C

company-valuation

by @himself65v
4.3(120)

このスキルは、DCF、相対評価、セグメント別評価の3つの方法で企業の内在株価を自動計算し、WACC-成長率感応度表と強気/中立/弱気シナリオを生成します。投資分析や財務モデリングに最適で、評価作業の効率を大幅に向上します。

valuationdcffinancial-modelingequity-researchinvestmentGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add https://github.com/himself65/finance-skills --skill company-valuation
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1
使用前

このスキルがない場合、ユーザーは財務データの手動収集、WACCの計算、DCFモデルの構築、類似企業の発見と中央値倍率の計算を行う必要があり、通常8時間以上かかり、エラーが発生しやすかった。

使用後

このスキルは自動でデータを取得し、3つの評価方法を実行して完全なレポートを生成します。ユーザーはティッカーシンボルを入力するだけで、数分でプロフェッショナルレベルの評価結果を得られます。

SKILL.md

Company Valuation

Triangulates intrinsic value via three methods, then blends them to an implied share price:

  1. DCF — 5-year FCFF projection, discount at WACC, terminal value.
  2. Relative — apply peer median P/E, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA.
  3. SOTP — when 2+ distinct reporting segments exist, value each at pure-play peer multiples.

Always present a WACC × terminal-growth sensitivity table and Bull/Base/Bear scenarios.

Disclaimer: Research/educational output. Not financial advice.


Step 1: Detection Flow

Detect data source and runtime deps. The skill supports 3 method paths — pick the richest one available.

Environment status:

!`python3 -c "import yfinance, numpy, pandas; print('YFIN_OK')" 2>/dev/null || echo "YFIN_MISSING"`
!`(command -v funda && funda --version) 2>/dev/null || echo "FUNDA_CLI_MISSING"`
!`python3 -c "import yfinance as yf; t=yf.Ticker('^TNX'); p=t.fast_info.last_price; print(f'RF_10Y={p/100:.4f}')" 2>/dev/null || echo "RF_FETCH_FAIL"`

Decision tree:

ConditionMethod path
YFIN_OKPath A (primary): yfinance for financials + peer multiples
YFIN_MISSING but FUNDA_CLI_MISSING is not setPath B: delegate to finance-data-providers:funda-data skill for fundamentals
Both missingPath C: pip-install yfinance, then Path A. python3 -m pip install -q yfinance numpy pandas
RF_FETCH_FAILUse default rf = 0.045 and note stale risk-free rate in output

If RF_10Y= printed, use that value as rf in Step 4d instead of the hardcoded 4.5%.


Step 2: Choose Methods & Set Defaults

Method applicability

Company typeDCFRelativeSOTPFallback
Mature cash-flow (CPG, telecom, utilities)✅ primary
High-growth SaaS / software✅ with care✅ primaryUse EV/Revenue + Rule of 40
Multi-segment conglomerate✅ primarySee references/sotp.md
Banks / insurance✅ (P/B, P/TBV)DDM or excess return; note in output
Pre-revenueEV/Revenue onlyFlag low confidence
REITs✅ (P/FFO, P/AFFO)NAV-based
Cyclicals (energy, semis, industrials)✅ on mid-cyclesometimesNormalize through-cycle

Defaults table

Every parameter below MUST have a value before moving to Step 3. Use these unless the user overrides.

ParameterDefaultRationale
Projection horizon5 yearsStandard explicit forecast window
Terminal growth g2.5%~ long-run US GDP
Risk-free rate rfLive 10Y UST from Step 1, else 4.5%Current cost of capital anchor
Equity risk premium erp5.5%Damodaran mid-range
Betainfo['beta'] from yfinanceMarket-observed levered beta
Cost of debt kdinterest_expense / total_debt, else 5.5%Effective rate; fallback to IG spread
Tax rate3-yr median effective rate, floored 15%, capped 30%Strips out one-offs
Margin assumptions3-yr median of each ratioSmooths cyclical noise
SBC treatmentCash for software/SaaS; non-cash for industrials/CPGIndustry convention
Peer count4-6Balances signal vs noise
Peer multipleMedian (not mean)Robust to outliers
Method weights (no SOTP)DCF 50% / Relative 50%Equal triangulation
Method weights (with SOTP)DCF 40% / Relative 30% / SOTP 30%SOTP gets weight when applicable
Sensitivity gridWACC ±1% in 0.5% steps × g from 1.5-3.5% in 0.5%5×5 matrix

See references/wacc_erp_rates.md for current risk-free rates, ERP tables, and sector WACC benchmarks.


