Home/Testing & QA/firecrawl-qa
F

firecrawl-qa

by @firecrawlv
4.6(120)

This skill uses the Firecrawl browser to conduct comprehensive quality assurance testing on live websites, covering exploratory QA, form testing, navigation checks, responsive design, and performance observations. It automatically generates detailed QA reports, including identified issues, reproduction steps, and evidence, significantly improving testing efficiency and report quality.

quality-assuranceweb-testingtest-automationbug-reportingwebsite-auditGitHub
Installation
npx skills add https://github.com/firecrawl/firecrawl-workflows --skill firecrawl-qa
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

1 组
Before

Manually conducting comprehensive website QA testing requires significant time for page browsing, functional verification, and issue logging, leading to slow and error-prone report generation.

After

Automated Firecrawl QA skill quickly scans websites, automatically identifies issues, and generates structured reports, drastically reducing testing cycles and report preparation time.

SKILL.md

Firecrawl QA

Use this to test a live site and return a unified QA report.

Onboarding Interview

Infer the URL, QA focus, and output format from context. If the target URL is clear, proceed immediately.

Ask at most 1-3 concise questions only if blocked, such as the URL, the focus area, or credentials/constraints for protected flows.

Firecrawl Collection Plan

Use Firecrawl map to discover pages. Use Firecrawl browser for interactions, forms, navigation, and responsive/manual checks when available. Use scrape for page content and link extraction.

Parallel Work

If appropriate, use sub-agents or equivalent parallel task runners:

  • Full: Navigation and Links, Forms and Interactions, Content and Visual, Error States.
  • Forms: Form Discovery, Happy Path, Edge Cases, Validation.
  • Navigation: Sitemap, Nav Testing, Link Checker, Routing.
  • Responsive: Desktop, Tablet, Mobile, Interaction.
  • Performance: Page Load, Asset Audit, Content Efficiency, Comparison.

Each tester should return severity, URL, description, evidence, and reproduction steps.

Final Deliverable

# QA Report: [Site]

## Summary
- Health score: [x/10]
- Pages tested: [count]
- Issues found: [critical/major/minor]

## Critical Issues
[C-1] URL | Description | Steps to reproduce | Expected vs actual

## Major Issues
[M-1] URL | Description | Steps to reproduce

## Minor Issues
[m-1] URL | Description

## Positive Observations
[What works well]

## Pages Tested
[URLs]

## Agent/Test Summary
[Who tested what]

## Rerun Inputs
workflow: firecrawl-qa
url: [url]
focus: [full/forms/navigation/responsive/performance]

Quality Bar

  • Include reproduction steps for functional issues.
  • Do not report speculative bugs without evidence.
  • Deduplicate findings across testers.

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs31.3K
Rating4.6 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年10月21日
Comparisons1

User Rating

4.6(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🤖claude-code

Timeline

Created2026年5月22日
Last Updated2026年10月21日
🎁 Agent Knowledge Cards
Survey