bmad-correct-course
bmad-correct-course assesses how a significant change made mid-sprint ripples across the PRD, epics, architecture, and UX documents, then produces a structured Sprint Change Proposal. When scope shifts or a blocking issue appears during execution, this Skill loads every planning artifact, maps the impact on each one, and hands off clear, actionable edits so teams avoid missed dependencies, rework, and drifting documentation.
npx skills add https://github.com/bmad-code-org/bmad-method --skill bmad-correct-courseBefore / After Comparison
1 组When a major requirement change lands halfway through a sprint, developers manually dig through the PRD, epics, and architecture docs to guess which sections must change. Related content gets missed, the team holds repeated meetings to confirm scope, and every edit relies on verbal alignment, making rework likely.
This Skill loads all planning artifacts at once, lists the affected sections with suggested edits, and produces a structured Sprint Change Proposal. Developers implement directly from the proposal with clear scope and handoff, sharply reducing missed items and rework.
Correct Course - Sprint Change Management Workflow
Goal: Manage significant changes during sprint execution by analyzing impact across all project artifacts and producing a structured Sprint Change Proposal.
Your Role: You are a Developer navigating change management. Analyze the triggering issue, assess impact across PRD, epics, architecture, and UX artifacts, and produce an actionable Sprint Change Proposal with clear handoff.
Conventions
- Bare paths (e.g.
checklist.md) resolve from the skill root. {skill-root}resolves to this skill's installed directory (wherecustomize.tomllives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name}resolves to the skill directory's basename.
On Activation
Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow
If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
{skill-root}/customize.toml— defaults{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml— team overrides{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml— personal overrides
Any missing file is skipped. Scalars override, tables deep-merge, arrays of tables keyed by code or id replace matching entries and append new entries, and all other arrays append.
Step 2: Execute Prepend Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_prepend} in order before proceeding.
Step 3: Load Persistent Facts
Treat every entry in {workflow.persistent_facts} as foundational context you carry for the rest of the workflow run. Entries prefixed file: are paths or globs under {project-root} — load the referenced contents as facts. All other entries are facts verbatim.
Step 4: Load Config
Run: uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_config.py --project-root {project-root} --key core.project_name --key modules.bmm.implementation_artifacts --key modules.bmm.planning_artifacts --key modules.bmm.project_knowledge
dateas system-generated current datetime- YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style
- DOCUMENT OUTPUT: Updated epics, stories, or PRD sections. Clear, actionable changes.
Step 5: Greet the User
Greet the user.
Step 6: Execute Append Steps
Execute each entry in {workflow.activation_steps_append} in order.
Activation is complete. If activation_steps_prepend or activation_steps_append were non-empty, confirm every entry was executed in order before proceeding. Do not begin the main workflow until all activation steps have been completed.
Paths
default_output_file={planning_artifacts}/sprint-change-proposal-{date}.md
Input Files
| Input | Path | Load Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| PRD | {planning_artifacts}/*prd*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*prd*/*.md (sharded) | FULL_LOAD |
| Epics | {planning_artifacts}/*epic*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*epic*/*.md (sharded) | FULL_LOAD |
| Architecture | {planning_artifacts}/*architecture*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*architecture*/*.md (sharded) | FULL_LOAD |
| UX Design | {planning_artifacts}/*ux*.md (whole) or {planning_artifacts}/*ux*/*.md (sharded) | FULL_LOAD |
| Spec | {planning_artifacts}/*spec-*.md (whole) | FULL_LOAD |
| Project Context | AGENTS.md in the affected repo (the bmad:context block) | FULL_LOAD |
Execution
Document Discovery - Loading Project Artifacts
Strategy: Course correction needs broad project context to assess change impact accurately. Load all available planning artifacts.
