C

customer-billing-ops

by @affaan-mv
4.4(9)

顧客の請求問題を迅速に診断し、請求履歴と取引記録を自動分析し、安全な修正案とフォローアップメッセージを生成します。

financeautomationcustomer-supportGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill customer-billing-ops
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1
使用前

複数のシステムやデータベースを手動で照会し、顧客の請求履歴と取引記録を結合します。問題の根本原因を分析するには複数のツールを切り替える必要があり、複雑な請求紛争の原因特定には45分かかります。

使用後

顧客識別子を入力すると、関連するすべての請求データが自動的に集約され、異常な取引と請求ロジックがインテリジェントに分析され、5分で問題診断レポートと修正提案が生成されます。

SKILL.md

customer-billing-ops

Customer Billing Ops

Use this skill for real customer operations, not generic payment API design.

The goal is to help the operator answer: who is this customer, what happened, what is the safest fix, and what follow-up should we send?

When to Use

  • Customer says billing is broken, they want a refund, or they cannot cancel

  • Investigating duplicate subscriptions, accidental charges, failed renewals, or churn risk

  • Reviewing plan mix, active subscriptions, yearly vs monthly conversion, or team-seat confusion

  • Creating or validating a billing portal flow

  • Auditing support complaints that touch subscriptions, invoices, refunds, or payment methods

Preferred Tool Surface

  • Use connected billing tools such as Stripe first

  • Use email, GitHub, or issue trackers only as supporting evidence

  • Prefer hosted billing/customer portals over custom account-management code when the platform already provides the needed controls

Guardrails

  • Never expose secret keys, full card details, or unnecessary customer PII in the response

  • Do not refund blindly; first classify the issue

  • Distinguish among:

accidental duplicate purchase

  • deliberate multi-seat or team purchase

  • broken product / unmet value

  • failed or incomplete checkout

  • cancellation due to missing self-serve controls

  • For annual plans, team plans, and prorated states, verify the contract shape before taking action

Workflow

1. Identify the customer cleanly

Start from the strongest identifier available:

  • customer email

  • Stripe customer ID

  • subscription ID

  • invoice ID

  • GitHub username or support email if it is known to map back to billing

Return a concise identity summary:

  • customer

  • active subscriptions

  • canceled subscriptions

  • invoices

  • obvious anomalies such as duplicate active subscriptions

2. Classify the issue

Put the case into one bucket before acting:

Case Typical action

Duplicate personal subscription cancel extras, consider refund

Real multi-seat/team intent preserve seats, clarify billing model

Failed payment / incomplete checkout recover via portal or update payment method

Missing self-serve controls provide portal, cancellation path, or invoice access

Product failure or trust break refund, apologize, log product issue

3. Take the safest reversible action first

Preferred order:

  • restore self-serve management

  • fix duplicate or broken billing state

  • refund only the affected charge or duplicate

  • document the reason

  • send a short customer follow-up

If the fix requires product work, separate:

  • customer remediation now

  • product bug / workflow gap for backlog

4. Check operator-side product gaps

If the customer pain comes from a missing operator surface, call it out explicitly. Common examples:

  • no billing portal

  • no usage/rate-limit visibility

  • no plan/seat explanation

  • no cancellation flow

  • no duplicate-subscription guard

Treat those as ECC or website follow-up items, not just support incidents.

5. Produce the operator handoff

End with:

  • customer state summary

  • action taken

  • revenue impact

  • follow-up text to send

  • product or backlog issue to create

Output Format

Use this structure:

CUSTOMER
- name / email
- relevant account identifiers

BILLING STATE
- active subscriptions
- invoice or renewal state
- anomalies

DECISION
- issue classification
- why this action is correct

ACTION TAKEN
- refund / cancel / portal / no-op

FOLLOW-UP
- short customer message

PRODUCT GAP
- what should be fixed in the product or website

Examples of Good Recommendations

  • "The right fix is a billing portal, not a custom dashboard yet"

  • "This looks like duplicate personal checkout, not a real team-seat purchase"

  • "Refund one duplicate charge, keep the remaining active subscription, then convert the customer to org billing later if needed"

Weekly Installs551Repositoryaffaan-m/everyt…ude-codeGitHub Stars152.8KFirst Seen12 days agoSecurity AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykWarnInstalled oncodex513opencode489gemini-cli484antigravity484cursor484cline483

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数2.7K
評価4.4 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年5月22日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.4(9)
5
56%
4
33%
3
11%
2
0%
1
0%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🔧Claude Code

タイムライン

作成2026年4月14日
最終更新2026年5月22日