ホーム/テクニカルライティング/plannotator-visual-explainer
P

plannotator-visual-explainer

by @backnotpropv
4.5(120)

この Skill は、複雑な実装計画、設計ドキュメント、PR 変更、アーキテクチャ図などの技術コンテンツを、構造が明確で視覚的に豊かな説明ドキュメントとして自動生成します。コンテンツタイプに応じたテンプレートと視覚コンポーネントで、技術詳細の迅速な理解を促進し、コミュニケーション効率とドキュメント品質を向上させます。

technical-writingdocumentationvisual-communicationarchitecturecode-explanationGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add https://github.com/backnotprop/plannotator --skill plannotator-visual-explainer
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1 组
使用前

この Skill がない場合、ユーザーや開発者は複雑な実装計画、設計ドキュメント、またはコード変更の説明を手動で整理し、読むのに多くの時間を費やします。ドキュメント構造が不統一なため、重要な情報を素早く見つけることが難しく、理解効率が低下し、プロジェクトの遅延につながります。

使用後

この Skill は、構造が明確で視覚的に豊かな説明ドキュメントを自動生成し、複雑な技術コンテンツを理解しやすい形式に変換します。ユーザーは迅速に要点を把握でき、理解時間を大幅に短縮し、意思決定プロセスを加速させ、チームのコラボレーション効率を向上させます。

SKILL.md

Plannotator Visual Explainer

Three paths depending on content type. Each has its own references and structure.

Route by content type

Implementation plan, design doc, or proposal → Follow the Plan path. Read references/design-system.md and references/svg-patterns.md. Prescriptive structure.

PR explainer, diff review, or code change walkthrough → Follow the PR path. Read references/design-system.md and references/pr-components.md. Prescriptive structure.

Everything else (architecture diagrams, data tables, slide decks, project recaps, general visual explanations) → Follow the Visual explainer path. Delegates to nicobailon/visual-explainer with Plannotator theme tokens.

Delivery

Always deliver via Plannotator's annotation UI. Do NOT use open or xdg-open.

Plans/proposals (user should approve/deny):

plannotator annotate <file> --gate

Everything else (informational):

plannotator annotate <file>

Plan path

For implementation plans, design docs, feature specs, migration guides, and proposals.

Before generating, read:

  1. references/design-system.md — Plannotator theme tokens, typography, component patterns
  2. references/svg-patterns.md — inline SVG building blocks for architecture diagrams, flowcharts, data flow

Document structure (in order, pick what fits):

  1. Header — eyebrow label (mono, uppercase), title (serif, large), prompt box (the original brief)
  2. Summary strip — 3-5 stat cards showing key numbers at a glance (components, endpoints, tables, etc.)
  3. Milestones / timeline — vertical timeline showing phases without time estimates. Phases show sequence and dependencies, not duration.
  4. Architecture / data flow — inline SVG diagram. Use for 3+ interacting components. Highlighted boxes for new components, dashed arrows for async paths.
  5. Mockups — build UI mockups in HTML/CSS directly, not as descriptions
  6. Key code — dark-theme code blocks with syntax highlighting. Only architecturally significant interfaces/schemas — not every function.
  7. Risks & mitigations — table with severity badges (HIGH/MED/LOW)
  8. Open questions — callout cards with decision owner ("Decide with: backend team")

Not every plan needs every section. Skip what doesn't serve the content. Never include time estimates, boilerplate sections, or exhaustive file lists.

Adapt to the task: Backend → lead with data flow. Frontend → lead with mockups. Refactoring → lead with before/after diagrams. Infrastructure → lead with architecture.

Quality bar: The plan answers "what, why, and how" within 30 seconds of reading. Whitespace is a feature — one idea per viewport.


PR path

For PR walkthroughs, diff reviews, code change explainers, and reviewer guides.

Before generating, read:

  1. references/design-system.md — Plannotator theme tokens, typography, component patterns
  2. references/pr-components.md — diff rendering, review comment bubbles, risk chips, file cards, before/after panels

Document structure (in order, pick what fits):

  1. Header — PR title, meta strip (file count, +/- lines, branch, author)
  2. TL;DR — bordered card with primary accent left border. 2-3 sentences. Readers who see nothing else should get the gist.
  3. Why — motivation and before/after comparison (two-column grid)
  4. File tour — collapsible cards per file. Each has: file path + badge (NEW/MOD/DEL) + line stats, a "why" paragraph, and important diff hunks. High-risk files expanded, safe files collapsed.
  5. Risk map — visual chips showing which files need careful review vs. which are mechanical. Three tiers: attention (destructive), medium (warning), safe (success).
  6. Where to focus — numbered callout cards. Each names a file/function and describes the concern.
  7. Test plan — checkbox-style verification checklist
  8. Rollout (if applicable) — phased deployment with feature flags

Use Pierre diffs via CDN for syntax-highlighted inline diffs — see references/pr-components.md for the pattern.


Visual explainer path

For architecture diagrams, data tables, slide decks, project recaps, comparisons, and any other visual explanation.

Before generating:

  1. Ensure visual-explainer is installed:
    • Check: ~/.claude/skills/visual-explainer/SKILL.md or ~/.agents/skills/visual-explainer/SKILL.md
    • If not found: npx skills add nicobailon/visual-explainer -g --yes
  2. Read visual-explainer's SKILL.md (workflow, diagram types, anti-slop rules)
  3. Read the relevant visual-explainer references and templates for your content type
  4. Read references/theme-override.md — Plannotator tokens replacing Nico's palettes

Follow visual-explainer's structure, component classes (.ve-card, .kpi-card, .pipeline), and anti-slop rules. The only override is the color/typography layer — Plannotator tokens instead of Nico's custom palettes.


Design philosophy (all paths)

  • Whitespace is a feature. Generous padding, large section gaps. If cramped, add space — don't shrink text.
  • One idea per viewport. Hero section, then diagram, then detail grid — not all crammed together.
  • Show, don't describe. A timeline shows sequencing. A diagram shows relationships. A code block shows the interface.
  • No time estimates. Timelines show phases and dependencies. Never attach hour/day estimates.

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数12.2K
評価4.5 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年10月23日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.5(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🤖claude-code

タイムライン

作成2026年6月25日
最終更新2026年10月23日
🎁 Agent 知識カード
アンケート