P
proposal-writer
by @ncklrsv
4.6(11)
プロの営業提案および価格提示戦略家として、このスキルはユーザーが説得力のあるビジネス提案を作成し、明確で効果的な価格表示を設計して顧客を獲得するのに役立ちます。
Business Proposal WritingGrant WritingTechnical WritingPersuasive CommunicationMarket ResearchGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add ncklrs/startup-os-skills --skill proposal-writercompare_arrows
Before / After 効果比較
1 组使用前
営業提案書と価格提示プレゼンテーションは戦略性に欠け、顧客を惹きつけにくく、成約率が低い。内容の構成が混乱しており、製品の価値と利点を効果的に強調できていません。
使用後
専門家による戦略的指導を受け、非常に説得力のある営業提案書と価格提示プレゼンテーションを作成します。製品の価値を効果的に示し、顧客の信頼を高め、成約率を大幅に向上させます。
description SKILL.md
name: proposal-writer description: Expert sales proposal and pricing presentation strategist. Use when writing proposals, executive summaries, ROI business cases, pricing presentations, SOWs (Statement of Work), RFP responses, or competitive positioning documents. Covers proposal structure, terms positioning, design formatting, follow-up strategy, and win-rate optimization.
Proposal Writer
Strategic expertise for crafting winning sales proposals, pricing presentations, and RFP responses that close deals.
Philosophy
Great proposals don't describe your product. They describe your buyer's future success.
The best sales proposals:
- Lead with outcomes, not features — Buyers care about their results, not your capabilities
- Make the decision easy — Remove friction, objections, and confusion
- Tell a story — Context → Challenge → Solution → Success
- Respect the reader's time — Every section earns its place
How This Skill Works
When invoked, apply the guidelines in rules/ organized by:
structure-*— Proposal architecture, components, flowexecutive-*— Executive summary, C-level communicationpricing-*— Pricing presentation, anchoring, packagingsow-*— Statement of Work, deliverables, timelinesrfp-*— RFP response strategy, compliance, win themesdesign-*— Formatting, layout, visual hierarchystrategy-*— Competitive positioning, follow-up, negotiation
Core Frameworks
The Proposal Pyramid
┌─────────────────┐
│ Executive │ ← Why this matters (1 page)
│ Summary │
├─────────────────┤
│ Solution & │ ← How we solve it (2-3 pages)
│ Approach │
├─────────────────┤
│ Investment & │ ← What it costs (1-2 pages)
│ Timeline │
├─────────────────┤
│ Proof & │ ← Why trust us (1-2 pages)
│ Credibility │
└─────────────────┘
Proposal Types by Deal Stage
| Type | Purpose | Length | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| One-Pager | Early qualification | 1 page | Same day |
| Solution Brief | Mid-funnel engagement | 3-5 pages | 2-3 days |
| Full Proposal | Final presentation | 8-15 pages | 5-10 days |
| RFP Response | Formal bid | Variable | Per deadline |
| SOW | Contract scope | 3-10 pages | Post-verbal |
The CLOSE Framework
Every proposal section should CLOSE:
- Context — Where the buyer is today
- Loss — What it's costing them (pain)
- Outcome — The desired future state
- Solution — How you get them there
- Evidence — Proof it works
Pricing Presentation Matrix
| Element | Purpose | Placement |
|---|---|---|
| Value Summary | Anchor on ROI before price | Before pricing |
| Investment Options | Give control, not ultimatum | 2-3 tiers |
| Package Comparison | Make preferred option obvious | Side-by-side table |
| Terms & Conditions | Reduce friction | After pricing |
| Next Steps | Create momentum | Final section |
Proposal Win Factors
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PROPOSAL SUCCESS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 40% — Relationship & access (built before proposal) │
│ 25% — Solution fit (do you solve the problem?) │
│ 20% — Presentation (is it compelling and clear?) │
│ 15% — Pricing (is it defensible and competitive?) │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Proposal Components
| Component | Required | Purpose | Common Mistakes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cover Page | Yes | First impression, branding | Generic, no personalization |
| Executive Summary | Yes | Decision-maker snapshot | Too long, feature-focused |
| Understanding | Yes | Prove you listened | Assumptions, not discovery |
| Solution Overview | Yes | What you propose | Feature dump |
| Approach/Methodology | Depends | How you'll do it | Too technical |
| Timeline | Yes | When they get value | Unrealistic dates |
| Investment | Yes | Total cost of ownership | Hidden costs surface later |
| Team/About Us | Optional | Build confidence | Self-congratulatory |
| Case Studies | Recommended | Social proof | Irrelevant industry |
| Terms & Conditions | Yes | Protect both parties | Buried gotchas |
| Next Steps | Yes | Drive action | Vague, no urgency |
Anti-Patterns
- Feature dumping — Listing everything you can do vs. what they need
- One-size-fits-all — Using templates without customization
- Price-first — Showing cost before establishing value
- Competitor bashing — Direct attacks backfire; focus on your strengths
- Wall of text — No visual hierarchy, hard to scan
- Jargon overload — Internal terminology the buyer doesn't know
- Missing next steps — Proposal ends with no clear action
- Over-promising — Timelines and outcomes you can't deliver
- Ghosting — No follow-up strategy after sending
forumユーザーレビュー (0)
レビューを書く
効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性
レビューなし
統計データ
インストール数760
評価4.6 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年3月16日
比較事例1 件
ユーザー評価
4.6(11)
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
この Skill を評価
0.0
対応プラットフォーム
🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI
タイムライン
作成2026年3月16日
最終更新2026年3月16日