G

golang-samber-lo

by @samberv
4.6(20)

Use samber/lo functional utility library to simplify Go collection operations, replacing manual loops with chained calls, reducing boilerplate code and improving readability.

functional-programmingcode-qualityutilitiesgenericsGitHub
Installation
npx skills add https://github.com/samber/cc-skills-golang --skill golang-samber-lo
compare_arrows

Before / After Comparison

1
Before

Manually writing for loops to iterate through slices, using temporary variables to store intermediate results. 50 lines of code to complete a filter-map-reduce operation, with scattered logic that is difficult to understand.

After

Using lo.Filter, lo.Map, and loReduce for chained calls. 3 lines of code to complete the same logic, with clear intent. Code lines reduced by 70%, and readability significantly improved.

SKILL.md

golang-samber-lo

Persona: You are a Go engineer who prefers declarative collection transforms over manual loops. You reach for lo to eliminate boilerplate, but you know when the stdlib is enough and when to upgrade to lop, lom, or loi.

samber/lo — Functional Utilities for Go

Lodash-inspired, generics-first utility library with 500+ type-safe helpers for slices, maps, strings, math, channels, tuples, and concurrency. Zero external dependencies. Immutable by default.

Official Resources:

This skill is not exhaustive. Please refer to library documentation and code examples for more information. Context7 can help as a discoverability platform.

Why samber/lo

Go's stdlib slices and maps packages cover ~10 basic helpers (sort, contains, keys). Everything else — Map, Filter, Reduce, GroupBy, Chunk, Flatten, Zip — requires manual for-loops. lo fills this gap:

  • Type-safe generics — no interface{} casts, no reflection, compile-time checking, no interface boxing overhead

  • Immutable by default — returns new collections, safe for concurrent reads, easier to reason about

  • Composable — functions take and return slices/maps, so they chain without wrapper types

  • Zero dependencies — only Go stdlib, no transitive dependency risk

  • Progressive complexity — start with lo, upgrade to lop/lom/loi only when profiling demands it

  • Error variants — most functions have Err suffixes (MapErr, FilterErr, ReduceErr) that stop on first error

Installation

go get github.com/samber/lo

Package Import Alias Go version

Core (immutable) github.com/samber/lo lo 1.18+

Parallel github.com/samber/lo/parallel lop 1.18+

Mutable github.com/samber/lo/mutable lom 1.18+

Iterator github.com/samber/lo/it loi 1.23+

SIMD (experimental) github.com/samber/lo/exp/simd — 1.25+ (amd64 only)

Choose the Right Package

Start with lo. Move to other packages only when profiling shows a bottleneck or when lazy evaluation is explicitly needed.

Package Use when Trade-off

lo Default for all transforms Allocates new collections (safe, predictable)

lop CPU-bound work on large datasets (1000+ items) Goroutine overhead; not for I/O or small slices

lom Hot path confirmed by pprof -alloc_objects Mutates input — caller must understand side effects

loi Large datasets with chained transforms (Go 1.23+) Lazy evaluation saves memory but adds iterator complexity

simd Numeric bulk ops after benchmarking (experimental) Unstable API, may break between versions

Key rules:

  • lop is for CPU parallelism, not I/O concurrency — for I/O fan-out, use errgroup instead

  • lom breaks immutability — only use when allocation pressure is measured, never assumed

  • loi eliminates intermediate allocations in chains like Map → Filter → Take by evaluating lazily

  • For reactive/streaming pipelines over infinite event streams, → see samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-ro skill + samber/ro package

For detailed package comparison and decision flowchart, see Package Guide.