Step 3: Pull Data

import yfinance as yf
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

TICKER = "AAPL"  # replace
t = yf.Ticker(TICKER)

info       = t.info
income_a   = t.income_stmt
cashflow_a = t.cashflow
balance_a  = t.balance_sheet
income_q   = t.quarterly_income_stmt
cashflow_q = t.quarterly_cashflow

earnings_est = t.earnings_estimate
revenue_est  = t.revenue_estimate

price       = info.get("currentPrice") or info.get("regularMarketPrice")
market_cap  = info.get("marketCap")
shares_out  = info.get("sharesOutstanding")
total_debt  = info.get("totalDebt") or 0
cash        = info.get("totalCash") or 0
beta        = info.get("beta") or 1.0
sector      = info.get("sector")
industry    = info.get("industry")

Key financial statement rows (yfinance labels):

NeedRow
RevenueTotal Revenue
EBITOperating Income
Net incomeNet Income
D&ADepreciation And Amortization (in cashflow)
CapExCapital Expenditure (negative)
ΔNWCChange In Working Capital (cashflow)
SBCStock Based Compensation (cashflow)

Step 4: DCF Build

Full methodology + industry-specific tweaks in references/dcf.md. Quick skeleton:

# 4a. Revenue growth path — fade from Y1 (consensus or hist CAGR) to terminal g
hist_cagr = (rev[-1] / rev[0]) ** (1 / (len(rev)-1)) - 1
y1 = float(revenue_est.loc["+1y", "growth"]) if "+1y" in revenue_est.index else hist_cagr
g_terminal = 0.025
growth_path = np.linspace(y1, g_terminal + 0.01, 5)

# 4b. Margins — 3y median
ebit_margin = float((income_a.loc["Operating Income"] / income_a.loc["Total Revenue"]).iloc[:3].median())
da_pct      = float((cashflow_a.loc["Depreciation And Amortization"] / income_a.loc["Total Revenue"]).iloc[:3].median())
capex_pct   = float((cashflow_a.loc["Capital Expenditure"].abs() / income_a.loc["Total Revenue"]).iloc[:3].median())
nwc_pct     = float((cashflow_a.loc["Change In Working Capital"].abs() / income_a.loc["Total Revenue"]).iloc[:3].median())
tax_rate    = max(0.15, min(0.30, 0.21))  # use effective if available

# 4c. FCFF per year
rev_t = [float(income_a.loc["Total Revenue"].iloc[0])]
fcff  = []
for g in growth_path:
    rev_t.append(rev_t[-1] * (1 + g))
    ebit = rev_t[-1] * ebit_margin
    nopat = ebit * (1 - tax_rate)
    fcff.append(nopat + rev_t[-1]*da_pct - rev_t[-1]*capex_pct - rev_t[-1]*nwc_pct)

# 4d. WACC
rf, erp, kd = 0.045, 0.055, 0.055  # override rf with live value from Step 1
ke = rf + beta * erp
e_v = market_cap / (market_cap + total_debt)
d_v = 1 - e_v
wacc = e_v*ke + d_v*kd*(1 - tax_rate)

# 4e. Terminal value — compute both, use midpoint
tv_gordon = fcff[-1] * (1 + g_terminal) / (wacc - g_terminal)
tv_exit   = (rev_t[-1] * ebit_margin + rev_t[-1] * da_pct) * 15  # peer median EV/EBITDA
tv_base   = 0.5 * (tv_gordon + tv_exit)

# 4f. Bridge to equity
pv_fcff = sum(f / (1+wacc)**(i+1) for i, f in enumerate(fcff))
pv_tv   = tv_base / (1+wacc)**5
ev      = pv_fcff + pv_tv
equity  = ev + cash - total_debt
implied_price_dcf = equity / shares_out

Gates: (a) if wacc <= g_terminal → stop, g too aggressive; (b) if pv_tv / ev > 0.85 or < 0.45 → flag and show both TV methods; (c) if wacc is outside the sector sanity band in references/wacc_erp_rates.md → note.