Discovery Process for FULL_LOAD documents (PRD, Epics, Architecture, UX Design, Spec):
- Search for whole document first - Look for files matching the whole-document pattern (e.g.,
*prd*.md,*epic*.md,*architecture*.md,*ux*.md,*spec-*.md) - Check for sharded version - If whole document not found, look for a directory with
index.md(e.g.,prd/index.md,epics/index.md) - If sharded version found:
- Read
index.mdto understand the document structure - Read ALL section files listed in the index
- Process the combined content as a single document
- Read
- Priority: If both whole and sharded versions exist, use the whole document
Discovery Process for Project Context:
- Read
AGENTS.mdin the repo the change affects — the block between thebmad:contextmarkers carries the policy, frozen paths, and conventions a course correction must respect. - Follow only the pointers that relate to the impacted areas — nested component files or linked rule files listed under "Where things are". Do not load them all.
- This document is optional — skip if the repo has no
AGENTS.md(greenfield projects).
Fuzzy matching: Be flexible with document names — users may use variations like prd.md, bmm-prd.md, product-requirements.md, etc.
Missing documents: Not all documents may exist. PRD and Epics are essential; Architecture, UX Design, Spec, and Document Project are loaded if available. HALT if PRD or Epics cannot be found.
HALT: "Cannot navigate change without clear understanding of the triggering issue. Please provide specific details about what needs to change and why."
HALT: "Need access to PRD and Epics to assess change impact. Please ensure these documents are accessible. Architecture and UI/UX will be used if available."
Identify blocking issues and work with user to resolve before continuing
For Story changes:
-
Show old → new text format
-
Include story ID and section being modified
-
Provide rationale for each change
-
Example format:
Story: [STORY-123] User Authentication Section: Acceptance Criteria OLD: - User can log in with email/password NEW: - User can log in with email/password - User can enable 2FA via authenticator app Rationale: Security requirement identified during implementation
For PRD modifications:
- Specify exact sections to update
- Show current content and proposed changes
- Explain impact on MVP scope and requirements
For Architecture changes:
- Identify affected components, patterns, or technology choices
- Describe diagram updates needed
- Note any ripple effects on other components
For UI/UX specification updates:
- Reference specific screens or components
- Show wireframe or flow changes needed
- Connect changes to user experience impact
Collect all edit proposals and present together at end of step
Section 1: Issue Summary
- Clear problem statement describing what triggered the change
- Context about when/how the issue was discovered
- Evidence or examples demonstrating the issue
Section 2: Impact Analysis
- Epic Impact: Which epics are affected and how
- Story Impact: Current and future stories requiring changes
- Artifact Conflicts: PRD, Architecture, UI/UX documents needing updates
- Technical Impact: Code, infrastructure, or deployment implications
Section 3: Recommended Approach
- Present chosen path forward from checklist evaluation:
- Direct Adjustment: Modify/add stories within existing plan
- Potential Rollback: Revert completed work to simplify resolution
- MVP Review: Reduce scope or modify goals
- Provide clear rationale for recommendation
- Include effort estimate, risk assessment, and timeline impact
Section 4: Detailed Change Proposals
- Include all refined edit proposals from Step 3
- Group by artifact type (Stories, PRD, Architecture, UI/UX)
- Ensure each change includes before/after and justification
Section 5: Implementation Handoff
- Categorize change scope:
- Minor: Direct implementation by Developer agent
- Moderate: Backlog reorganization needed (PO/DEV)
- Major: Fundamental replan required (PM/Architect)
- Specify handoff recipients and their responsibilities
- Define success criteria for implementation
Present complete Sprint Change Proposal to user Write Sprint Change Proposal document to {default_output_file} HALT and give the user a choice:
- Continue — proceed to approval
- Edit — revise the proposal first
If the user chooses Edit, revise the proposal with them and write the updated document before continuing.
- Minor: Can be implemented directly by Developer agent
- Moderate: Requires backlog reorganization and PO/DEV coordination
- Major: Needs fundamental replan with PM/Architect involvement
Provide appropriate handoff based on scope:
Confirm handoff completion and next steps with user Document handoff in workflow execution log
Confirm all deliverables produced:
- Sprint Change Proposal document
- Specific edit proposals with before/after
- Implementation handoff plan
Report workflow completion to user: "Correct Course workflow complete!"
Remind user of success criteria and next steps for Developer agent
Run: uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow.on_complete — if the resolved value is non-empty, follow it as the final terminal instruction before exiting.
User Reviews (0)
Write a Review
No reviews yet
Statistics
User Rating
Rate this Skill