B

backprop

by @juliusbrusseev
4.4(120)

"backprop" is a structured bug-fixing process that ensures code quality and prevents recurrence by tracing, analyzing, updating specifications, and generating tests. It transforms each bug fix into an improvement of the system's specification, enhancing long-term software stability.

bug-fixingspec-managementquality-assurancesoftware-engineeringtest-generationGitHub
Installation
npx skills add https://github.com/juliusbrussee/cavekit --skill backprop
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

1 组
Before

Without a structured process, bug fixes are often ad-hoc, leading to the recurrence of similar issues and significant waste of development resources.

After

With the backprop process, every bug fix is accompanied by spec updates and test generation, fundamentally eliminating recurring bugs and significantly improving code quality and development efficiency.

SKILL.md

backprop — bug → spec

Plan-then-execute fixes the code & forgets. SDD fixes the code AND edits spec so recurrence is impossible. That edit is backprop.

WHEN TO BACKPROP

  • Test failed at /build verification.
  • User reports bug.
  • Post-mortem after production incident.
  • /check flags VIOLATE with root cause found.

SIX STEPS

1. TRACE

Read failure output / bug report. Find exact file:line of wrong behavior. Name root cause in one caveman sentence.

2. ANALYZE

Ask three questions:

  • Would a new §V invariant catch this class of bug? (most common: yes)
  • Is §I wrong — did spec claim shape the code cannot deliver? (sometimes)
  • Is §T wrong — did we build the wrong thing? (rare but real)

3. PROPOSE

Draft the spec change. Never skip §B; §V/§I/§T are case-by-case.

Template:

§B row: B<next>|<date>|<root cause>|V<N>
§V line: V<next>: <testable rule that would have caught it>

Example:

§B row: B3|2026-04-20|refund job ran twice on retry|V7
§V line: V7: ∀ refund → idempotency key check before charge reversal

4. GENERATE TEST

New invariant without test = lie. Add failing test first. Name test so it cites the invariant: TestV7_RefundIdempotent.

5. VERIFY

Fix code. Run test. Must pass. Run full suite. Must not regress.

6. LOG

Commit spec edit + test + code fix together. Commit msg: backprop §B.<n> + §V.<N>: <one-line cause>.

WHAT MAKES A GOOD INVARIANT

  • Testable in code (grep-able or assert-able).
  • Scoped to a behavior, not a file.
  • Stated positively when possible (! hold over ⊥ forbid).
  • References §I surface where it applies.

Bad: V8: code should be correct. Good: V8: ∀ pg_query ! params interpolated via driver, ⊥ string concat.

WHEN NOT TO ADD §V

  • Bug was purely mechanical typo with no class (i++ vs i-- in throwaway).
  • Fix is a one-time migration.
  • Root cause is external dep (upgrade deps instead, note in §C).

Still append §B entry — record that this failure mode was considered. Future bug with same smell → §B search shows precedent.

OUTPUT SHAPE

Every backprop run produces:

  1. §B entry (always).
  2. §V entry (usually).
  3. Test file (when §V added).
  4. Code fix.
  5. One commit.

No dashboards. No log files. SPEC.md + git is the full history.

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs2.6K
Rating4.4 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年8月27日
Comparisons1

User Rating

4.4(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🤖claude-code

Timeline

Created2026年5月19日
Last Updated2026年8月27日
🎁 Agent Knowledge Cards
Survey