project-flow-ops
GitHub Issues、PR、Linearタスクを統合し、プロジェクトのコラボレーションワークフローを統一し、タスクを自動割り当てし、進捗を追跡します。
npx skills add affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill project-flow-opsBefore / After 効果比較
1 组GitHubとLinearを手動で切り替え、タスク情報をコピー&ペーストするため、PRの関連付けやタスクの依存関係を見落としがちです。要件からリリースまで、機能ごとに何度も手動でステータスを同期する必要があります。
GitHubとLinear間のタスクステータスを自動同期し、タスクの割り当てと優先順位付けをインテリジェントに推奨します。リアルタイムで開発の進捗とボトルネックを表示し、ワンクリックで実行レポートを生成します。
project-flow-ops
Project Flow Ops
This skill turns disconnected GitHub issues, PRs, and Linear tasks into one execution flow.
Use it when the problem is coordination, not coding.
When to Use
-
Triage open PR or issue backlogs
-
Decide what belongs in Linear vs what should remain GitHub-only
-
Link active GitHub work to internal execution lanes
-
Classify PRs into merge, port/rebuild, close, or park
-
Audit whether review comments, CI failures, or stale issues are blocking execution
Operating Model
-
GitHub is the public and community truth
-
Linear is the internal execution truth for active scheduled work
-
Not every GitHub issue needs a Linear issue
-
Create or update Linear only when the work is:
active
-
delegated
-
scheduled
-
cross-functional
-
important enough to track internally
Core Workflow
1. Read the public surface first
Gather:
-
GitHub issue or PR state
-
author and branch status
-
review comments
-
CI status
-
linked issues
2. Classify the work
Every item should end up in one of these states:
State Meaning
Merge self-contained, policy-compliant, ready
Port/Rebuild useful idea, but should be manually re-landed inside ECC
Close wrong direction, stale, unsafe, or duplicated
Park potentially useful, but not scheduled now
3. Decide whether Linear is warranted
Create or update Linear only if:
-
execution is actively planned
-
multiple repos or workstreams are involved
-
the work needs internal ownership or sequencing
-
the issue is part of a larger program lane
Do not mirror everything mechanically.
4. Keep the two systems consistent
When work is active:
-
GitHub issue/PR should say what is happening publicly
-
Linear should track owner, priority, and execution lane internally
When work ships or is rejected:
-
post the public resolution back to GitHub
-
mark the Linear task accordingly
Review Rules
-
Never merge from title, summary, or trust alone; use the full diff
-
External-source features should be rebuilt inside ECC when they are valuable but not self-contained
-
CI red means classify and fix or block; do not pretend it is merge-ready
-
If the real blocker is product direction, say so instead of hiding behind tooling
Output Format
Return:
PUBLIC STATUS
- issue / PR state
- CI / review state
CLASSIFICATION
- merge / port-rebuild / close / park
- one-paragraph rationale
LINEAR ACTION
- create / update / no Linear item needed
- project / lane if applicable
NEXT OPERATOR ACTION
- exact next move
Good Use Cases
-
"Audit the open PR backlog and tell me what to merge vs rebuild"
-
"Map GitHub issues into our ECC 1.x and ECC 2.0 program lanes"
-
"Check whether this needs a Linear issue or should stay GitHub-only"
Weekly Installs547Repositoryaffaan-m/everyt…ude-codeGitHub Stars152.8KFirst Seen12 days agoSecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarnInstalled oncodex509opencode485antigravity480gemini-cli480cursor480kimi-cli479
ユーザーレビュー (0)
レビューを書く
レビューなし
統計データ
ユーザー評価
この Skill を評価