M

mantis-report

by @googlev
4.3(120)

この Skill は、複雑で技術的な脆弱性検出ログを、開発者や関係者向けの読みやすいセキュリティレビューパケットに統合します。今回と過去のパスで確認された脆弱性やエクスプロイトチェーン、スナップショットの来歴をまとめ、パス別タグ付き Markdown レポートと常に最新のコピーを生成して、修正対応や関係者への共有を支援します。

security-reportvulnerability-reportingpenetration-testingmarkdown-reportexploit-chainGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add https://github.com/google/mantis --skill mantis-report
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1 组
使用前

開発者が複数の JSON ログに散らばる脆弱性を手作業で抜き出し、重複を除いてエクスプロイトチェーンを組み立て、書式も何度も直すため、過去の検出が抜けやすい。

使用後

この Skill は今回と過去のパスで確認された検出を自動で統合し、最新状態に重複排除してスナップショットの来歴を付け、構造化された Markdown レポートパケットと最新版コピーを出力します。

SKILL.md

Reporter (/mantis-report)

System Goal

Security Reporting Expert. Synthesizes complex, technical finding logs into a high-quality, human-readable review packet for developers and stakeholders.

Command Definition

  • Command: /mantis-report
  • Description: Generates a human-readable security review packet containing confirmed findings and exploit chains.

Input/Output Contract

  • Reads:
    • workspace/findings/*.json (all active finding files for this pass).
    • workspace/archive/findings_pass_*/*.json (archived findings from prior passes) and legacy workspace/archive/loop*_findings/*.json. The report is a campaign-wide view: this pass's full findings plus carried-forward findings that prior passes stopped retrying (e.g. hit the retry cap) so they do not vanish from the report.
    • workspace/.mantis_state.json (to track current loop pass, and to read vcs_info and active_snapshot {root, snapshot_id, snapshot_pinned} for provenance).
    • Per-finding snapshot provenance fields, all OPTIONAL: discovery_commit, repro_snapshot_id, patch_base_snapshot. When any is absent/empty it is rendered as "(not recorded)" — never a reason to drop a finding.
  • Writes:
    • workspace/report/review_packet_pass_<N>_<snapshot_tag>.md (pass- and snapshot-tagged markdown report). Falls back to the unsuffixed review_packet_pass_<N>.md on a legacy pass with no recorded snapshot.
    • Updates copy/symlink at workspace/report/review_packet-latest.md.
  • Preconditions:
    • Calibrated and reproduced findings exist in workspace/findings/ or workspace/archive/. The report is a campaign-wide view: it reports the current state of every unresolved finding discovered in this or any prior pass, de-duplicated to each finding's latest state. A confirmed-but-unfixed finding that plan stopped carrying back (e.g. it hit the 2-attempt retry cap) does NOT vanish — it appears here at its most recent archived state.
  • Idempotency Guarantee:
    • Writes to pass-and-snapshot-tagged files. In-place overwrite of review_packet-latest.md. Re-running the SAME pass on the SAME snapshot updates the same tagged file. Re-running the same pass number on a DIFFERENT snapshot writes a DISTINCT file (the <snapshot_tag> suffix prevents cross-snapshot overwrite). Legacy passes with no recorded snapshot keep the unsuffixed review_packet_pass_<N>.md name and overwrite in place, exactly as before.

Instructions

Step 0 — Locator Resolution.

LOCATOR RESOLUTION (before reading ANY target code or artifact):
0. ROLE: If this skill NEVER reads target source (report, calibrate, reflect),
   you are a FINDINGS-ONLY stage: skip steps 2-6; still read active_snapshot from
   state for provenance/annotation; NEVER stop merely because a code root is unset.
1. Determine CODE_ROOT, in this priority order:
   a. If --target_root is passed on THIS invocation, CODE_ROOT = --target_root.
      It is AUTHORITATIVE and OVERRIDES SNAPSHOT_ROOT and the state fallback
      (used when a caller hands you a prepared tree, e.g. a patched shadow).
   b. Else if --snapshot_root (or SNAPSHOT_ROOT) is passed, use it.
   c. Else read state_root/workspace/.mantis_state.json (state_root from
      --state_root if passed, else ./workspace/... relative to the current dir)
      -> active_snapshot.root / .snapshot_id / .snapshot_pinned.
   d. Else (no arg AND no readable active_snapshot): CODE_ROOT = current directory,
      treat snapshot_pinned = false (MODE-OFF). Do NOT stop.
2. SENTINEL CHECK (only if snapshot_pinned is true AND you did NOT take path 1a):
   verify CODE_ROOT/.mantis_snapshot_id exists and equals SNAPSHOT_ID. If missing
   or different -> STOP "snapshot sentinel mismatch". (A --target_root tree (1a) is
   deliberately mutated and is sentinel-EXEMPT.)
3. PATH FIELDS:
   - SNAPSHOT-RELATIVE (read under CODE_ROOT): code_paths entries; plan target_files
     that are file paths. Strip ONLY a trailing ":<digits>". A code_paths entry
     containing "://" is a URL/endpoint, NOT a file read. A code_paths entry that is
     NOT of the form <existing-path>:<integer> is a non-source LOCATOR
     (symbol/offset/endpoint): only check that the artifact/symbol exists; skip ALL
     line-range and line-existence logic.
   - STATE-RELATIVE (read/write under state_root/workspace, NEVER prefix CODE_ROOT):
     kb_references, repro_file_path, reattack_file_path, helper scripts, report
     files, and all state/findings JSON.
4. Never WRITE under CODE_ROOT when snapshot_pinned is true. Any command that
   compiles, generates, or writes artifacts MUST run in a PRIVATE SHADOW copy
   (mktemp -d from CODE_ROOT), never with cwd=CODE_ROOT. Read-only inspection may
   cd into CODE_ROOT.
5. VCS-METADATA CARVE-OUT: history-log extraction and any VCS diff/blame command
   run in the LIVE repository root (which still has .git/.hg/.repo), NOT CODE_ROOT
   (the snapshot copy strips VCS metadata). Do NOT stop merely because CODE_ROOT
   lacks .git/.hg/.repo.
6. Every shell command uses ABSOLUTE paths and sets its own working directory on
   that call. Do NOT assume the working directory persists between calls.

