D

domain-modeling

by @mattpocockv
4.9(120)

This skill helps developers actively build and refine a project's domain model, clarify core business terminology and ubiquitous language, and promptly record significant architectural decisions. By challenging vague concepts, discussing concrete scenarios, and cross-referencing with code, it effectively reduces team communication barriers, deepens business understanding, ensures software design aligns closely with business requirements, and ultimately improves development efficiency and project quality.

domain-modelingsoftware-architectureubiquitous-languagearchitectural-decisionsglossaryGitHub
Installation
npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill domain-modeling
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

1 组
Before

Before this skill, developers often faced communication breakdowns and rework due to inconsistent domain terminology, vague concepts, and undocumented architectural decisions during project initiation or iteration, severely impacting development efficiency and project quality.

After

This skill actively builds and refines the domain model, clarifies ubiquitous language, and promptly records architectural decisions, significantly reducing communication overhead and rework, thereby enhancing the team's understanding of the business and development efficiency.

SKILL.md

Domain Modeling

Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline — challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading CONTEXT.md for vocabulary is not this skill — that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/
│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/

If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:

/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│   ├── ordering/
│   │   ├── CONTEXT.md
│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions
│   └── billing/
│       ├── CONTEXT.md
│       └── docs/adr/

Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"

Update CONTEXT.md inline

When a term is resolved, update CONTEXT.md right there. Don't batch these up — capture them as they happen. Use the format in CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.

CONTEXT.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat CONTEXT.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

  1. Hard to reverse — the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
  2. Surprising without context — a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
  3. The result of a real trade-off — there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs868.7K
Rating4.9 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年10月23日
Comparisons1

User Rating

4.9(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🤖claude-code

Timeline

Created2026年6月19日
Last Updated2026年10月23日
🎁 Agent Knowledge Cards
Survey