I

implement-specs

by @warpdotdevv
4.3(120)

承認されたPRODUCT.mdおよびTECH.mdに基づいて機能を実装し、実装の進化に合わせて仕様とコードを同じPR内で同期させます。このスキルは、製品および技術仕様が承認され、機能構築の次のステップに進む際に使用します。

feature-implementationspec-alignmentdevelopment-workflowpr-managementcode-consistencyGitHub
インストール方法
git clone https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills.git
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1
使用前

明確な仕様同期プロセスがない場合、開発者は機能実装後に製品または技術仕様との不一致を発見し、多大な手戻り作業とリリースサイクルの遅延を招く可能性があります。

使用後

同じPR内で仕様とコードを同期させることで、開発者は不一致を迅速に特定し解決できます。これにより、仕様のずれによる手戻り作業が大幅に削減され、開発効率とコード品質が向上します。

SKILL.md

implement-specs

Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md.

Overview

Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved. The goal is to build the feature described by the specs while keeping the checked-in specs and the implementation aligned as the work evolves.

Approved specs should live directly under a ticket-named directory in specs/, for example specs/APP-1234/PRODUCT.md and specs/APP-1234/TECH.md.

In many cases, the implementation should be pushed in the same PR as the product and tech specs. As the engineer iterates, changes to PRODUCT.md, TECH.md, and the code should all be pushed in that same PR so review stays anchored to the feature that will actually ship.

Prerequisites

Before using this skill:

  • confirm that PRODUCT.md exists
  • confirm that TECH.md exists when the feature warranted one
  • confirm that the relevant specs have been reviewed and approved enough to start implementation

Workflow

1. Read the approved specs first

Treat:

  • PRODUCT.md as the source of truth for user-facing behavior
  • TECH.md as the source of truth for architecture, sequencing, and implementation shape

Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.

2. Offer optional implementation aids for large features

For large or long-running features, optionally offer one of these aids to the user before implementation begins:

  • PROJECT_LOG.md to track checkpoints, explored paths, partial findings, and current implementation state
  • DECISIONS.md to capture concrete product and technical decisions made during the PRD and tech design process

These are optional aids, not required deliverables. Offer them when they would reduce confusion or help future agents avoid re-exploring the same paths.

3. Plan and implement against the specs

Break the work into concrete implementation steps, then implement the feature against the approved specs.

During implementation:

  • keep behavior aligned with PRODUCT.md
  • keep architecture and sequencing aligned with TECH.md
  • add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands

Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.

4. Update specs as the implementation evolves

If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.

In particular:

  • update PRODUCT.md when user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change
  • update TECH.md when architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change
  • keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes

The PR should describe the feature that actually ships, not just the initial draft of the specs.

5. Verify against the specs

Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.

Prefer:

  • unit tests and regression coverage that follow the repository's local testing conventions
  • integration or end-to-end tests for important user flows

Best Practices

  • Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.
  • Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.
  • Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.
  • Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.

Related Skills

  • spec-driven-implementation
  • write-product-spec
  • write-tech-spec

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数1.8K
評価4.3 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年5月23日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.3(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🤖claude-code

タイムライン

作成2026年5月22日
最終更新2026年5月23日