Core Patterns

Transform a slice

// ✓ lo — declarative, type-safe
names := lo.Map(users, func(u User, _ int) string {
    return u.Name
})

// ✗ Manual — boilerplate, error-prone
names := make([]string, 0, len(users))
for _, u := range users {
    names = append(names, u.Name)
}

Filter + Reduce

total := lo.Reduce(
    lo.Filter(orders, func(o Order, _ int) bool {
        return o.Status == "paid"
    }),
    func(sum float64, o Order, _ int) float64 {
        return sum + o.Amount
    },
    0,
)

GroupBy

byStatus := lo.GroupBy(tasks, func(t Task, _ int) string {
    return t.Status
})
// map[string][]Task{"open": [...], "closed": [...]}

Error variant — stop on first error

results, err := lo.MapErr(urls, func(url string, _ int) (Response, error) {
    return http.Get(url)
})

Common Mistakes

Mistake Why it fails Fix

Using lo.Contains when slices.Contains exists Unnecessary dependency for a stdlib-covered op Prefer slices.Contains, slices.Sort, maps.Keys since Go 1.21+

Using lop.Map on 10 items Goroutine creation overhead exceeds transform cost Use lo.Maplop benefits start at ~1000+ items for CPU-bound work

Assuming lo.Filter modifies the input lo is immutable by default — it returns a new slice Use lom.Filter if you explicitly need in-place mutation

Using lo.Must in production code paths Must panics on error — fine in tests and init, dangerous in request handlers Use the non-Must variant and handle the error

Chaining many eager transforms on large data Each step allocates an intermediate slice Use loi (lazy iterators) to avoid intermediate allocations

Best Practices

  • Prefer stdlib when availableslices.Contains, slices.Sort, maps.Keys carry no dependency. Use lo for transforms the stdlib doesn't offer (Map, Filter, Reduce, GroupBy, Chunk, Flatten)

  • Compose lo functions — chain lo.Filterlo.Maplo.GroupBy instead of writing nested loops. Each function is a building block

  • Profile before optimizing — switch from lo to lom/lop only after go tool pprof confirms allocation or CPU as the bottleneck

  • Use error variants — prefer lo.MapErr over lo.Map + manual error collection. Error variants stop early and propagate cleanly

  • Use lo.Must only in tests and init — in production, handle errors explicitly

Quick Reference

Function What it does

lo.Map Transform each element

lo.Filter / lo.Reject Keep / remove elements matching predicate

lo.Reduce Fold elements into a single value

lo.ForEach Side-effect iteration

lo.GroupBy Group elements by key

lo.Chunk Split into fixed-size batches

lo.Flatten Flatten nested slices one level

lo.Uniq / lo.UniqBy Remove duplicates

lo.Find / lo.FindOrElse First match or default

lo.Contains / lo.Every / lo.Some Membership tests

lo.Keys / lo.Values Extract map keys or values

lo.PickBy / lo.OmitBy Filter map entries

lo.Zip2 / lo.Unzip2 Pair/unpair two slices

lo.Range / lo.RangeFrom Generate number sequences

lo.Ternary / lo.If Inline conditionals

lo.ToPtr / lo.FromPtr Pointer helpers

lo.Must / lo.Try Panic-on-error / recover-as-bool

lo.Async / lo.Attempt Async execution / retry with backoff

lo.Debounce / lo.Throttle Rate limiting

lo.ChannelDispatcher Fan-out to multiple channels

For the complete function catalog (300+ functions), see API Reference.

For composition patterns, stdlib interop, and iterator pipelines, see Advanced Patterns.

If you encounter a bug or unexpected behavior in samber/lo, open an issue at github.com/samber/lo/issues.

Cross-References

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-ro skill for reactive/streaming pipelines over infinite event streams (samber/ro package)

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-samber-mo skill for monadic types (Option, Result, Either) that compose with lo transforms

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-data-structures skill for choosing the right underlying data structure

  • → See samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance skill for profiling methodology before switching to lom/lop

Weekly Installs683Repositorysamber/cc-skills-golangGitHub Stars1.1KFirst SeenMar 22, 2026Security AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled onopencode664cursor658codex655gemini-cli653github-copilot652amp651

User Reviews (0)

Write a Review

Effect
Usability
Docs
Compatibility

No reviews yet

Statistics

Installs32.0K
Rating4.6 / 5.0
Version
Updated2026年7月9日
Comparisons1

User Rating

4.6(20)
5
75%
4
25%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

Rate this Skill

0.0

Compatible Platforms

🔧Claude Code

Timeline

Created2026年4月9日
Last Updated2026年7月9日
🎁 Agent Knowledge Cards
Survey