D

do-work

by @bladnmanv
4.1(20)

Unified task capture and processing entry point for logging new tasks/requests and creating corresponding files for tracking.

task-automationworkflow-managementproductivity-toolsproject-executionprocess-optimizationGitHub
Installation
npx skills add bladnman/do-work --skill do-work
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

1
Before

Tasks and requests enter sporadically through various channels, lacking a unified capture and management mechanism, leading to missed tasks, confused priorities, and difficulty in effectively planning and tracking work progress.

After

By capturing all tasks and requests through a unified entry point, automatically creating structured files, and proceeding with planning, exploration, building, and testing, each task is ensured to be properly handled and validated, improving work efficiency and transparency.

SKILL.md

do-work

Do-Work Skill

A unified entry point for task capture and processing.

Actions:

  • do: Capture new tasks/requests → creates UR folder (verbatim input) + REQ files (queue items), always paired, then verifies coverage

  • work: Process pending requests → plans (with plan verification), explores, builds, tests

  • verify: Evaluate captured REQs against original input → coverage check with auto-fix (also runs automatically after capture)

  • cleanup: Consolidate archive → moves loose REQs into UR folders, closes completed URs

Core concept: The do action always produces both a UR folder (preserving the original input) and REQ files (the queue items). Each REQ links back to its UR via user_request frontmatter. This pairing is mandatory for all requests — simple or complex.

Capture ≠ Execute. The do action captures requests. The work action executes them. These are strictly separate operations. After the do action finishes writing files and reporting back, STOP. Do not start processing the queue, do not begin implementation, do not "helpfully" transition into the work action. The user decides when to execute — always. The only exception is if the user explicitly says something like "add this and then run it" or "capture this and start working" in the same invocation.

Routing Decision

Step 1: Parse the Input

Examine what follows "do work":

Check these patterns in order — first match wins:

Priority Pattern Example Route

1 Empty or bare invocation do work → Ask: "Start the work loop?"

2 Action verbs only do work run, do work go, do work start → work

3 Verify keywords do work verify, do work check, do work evaluate → verify

4 Cleanup keywords do work cleanup, do work tidy, do work consolidate → cleanup

5 Version keywords do work version, do work update, do work check for updates → version

6 Changelog keywords do work changelog, do work release notes, do work what's new, do work what's changed, do work updates, do work history → version

7 Descriptive content do work add dark mode, do work [meeting notes] → do

Step 2: Preserve Payload

Critical rule: Never lose the user's content.

Single-word rule: A single word is either a known keyword or ambiguous — it is never "descriptive content."

  • Matches a keyword in the routing table (e.g., "version", "verify", "cleanup") → route to that action directly.

  • Doesn't match any keyword (e.g., "refactor", "optimize") → ambiguous. Ask: "Do you want to add '{word}' as a new request, or did you mean something else?"

Only route to do when the input is clearly descriptive — multiple words, a sentence, a feature request, etc.

If routing is genuinely unclear AND multi-word content was provided:

  • Default to do (adding a task)

  • Hold onto $ARGUMENTS

  • If truly ambiguous, ask: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"

  • User replies with just "add" or "work" → proceed with original content

Action Verbs (→ Work)

These signal "process the queue": run, go, start, begin, work, process, execute, build, continue, resume

Verify Verbs (→ Verify)

These signal "check request quality": verify, check, evaluate, review requests, review reqs, audit

Note: "check" routes to verify ONLY when used alone or with a target (e.g., "do work check UR-003"). When followed by descriptive content it routes to do (e.g., "do work check if the button works" → do).

Cleanup Verbs (→ Cleanup)

These signal "consolidate the archive": cleanup, clean up, tidy, consolidate, organize archive, fix archive

Changelog Verbs (→ Version)

These signal "show release notes": changelog, release notes, what's new, what's changed, updates, history

Note: "updates" (plural) routes to changelog display. "update" (singular) routes to update check. Both are handled by the version action.

Content Signals (→ Do)

These signal "add a new task":

  • Descriptive text beyond a single verb

  • Feature requests, bug reports, ideas

  • Screenshots or context

  • "add", "create", "I need", "we should"

Examples

Routes to Work

  • do work → "Ready to process the queue?" (confirmation)

  • do work run → Starts work action immediately

  • do work go → Starts work action immediately

Routes to Verify

  • do work verify → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs

  • do work verify UR-003 → Evaluates specific UR

  • do work check REQ-018 → Evaluates the UR that REQ-018 belongs to

  • do work evaluate → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs

  • do work review requests → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs

Routes to Cleanup

  • do work cleanup → Consolidates archive, closes completed URs

  • do work tidy → Same as cleanup

  • do work consolidate → Same as cleanup

Routes to Changelog (via Version)

  • do work changelog → Displays changelog (newest at bottom)

  • do work release notes → Same as changelog

  • do work what's new → Same as changelog

  • do work updates → Same as changelog

  • do work history → Same as changelog

Routes to Do

  • do work add dark mode → Creates REQ file + UR folder

  • do work the button is broken → Creates REQ file + UR folder

  • do work [400 words] → Creates REQ files + UR folder with full verbatim input

Payload Preservation Rules

When clarification is needed but content was provided:

  • Do not lose $ARGUMENTS - keep the full payload in context

  • Ask a simple question: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"

  • Accept minimal replies: User says just "add" or "work"

  • Proceed with original content: Apply the chosen action to the stored arguments

  • Never ask the user to re-paste content

This enables a two-phase commit pattern:

  • Capture intent payload

  • Confirm action

Action References

Follow the detailed instructions in:

Weekly Installs245Repositorybladnman/do-workGitHub Stars89First SeenJan 27, 2026Security AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykFailInstalled onclaude-code214opencode179codex170gemini-cli166github-copilot131kimi-cli103

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs293
Rating4.1 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年5月23日
Comparisons1

User Rating

4.1(20)
5
30%
4
55%
3
15%
2
0%
1
0%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

Timeline

Created2026年3月17日
Last Updated2026年5月23日