diff-intake
This skill is the first step of an analytics instrumentation workflow. It automatically gathers changed files, categorizes them, and produces a compact YAML change brief for downstream event discovery and instrumentation. It helps developers quickly identify user-facing changes and relevant surfaces, assess analytics scope, and drastically reduce time spent manually reviewing PRs or branch diffs, enabling product analytics teams to make faster instrumentation decisions.
npx skills add https://github.com/amplitude/mcp-marketplace --skill diff-intakeBefore / After Comparison
1 组When manually reviewing a PR or branch diff, developers need to read each diff, categorize files, and infer instrumentation impact. A medium-sized PR often takes over 30 minutes and is prone to missing key changes.
This skill automatically categorizes files and generates a change summary, producing a structured YAML brief in minutes. It quickly highlights user-facing changes and analytics scope, reducing human error.
diff-intake
Follow this skill step by step. You are step 1 of the analytics instrumentation workflow. Produce a compact YAML change brief that downstream skills (discover-event-surfaces, instrument-events) will consume. Keep the output machine-readable and precise — no prose around the YAML block.
Step 1: Gather changed files and categorize
Fetch the list of changed files from the source, then categorize each one.
Fetching changes
- PR URL
gh pr view <number-or-url>gh pr view <pr-number> --json files --jq '.files[] | "\(.path)\t+\(.additions) -\(.deletions)\t"' - Branch comparison
git log <main|master>..<branch>git diff --stat <main|master>..<branch> - Ambiguous mention (PR number, branch name): infer the right form and fetch without asking unless auth fails.
Categorize files
Assign each file to a category based on its path:
- Core Logic: application source (e.g. src/auth/login.py, database/models.ts)
- Generated: anything with
generatedin its path - Testing: test files
- Config / Dependencies: package.json, docker-compose.yml, etc.
- Documentation: READMEs, docs/
- Noise: lock-files, .svg, auto-generated migrations
For each file, record: path, category, change type (Added / Modified / Deleted), and analytics likelihood (1–5).
Step 2: Build the file summary map
Read every single Core Logic file and create the file summary map. Only process and include Core Logic files.
Fetching detailed diffs
- PR
gh pr view <number-or-url> --json baseRefOid,headRefOidUsing the response, get a detailed diffgit diff <baseRefOid>...<headRefOid> -- <file1> <file2> <file_n> - Branch comparison
git diff main..feature/foo -- <file1> <file2> <file_n>
For each file, record
summary— 2-line summary of what changedstack— frontend, backend, or shared
Also derive user-facing changes and touched surfaces
While reading the diff and the changed files, also produce the higher-level signals that downstream event discovery needs:
user_facing_changes— a flat list of concrete behavior changes that matter to a user, PM, or analyst. Each item should describe what a user can now do, see, or experience differently. Omit purely internal refactors.surfaces.components— the UI components, routes, pages, handlers, or other interaction surfaces directly involved in those user-facing changes. Prefer likely instrumentation points over low-level helpers.
For each surface, record:
name— component, route, page, hook, or surface namefile— repo-relative pathchange—added,modified, ordeleted
If the change is backend-only or has no clear interactive surface, omit
surfaces.components rather than inventing one.
Step 3: Classify the overall change
Infer the change type and analytics scope:
| Type | Analytics implication |
|---|---|
| feat | High — new surfaces likely need tracking |
| fix | Low–Medium — may affect existing event conditions |
| refactor | Low — tracking paths may move, regression risk |
| perf | Low — usually no tracking impact |
| revert | Medium — need to check what tracking was lost |
| style / docs / test / build / ci / chore | None — skip analytics analysis |
analytics_scope = highest implication present:
none— only no-impact typeslow— only perf/refactormedium— fixhigh— any feature or capability addition
If analytics_scope is none, emit the brief and note that downstream skills are not needed.
Step 4: Emit the YAML brief
Output only the YAML block — no prose before or after. Follow the format exactly. List each file individually in file_summary_map (no globs).
change_brief:
classification:
primary: feat # dominant conventional commit type
types: [feat, fix] # all types detected
analytics_scope: high # none | low | medium | high
stack: frontend # frontend | backend | fullstack
summary: "One sentence describing the overall change"
user_facing_changes:
- "Users can now upload an avatar with drag-and-drop and preview it before saving."
surfaces:
components:
- name: "AvatarUpload"
file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
change: modified
file_summary_map: # each entry includes a layer field
- file: "src/components/AvatarUpload.tsx"
summary: "New component for avatar upload with drag-and-drop and preview"
layer: frontend # frontend | backend | shared
- file: "src/api/upload.ts"
summary: "Upload endpoint handler, validates file type and persists to S3"
layer: backend
User Reviews (0)
Write a Review
No reviews yet
Statistics
User Rating
Rate this Skill