Then the following FINDINGS-ONLY notes apply to the Reporter:

  • The Reporter is a FINDINGS-ONLY stage (Block A, ROLE step 0): it SKIPS locator steps 2–6, does NOT require or resolve a CODE_ROOT, and NEVER stops because a code root or sentinel is unset.
  • It STILL reads active_snapshot (root, snapshot_id, snapshot_pinned) and vcs_info from workspace/.mantis_state.json for provenance — used to build the header, the top banners, and the output file name.
  • Every path the Reporter touches (workspace/findings/*.json, workspace/.mantis_state.json, workspace/report/*, workspace/archive/*) is STATE-RELATIVE and is NEVER prefixed with CODE_ROOT.

Compile a professional Markdown report detailing the verified/reproduced vulnerabilities and exploit chains.

Execute the reporting stage as follows:

  1. Load findings — this pass in full, plus carried-forward open findings (newest-first fold; no script). Build a working set keyed by finding identity, each finding once at its most-recent state:

    SAME-BUG PREDICATE (used for ALL current↔archived dedup, fold, and suppression in this stage; over-reporting is always safe here, hiding a real finding is never acceptable): two findings are the SAME BUG only if EITHER (i) they have the exact same id (UUID); OR (ii) ALL THREE hold — they share a non-empty lineage_id, they share a non-empty signature, AND at least one code_paths entry compared WITH its trailing :line (line-inclusive) is identical between them. Otherwise they are DISTINCT — render BOTH. NEVER treat two findings as the same bug on lineage_id alone or signature alone: both are coarser than a bug's true identity (basename-derived lineage can link two distinct same-named files; a signature strips the line number so it collides between distinct same-file bugs), and collapsing on either alone can silently drop a real finding.

    Design note (re-anchoring vs fold): mantis-plan's re-anchoring (Phase 2) only provides a line hint that steers RE-DISCOVER — it does NOT rewrite the carried finding's code_paths. A re-discovered finding surfaces at its NEW line on the current snapshot. Because the fold predicate requires a line-inclusive code_paths match, the re-discovered finding will NOT fold with its ancestor (the line numbers differ). This is SAFE over-reporting — both entries render, the current one shows the new location. A future phase could relax the predicate to path-only matching when BOTH findings carry the same signature AND lineage_id AND the ancestor's line is confirmed absent on the current snapshot, but the conservative line-inclusive match is used today to prevent any silent-drop risk.

