golang-stretchr-testify
Write readable Go test cases based on the testify framework, improving test code maintainability using assertions and mocks.
npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-stretchr-testifyBefore / After Comparison
1 组Writing tests using the standard `testing` package, with a large amount of `if/assert.NoError(err)` boilerplate code, test logic is drowned out by noise, and new hires need 30 minutes to understand the intent of a test case.
Using testify's assertion chains and mock features, test code is concise and clear, the intent is obvious at a glance, adding new test cases takes only 5 minutes, and error messages on test failure are more user-friendly.
golang-stretchr-testify
Persona: You are a Go engineer who treats tests as executable specifications. You write tests to constrain behavior and make failures self-explanatory — not to hit coverage targets.
Modes:
-
Write mode — adding new tests or mocks to a codebase.
-
Review mode — auditing existing test code for testify misuse.
stretchr/testify
testify complements Go's testing package with readable assertions, mocks, and suites. It does not replace testing — always use *testing.T as the entry point.
This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.
assert vs require
Both offer identical assertions. The difference is failure behavior:
-
assert: records failure, continues — see all failures at once
-
require: calls
t.FailNow()— use for preconditions where continuing would panic or mislead
Use assert.New(t) / require.New(t) for readability. Name them is and must:
func TestParseConfig(t *testing.T) {
is := assert.New(t)
must := require.New(t)
cfg, err := ParseConfig("testdata/valid.yaml")
must.NoError(err) // stop if parsing fails — cfg would be nil
must.NotNil(cfg)
is.Equal("production", cfg.Environment)
is.Equal(8080, cfg.Port)
is.True(cfg.TLS.Enabled)
}
Rule: require for preconditions (setup, error checks), assert for verifications. Never mix randomly.
Core Assertions
is := assert.New(t)
// Equality
is.Equal(expected, actual) // DeepEqual + exact type
is.NotEqual(unexpected, actual)
is.EqualValues(expected, actual) // converts to common type first
is.EqualExportedValues(expected, actual)
// Nil / Bool / Emptiness
is.Nil(obj) is.NotNil(obj)
is.True(cond) is.False(cond)
is.Empty(collection) is.NotEmpty(collection)
is.Len(collection, n)
// Contains (strings, slices, map keys)
is.Contains("hello world", "world")
is.Contains([]int{1, 2, 3}, 2)
is.Contains(map[string]int{"a": 1}, "a")
// Comparison
is.Greater(actual, threshold) is.Less(actual, ceiling)
is.Positive(val) is.Negative(val)
is.Zero(val)
// Errors
is.Error(err) is.NoError(err)
is.ErrorIs(err, ErrNotFound) // walks error chain
is.ErrorAs(err, &target)
is.ErrorContains(err, "not found")
// Type
is.IsType(&User{}, obj)
is.Implements((*io.Reader)(nil), obj)
Argument order: always (expected, actual) — swapping produces confusing diff output.
Advanced Assertions
is.ElementsMatch([]string{"b", "a", "c"}, result) // unordered comparison
is.InDelta(3.14, computedPi, 0.01) // float tolerance
is.JSONEq(`{"name":"alice"}`, `{"name": "alice"}`) // ignores whitespace/key order
is.WithinDuration(expected, actual, 5*time.Second)
is.Regexp(`^user-[a-f0-9]+$`, userID)
// Async polling
is.Eventually(func() bool {
status, _ := client.GetJobStatus(jobID)
return status == "completed"
}, 5*time.Second, 100*time.Millisecond)
// Async polling with rich assertions
is.EventuallyWithT(func(c *assert.CollectT) {
resp, err := client.GetOrder(orderID)
assert.NoError(c, err)
assert.Equal(c, "shipped", resp.Status)
}, 10*time.Second, 500*time.Millisecond)
testify/mock
Mock interfaces to isolate the unit under test. Embed mock.Mock, implement methods with m.Called(), always verify with AssertExpectations(t).
Key matchers: mock.Anything, mock.AnythingOfType("T"), mock.MatchedBy(func). Call modifiers: .Once(), .Times(n), .Maybe(), .Run(func).
For defining mocks, argument matchers, call modifiers, return sequences, and verification, see Mock reference.
testify/suite
Suites group related tests with shared setup/teardown.
Lifecycle
SetupSuite() → once before all tests
SetupTest() → before each test
TestXxx()
TearDownTest() → after each test
TearDownSuite() → once after all tests
Example
type TokenServiceSuite struct {
suite.Suite
store *MockTokenStore
service *TokenService
}
func (s *TokenServiceSuite) SetupTest() {
s.store = new(MockTokenStore)
s.service = NewTokenService(s.store)
}
func (s *TokenServiceSuite) TestGenerate_ReturnsValidToken() {
s.store.On("Save", mock.Anything, mock.Anything).Return(nil)
token, err := s.service.Generate("user-42")
s.NoError(err)
s.NotEmpty(token)
s.store.AssertExpectations(s.T())
}
// Required launcher
func TestTokenServiceSuite(t *testing.T) {
suite.Run(t, new(TokenServiceSuite))
}
Suite methods like s.Equal() behave like assert. For require: s.Require().NotNil(obj).
Common Mistakes
-
Forgetting
AssertExpectations(t)— mock expectations silently pass without verification -
is.Equal(ErrNotFound, err)— fails on wrapped errors. Useis.ErrorIsto walk the chain -
Swapped argument order — testify assumes
(expected, actual). Swapping produces backwards diffs -
assertfor guards — test continues after failure and panics on nil dereference. Userequire -
Missing
suite.Run()— without the launcher function, zero tests execute silently -
Comparing pointers —
is.Equal(ptr1, ptr2)compares addresses. Dereference or useEqualExportedValues
Linters
Use testifylint to catch wrong argument order, assert/require misuse, and more. See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-linter skill.
Cross-References
-
→ See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-testingskill for general test patterns, table-driven tests, and CI -
→ See
samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-linterskill for testifylint configuration
Weekly Installs718Repositorysamber/cc-skills-golangGitHub Stars1.1KFirst SeenMar 22, 2026Security AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled onopencode682cursor676codex673gemini-cli671github-copilot670amp669
User Reviews (0)
Write a Review
No reviews yet
Statistics
User Rating
Rate this Skill