Step 5: Relative Valuation

Select 4-6 peers. Peer map and adjustment rules in references/relative_valuation.md.

PEERS = ["MSFT", "ORCL", "CRM", "NOW", "SAP", "WDAY"]  # pick by industry
multiples = {}
for p in PEERS:
    pi = yf.Ticker(p).info
    multiples[p] = {
        "pe_fwd": pi.get("forwardPE"),
        "ev_rev": pi.get("enterpriseToRevenue"),
        "ev_ebitda": pi.get("enterpriseToEbitda"),
        "ps": pi.get("priceToSalesTrailing12Months"),
    }
med_pe     = np.nanmedian([v["pe_fwd"] for v in multiples.values()])
med_ev_rev = np.nanmedian([v["ev_rev"] for v in multiples.values()])
med_ev_eb  = np.nanmedian([v["ev_ebitda"] for v in multiples.values()])

eps_ttm    = float(income_q.loc["Diluted EPS"].iloc[:4].sum())
rev_ttm    = float(income_q.loc["Total Revenue"].iloc[:4].sum())
ebitda_ttm = float(income_q.loc["EBIT"].iloc[:4].sum()) + float(cashflow_q.loc["Depreciation And Amortization"].iloc[:4].sum())
net_debt   = total_debt - cash

implied_pe       = med_pe * eps_ttm
implied_ev_rev   = (med_ev_rev * rev_ttm - net_debt) / shares_out
implied_ev_ebit  = (med_ev_eb  * ebitda_ttm - net_debt) / shares_out
implied_price_rel = np.nanmedian([implied_pe, implied_ev_rev, implied_ev_ebit])

Adjust peer median ±10-30% if target's growth or margin profile diverges materially. Always state the adjustment and reason. Rule of 40 anchor for SaaS in references/relative_valuation.md.


Step 6: SOTP (multi-segment only)

Skip unless the 10-K reports 2+ operating segments with distinct economics. yfinance does NOT expose segment data — user must supply or parse from filings. Full methodology in references/sotp.md:

  • Identify segments + pure-play peer for each
  • Apply peer median EV/EBITDA (or EV/Rev for growth segments)
  • Subtract unallocated corporate costs (cap 2-5% of revenue if unknown)
  • Subtract net debt, minority interest; divide by shares

SOTP discount = (SOTP price − market price) / SOTP price. Flag if >20% (conglomerate discount).


Step 7: Triangulate, Sensitivity, Scenarios

# Blended implied price
if sotp_price is None:
    blended = 0.5*implied_price_dcf + 0.5*implied_price_rel
else:
    blended = 0.4*implied_price_dcf + 0.3*implied_price_rel + 0.3*sotp_price

# 5x5 sensitivity grid
wacc_grid = [wacc + dx for dx in (-0.01, -0.005, 0, 0.005, 0.01)]
g_grid    = [0.015, 0.020, 0.025, 0.030, 0.035]
sens = {}
for w in wacc_grid:
    for g in g_grid:
        tv = fcff[-1]*(1+g)/(w-g)
        pv = sum(f/(1+w)**(i+1) for i,f in enumerate(fcff)) + tv/(1+w)**5
        sens[(w,g)] = (pv + cash - total_debt) / shares_out

Also produce Bull / Base / Bear: shift revenue growth ±300bps, EBIT margin ±200bps, WACC ∓100bps, terminal g 3.0% / 2.5% / 1.5%.


Step 8: Respond to the User

Output in this order:

  1. Headline verdict — one sentence: blended fair value, vs. current, % upside/downside, most bullish/bearish method. Example: "AAPL fair value ≈ $215 (blended), vs. current $198 → ~9% upside; DCF is most bullish at $228."
  2. Snapshot — sector, industry, market cap, current price, 3M / 12M price change, LTM revenue growth.
  3. Three-method summary — 3-column table: method | implied price | weight | brief rationale.
  4. DCF build — assumptions table (growth path, margins, WACC components, terminal method) + 5-yr FCFF projection table + EV-to-equity bridge.
  5. Peer comparison — table of peers with P/E fwd, EV/Rev, EV/EBITDA, gross margin, rev growth; bottom row = median; flag target's premium/discount.
  6. SOTP (if applicable) — segment table + adjustments + equity value.
  7. Sensitivity matrix — WACC × g grid (5×5), base case highlighted.
  8. Scenarios — Bull / Base / Bear table with levers + implied price.
  9. Key risks — 3-5 bullets: which assumption moves the answer most; what could break the thesis.

