P

product-lens

by @affaan-mv
4.4(20)

Laravelプロジェクト検証プロセス。PR前とデプロイ前に完全なコードチェック、テスト、セキュリティスキャンを実行し、コード品質を保証。

laravelcode-reviewtest-automationsecurityquality-assuranceGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill product-lens
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1 组
使用前

開発者はPintコードフォーマット、PHPStan静的解析、Pest単体テストを手動で実行し、手順の漏れにより低品質なコードがマージされ、デプロイ後に互換性の問題が発見され緊急ロールバックが必要となり、検証プロセス全体が時間と手間がかかり、エラーが発生しやすい。

使用後

完全な lint → test → security → dependency チェックチェーンをワンクリックで実行し、詳細なレポートを自動生成して不合格コードをブロックします。5分で全量検証が完了し、コード品質が40%向上し、デプロイ後の緊急ロールバックが85%削減されます。

SKILL.md

product-lens

Product Lens — Think Before You Build

This lane owns product diagnosis, not implementation-ready specification writing.

If the user needs a durable PRD-to-SRS or capability-contract artifact, hand off to product-capability.

When to Use

  • Before starting any feature — validate the "why"

  • Weekly product review — are we building the right thing?

  • When stuck choosing between features

  • Before a launch — sanity check the user journey

  • When converting a vague idea into a product brief before engineering planning starts

How It Works

Mode 1: Product Diagnostic

Like YC office hours but automated. Asks the hard questions:

1. Who is this for? (specific person, not "developers")
2. What's the pain? (quantify: how often, how bad, what do they do today?)
3. Why now? (what changed that makes this possible/necessary?)
4. What's the 10-star version? (if money/time were unlimited)
5. What's the MVP? (smallest thing that proves the thesis)
6. What's the anti-goal? (what are you explicitly NOT building?)
7. How do you know it's working? (metric, not vibes)

Output: a PRODUCT-BRIEF.md with answers, risks, and a go/no-go recommendation.

If the result is "yes, build this," the next lane is product-capability, not more founder-theater.

Mode 2: Founder Review

Reviews your current project through a founder lens:

1. Read README, CLAUDE.md, package.json, recent commits
2. Infer: what is this trying to be?
3. Score: product-market fit signals (0-10)
   - Usage growth trajectory
   - Retention indicators (repeat contributors, return users)
   - Revenue signals (pricing page, billing code, Stripe integration)
   - Competitive moat (what's hard to copy?)
4. Identify: the one thing that would 10x this
5. Flag: things you're building that don't matter

Mode 3: User Journey Audit

Maps the actual user experience:

1. Clone/install the product as a new user
2. Document every friction point (confusing steps, errors, missing docs)
3. Time each step
4. Compare to competitor onboarding
5. Score: time-to-value (how long until the user gets their first win?)
6. Recommend: top 3 fixes for onboarding

Mode 4: Feature Prioritization

When you have 10 ideas and need to pick 2:

1. List all candidate features
2. Score each on: impact (1-5) × confidence (1-5) ÷ effort (1-5)
3. Rank by ICE score
4. Apply constraints: runway, team size, dependencies
5. Output: prioritized roadmap with rationale

Output

All modes output actionable docs, not essays. Every recommendation has a specific next step.

Integration

Pair with:

  • /browser-qa to verify the user journey audit findings

  • /design-system audit for visual polish assessment

  • /canary-watch for post-launch monitoring

  • product-capability when the product brief needs to become an implementation-ready capability plan

Weekly Installs500Repositoryaffaan-m/everyt…ude-codeGitHub Stars144.9KFirst Seen10 days agoSecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled oncodex465opencode443cursor438github-copilot437antigravity437gemini-cli436

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数4.6K
評価4.4 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年8月8日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.4(20)
5
50%
4
50%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🔧Claude Code

タイムライン

作成2026年4月9日
最終更新2026年8月8日
🎁 Agent 知識カード
アンケート