    1. Read all active workspace/findings/*.json and add every active finding to the working set, keyed by its id (UUID) — all remediation statuses, so this pass's VERIFIED_SECURE/MITIGATION_PROPOSED fixes still render with their patches in Categories 1/2. NEVER collapse two ACTIVE findings, even if they share a lineage_id or signature — keep each active id as its own entry.
    2. Scan workspace/archive/findings_pass_<N>/ (and legacy loop<N>_findings/) in descending pass order. Add an archived finding only if it is still OPEN (see 4) AND NO finding already in the working set is the SAME BUG as it (per the predicate above) AND no earlier (higher-pass) archived copy of the SAME BUG was already added. First copy met = latest state; ignore later same-bug copies in lower dirs. (An archived finding is suppressed ONLY when a genuine same-bug supersedes it; a mere lineage_id or signature coincidence does NOT suppress it.)
    3. Supersession fold (Phase 3): When an archived finding IS the SAME BUG (predicate ii) as a current finding, the current finding supersedes it — show a single entry at the current (most-recent) state; do not also render the archived copy. When the predicate is NOT satisfied (different signature, e.g. a file rename, or lineage_id absent), render both as separate entries (safe over-reporting, never hiding).
      • Under-reporting safeguard: If the current (superseding) finding FAILS the actionable predicate (step 4 below) but the archived ancestor would have PASSED it (e.g., the ancestor was reproduced and OPEN, but the current pass's reproduce resulted in not_attempted due to a transient build/environment failure on the new snapshot), do NOT let the transient downgrade suppress the confirmed-open bug. Instead, keep the ancestor's last confirmed state visible in the report (render it with a note "Open — repro pending on new snapshot") so a previously-confirmed bug can never silently disappear from the report. The current finding's newer metadata (e.g., updated code_paths line numbers) may still be attached as an annotation, but the verdict/status shown must be the ancestor's last confirmed state, never the transient downgrade.
    4. Actionable / quality predicate (applies to active AND archived): include a finding only if it is an exploit chain (constituent_findings present, or "Exploit Chain" in title/history) OR repro_status is reproduced OR (repro_status is statically_confirmed AND it carries empirical execution evidence — an external stack trace, sanitizer trace (ASan/UBSan/MSan/TSan), or crash log). Do not include false positives, NON_VIABLE, DUPLICATE, failed_to_reproduce, or ordinary statically_confirmed findings lacking empirical traces.
    5. Open predicate (archived carry-forward in step 2 only): an archived finding is "still open" if it satisfies (4) AND patch_status is NOT VERIFIED_SECURE/MITIGATION_PROPOSED AND status is not FALSE_POSITIVE/DUPLICATE AND production_viability is not NON_VIABLE. (Active findings are loaded regardless of patch_status so this pass's fixes still appear; archived fixed findings are not re-listed every pass — use the optional "Resolved this campaign" rollup for a cumulative fixed view.)
    6. Scale: process one directory at a time, newest-first; never load the whole archive at once.
    • Severity Filtering: Exclude findings with a priority of "LOW" from the main report body. You must place these lower-priority issues into a separate, dedicated "Appendix: Low Priority Findings" section at the very end of the report, keeping the main report focused on high-risk issues.
  2. Extract Key Artifacts: For each reproduced finding, extract and format:

    • Header Metadata: Title, ID (UUID), Inferred Exposure, Final Risk Score, and Qualitative Priority.
    • Campaign Provenance: Annotate each open finding with the pass it was first discovered in vs. the current pass (e.g. discovered pass 2 · still open as of pass 7), so carried-over findings are visible as such. First-seen = the lowest pass_number in the finding's history entries (or the pass_number of the lowest-numbered archive dir that contains it); current state = the copy you kept from the fold above.
    • Duplicate Advisory: If the finding has a possible_duplicate_of field (set by mantis-dedupe when a cross-pass candidate was NOT_MATCHED), emit an advisory note: Possibly related to finding <UUID> (cross-pass candidate; snapshots differ — not confirmed duplicate). This makes the advisory regression-pointer visible to the stakeholder.
    • Discovery Snapshot: Emit Discovery Snapshot: <discovery_commit> for the finding. If discovery_commit is missing or empty, emit Discovery Snapshot: (legacy — not recorded). Never omit or drop the finding because this field is absent.
    • Vulnerability Description & Impact: A clear explanation of the bug and the concrete impact on the system.
    • Reproduction Evidence:
      • The PoC script path (repro_file_path) and execution command (run_command).
      • A clean snippet of the stdout/stderr showing the successful exploit trigger (repro_output).
      • Evidence base: label the reproduction evidence with the snapshot it was gathered on: Evidence base: <repro_snapshot_id>. If repro_snapshot_id is missing or empty, write Evidence base: (not recorded). Do NOT assume it equals the header/pass snapshot.
    • Risk Rationale: The independent validation reasoning (reasoning), production viability reasoning (critic_reasoning), and outrage factor analysis (outrage_commentary).
    • Remediation & Patch:
      • The recommended mitigation strategy.
      • The verified patch diff (patch_diff) and re-attack status to prove the fix is resilient.
      • Apply against: label the patch diff with the snapshot it applies to: Apply against: <patch_base_snapshot>. If patch_base_snapshot is missing or empty, write Apply against: (not recorded). If patch_base_snapshot is present and differs from this finding's discovery_commit, add a one-line caution that the diff was generated against a different snapshot and may not apply cleanly to the discovery snapshot.
    • PII & Secrets Redaction: Before writing any finding data (including description, PoC script/command, and reproducer logs) to the report, you must scan and redact any hardcoded API keys, tokens, credentials, PII

...

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数1.5K
評価4.3 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年10月18日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.3(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🤖claude-code

タイムライン

作成2026年10月18日
最終更新2026年10月18日
🎁 Agent 知識カード
アンケート