Error handling

Missing / edge caseAction
yfinance returns None for betaUse sector-default beta from references/wacc_erp_rates.md
Negative LTM EBITDASkip EV/EBITDA multiple; rely on EV/Revenue + DCF
Negative LTM EPSSkip P/E multiple; use forward P/E if positive, else skip
Growth > WACC in GordonCap g = wacc − 0.5% and flag
Fewer than 3 years historyUse what's available; flag data confidence as "low"
Peer data fetch failsDrop that peer from median; note in output
No segment data for SOTPSkip Section 6; proceed with DCF + Relative only

Caveats to include

  • TTM data lags real-time; peer multiples reflect market sentiment (can overshoot)
  • DCF is garbage-in/garbage-out; sensitivity matters more than a point estimate
  • yfinance data is unofficial; cross-check any decision with primary filings
  • Not financial advice

Reference Files

  • references/dcf.md — DCF methodology + industry-specific guidance (software, retail, financials, healthcare, energy, manufacturing, CPG, telecom, REITs, streaming)
  • references/relative_valuation.md — Peer selection, multiple adjustment rules, Rule of 40, peer sets by theme
  • references/sotp.md — Sum-of-parts methodology, conglomerate discount detection, catalysts
  • references/wacc_erp_rates.md — Risk-free rates, equity risk premiums, sector WACC benchmarks, sector-default betas

Company Valuation

Estimate the intrinsic value of a public company via DCF, relative (peer multiple), and sum-of-parts (SOTP) methods, and blend into a triangulated implied share price with sensitivity tables.

What it does

  • Pulls 5 years of financials + analyst estimates via yfinance
  • Builds a 5-year DCF with explicit revenue / margin / WACC / terminal-value assumptions
  • Applies peer median P/E, EV/Revenue, EV/EBITDA multiples across 4-6 peers
  • Runs SOTP when the company has 2+ distinct reporting segments
  • Presents a blended implied price with method weights, WACC × g sensitivity matrix, and Bull/Base/Bear scenarios
  • Handles banks/REITs/pre-revenue/cyclical edge cases with appropriate fallbacks

Triggers

what is AAPL worth, valuation of NVDA, fair value of TSLA, DCF for MSFT, build a DCF, intrinsic value, implied share price, is X overvalued/undervalued, relative valuation, EV/EBITDA target, SOTP, sum of the parts, price target from fundamentals, value this company

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.8+
  • yfinance, numpy, pandas (auto-installed if missing)

Optional: finance-data-providers:funda-data skill as a fallback data source.

Platform

CLI-based agents (Claude Code). Requires shell + pip.

Setup

No authentication required. First run will auto-install dependencies.

Reference Files

  • references/dcf.md — DCF methodology, industry-specific guidance (software, retail, financials, healthcare, energy, manufacturing, CPG, telecom, REITs, streaming), common pitfalls
  • references/relative_valuation.md — Peer selection heuristics, multiple adjustment rules, Rule of 40 for SaaS, default peer sets by theme
  • references/sotp.md — Sum-of-parts methodology, conglomerate discount detection, catalyst framework, position sizing
  • references/wacc_erp_rates.md — Risk-free rates (live + default), equity risk premiums, sector WACC bands, sector-default betas, terminal growth ceilings

Output

Structured briefing with: headline verdict, snapshot, three-method summary, DCF build, peer comparison, SOTP (if applicable), sensitivity matrix, scenarios, key risks, and caveats.

Disclaimer

For research and educational purposes only. Not financial advice.

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数1.5K
評価4.3 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年7月31日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.3(120)
5
37%
4
43%
3
13%
2
5%
1
2%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🤖claude-code

タイムライン

作成2026年7月26日
最終更新2026年7月31日
🎁 Agent 知識カード
アンケート