R

related-work-writing

by @lingzhi227v
4.3(120)

このスキルは論文の貢献を自動分析し、テーマ別に文献を整理して高品質なRelated Workセクションを生成します。学術論文のRelated Work部分の作成や改訂に最適で、包括的な引用と明確な比較を実現し、執筆効率と品質を大幅に向上させます。

related-workacademic-writingliterature-reviewcitationpaper-writingGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add https://github.com/lingzhi227/agent-research-skills --skill related-work-writing
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1
使用前

ユーザーが手動で文献を整理し、テーマ別に構成し、比較段落を作成するには多くの時間がかかり、重要な引用を見落としたり、構造が混乱したりして、頻繁な修正が必要になります。

使用後

このスキルは、構造化され引用が完全なRelated Workセクションをワンクリックで生成し、手動調整を減らし、微調整のみで済ませます。

SKILL.md

Related Work Writing

Generate publication-quality Related Work sections with proper citations and thematic organization.

Input

  • $0 — Current paper draft or method description
  • $1 — Collected literature (BibTeX entries, paper summaries, or literature review notes)

References

  • Related work writing prompts and strategies: ~/.claude/skills/related-work-writing/references/related-work-prompts.md

Workflow

Step 1: Analyze the Paper's Contributions

  • Read the current paper draft (especially Methods and Introduction)
  • Identify the key contributions and novelty claims
  • List the technical components that need literature context

Step 2: Organize Literature by Theme

Group related papers into thematic clusters:

  • Each cluster should represent a research direction or technique
  • Common themes: problem formulation, methodology family, application domain, evaluation approach
  • Order themes from most to least relevant to your work

Step 3: Write Each Theme Paragraph

For each thematic group:

  1. Topic sentence — Introduce the research direction
  2. Describe key works — Summarize 2-5 representative papers
  3. Compare and contrast — How does each approach differ from yours?
  4. Transition — Connect to the next theme or to your contribution

Step 4: Refine

  • Ensure every cited paper has a clear reason for inclusion
  • Check that your work's novelty is clear from the comparisons
  • Verify all \cite{} keys exist in the .bib file
  • Aim for 1-2 pages (single column) or 0.5-1 page (double column)

Rules

  • Compare and contrast, don't just describe — "Unlike [X] which assumes..., our method..."
  • Organize by theme, not chronologically — Group by research direction
  • Cite broadly — Not just the most popular papers; include recent and diverse work
  • Be fair — Acknowledge strengths of prior work before stating limitations
  • Explain inapplicability — If a method could apply to your setting, explain why you don't compare experimentally, or add it to experiments
  • Use present tense for established facts — "Smith et al. propose..." or "This approach uses..."
  • End with positioning — The final paragraph should clearly position your work relative to all discussed prior work

Related Skills

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数1.2K
評価4.3 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年7月26日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.3(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🤖claude-code

タイムライン

作成2026年7月26日
最終更新2026年7月26日
🎁 Agent 知識カード
アンケート