R

request-refactor-plan

by @mattpocockv
4.5(21)

ユーザーインタビューに基づいて、小さなコミットを含む詳細なリファクタリング計画を作成します。(AIエージェントスキル、作業効率と自動化能力を向上)

code-refactoringsoftware-designtechnical-debtcode-qualityarchitectural-planningGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add mattpocock/skills --skill request-refactor-plan
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1
使用前

バックエンドのコードリファクタリングは、明確な計画が不足しがちで、プロセスが混乱し、リスクが高まります。大規模なリファクタリングを管理可能な小さなコミットに分解することが難しく、開発の進捗に影響を与えます。

使用後

このスキルは、ユーザーインタビューを通じて詳細なリファクタリング計画を作成し、それを微小なコミットに分割します。これにより、リファクタリングのリスクを大幅に低減し、コード品質を確保し、開発効率を向上させます。

SKILL.md

This skill will be invoked when the user wants to create a refactor request. You should go through the steps below. You may skip steps if you don't consider them necessary.

  1. Ask the user for a long, detailed description of the problem they want to solve and any potential ideas for solutions.

  2. Explore the repo to verify their assertions and understand the current state of the codebase.

  3. Ask whether they have considered other options, and present other options to them.

  4. Interview the user about the implementation. Be extremely detailed and thorough.

  5. Hammer out the exact scope of the implementation. Work out what you plan to change and what you plan not to change.

  6. Look in the codebase to check for test coverage of this area of the codebase. If there is insufficient test coverage, ask the user what their plans for testing are.

  7. Break the implementation into a plan of tiny commits. Remember Martin Fowler's advice to "make each refactoring step as small as possible, so that you can always see the program working."

  8. Create a GitHub issue with the refactor plan. Use the following template for the issue description:

Problem Statement

The problem that the developer is facing, from the developer's perspective.

Solution

The solution to the problem, from the developer's perspective.

Commits

A LONG, detailed implementation plan. Write the plan in plain English, breaking down the implementation into the tiniest commits possible. Each commit should leave the codebase in a working state.

Decision Document

A list of implementation decisions that were made. This can include:

  • The modules that will be built/modified
  • The interfaces of those modules that will be modified
  • Technical clarifications from the developer
  • Architectural decisions
  • Schema changes
  • API contracts
  • Specific interactions

Do NOT include specific file paths or code snippets. They may end up being outdated very quickly.

Testing Decisions

A list of testing decisions that were made. Include:

  • A description of what makes a good test (only test external behavior, not implementation details)
  • Which modules will be tested
  • Prior art for the tests (i.e. similar types of tests in the codebase)

Out of Scope

A description of the things that are out of scope for this refactor.

Further Notes (optional)

Any further notes about the refactor.

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数7.3K
評価4.5 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年5月19日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.5(21)
5
48%
4
52%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

タイムライン

作成2026年3月17日
最終更新2026年5月19日