    Approve plan. Exit plan mode.
        [writes 2,400 lines across 11 files. ~8 minutes.]

You:    /review
        [AUTO-FIXED] 2 issues. [ASK] Race condition → you approve fix.

You:    /qa https://staging.myapp.com
        [opens real browser, clicks through flows, finds and fixes a bug]

You:    /ship
        Tests: 42 → 51 (+9 new). PR: github.com/you/app/pull/42

You said "daily briefing app." The agent said "you're building a chief of staff AI" — because it listened to your pain, not your feature request. Eight commands, end to end. That is not a copilot. That is a team.

The sprint

gstack is a process, not a collection of tools. The skills run in the order a sprint runs:

Think → Plan → Build → Review → Test → Ship → Reflect

Each skill feeds into the next. /office-hours writes a design doc that /plan-ceo-review reads. /plan-eng-review writes a test plan that /qa picks up. /review catches bugs that /ship verifies are fixed. Nothing falls through the cracks because every step knows what came before it.

SkillYour specialistWhat they do
/office-hoursYC Office HoursStart here. Six forcing questions that reframe your product before you write code. Pushes back on your framing, challenges premises, generates implementation alternatives. Design doc feeds into every downstream skill.
/plan-ceo-reviewCEO / FounderRethink the problem. Find the 10-star product hiding inside the request. Four modes: Expansion, Selective Expansion, Hold Scope, Reduction.
/plan-eng-reviewEng ManagerLock in architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, and tests. Forces hidden assumptions into the open.
/plan-design-reviewSenior DesignerRates each design dimension 0-10, explains what a 10 looks like, then edits the plan to get there. AI Slop detection. Interactive — one AskUserQuestion per design choice.
/plan-devex-reviewDeveloper Experience LeadInteractive DX review: explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors' TTHW, designs your magical moment, traces friction points step by step. Three modes: DX EXPANSION, DX POLISH, DX TRIAGE. 20-45 forcing questions.
/design-consultationDesign PartnerBuild a complete design system from scratch. Researches the landscape, proposes creative risks, generates realistic product mockups.
/reviewStaff EngineerFind the bugs that pass CI but blow up in production. Auto-fixes the obvious ones. Flags completeness gaps.
/investigateDebuggerSystematic root-cause debugging. Iron Law: no fixes without investigation. Traces data flow, tests hypotheses, stops after 3 failed fixes.
/design-reviewDesigner Who CodesSame audit as /plan-design-review, then fixes what it finds. Atomic commits, before/after screenshots.
/devex-reviewDX TesterLive developer experience audit. Actually tests your onboarding: navigates docs, tries the getting started flow, times TTHW, screenshots errors. Compares against /plan-devex-review scores — the boomerang that shows if your plan matched reality.
/design-shotgunDesign Explorer"Show me options." Generates 4-6 AI mockup variants, opens a comparison board in your browser, collects your feedback, and iterates. Taste memory learns what you like. Repeat until you love something, then hand it to /design-html.
/design-htmlDesign EngineerTurn a mockup into production HTML that actually works. Pretext computed layout: text reflows, heights adjust, layouts are dynamic. 30KB, zero deps. Detects React/Svelte/Vue. Smart API routing per design type (landing page vs dashboard vs form). The output is shippable, not a demo.
/qaQA LeadTest your app, find bugs, fix them with atomic commits, re-verify. Auto-generates regression tests for every fix.
/qa-onlyQA ReporterSame methodology as /qa but report only. Pure bug report without code changes.
/pair-agentMulti-Agent CoordinatorShare your browser with any AI agent. One command, one paste, connected. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or anything that can curl. Each agent gets its own tab. Auto-launches headed mode so you watch everything. Auto-starts ngrok tunnel for remote agents. Scoped tokens, tab isolation, rate limiting, activity attribution.
/csoChief Security OfficerOWASP Top 10 + STRIDE threat model. Zero-noise: 17 false positive exclusions, 8/10+ confidence gate, independent finding verification. Each finding includes a concrete exploit scenario.
/shipRelease EngineerSync main, run tests, audit coverage, push, open PR. Bootstraps test frameworks if you don't have one.
/land-and-deployRelease EngineerMerge the PR, wait for CI and deploy, verify production health. One command from "approved" to "verified in production."

...

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs11.9K
Rating4.5 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年5月23日
Comparisons2

User Rating

4.5(200)
5
60%
4
40%
3
1%
2
0%
1
0%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🔧Claude Code

Timeline

Created2026年3月18日
Last Updated2026年5月23日