A

azure-compute

by @microsoftv
4.9(1,912)

ワークロードタイプ、パフォーマンス、スケーリング要件、予算に基づいてAzure VMサイズ、VMSS、および構成を推奨し、Azureコンピューティングリソースの使用を最適化します。

deploymentci-cdazurecomputeGitHub
インストール方法
npx skills add microsoft/github-copilot-for-azure --skill azure-compute
compare_arrows

Before / After 効果比較

1
使用前

Azureに新しいWebアプリケーションをデプロイする予定ですが、多数のVMタイプと構成があるため、どの組み合わせが最高のパフォーマンスとコスト効率を提供できるか不明で、リソースの無駄やパフォーマンス不足を懸念しています。

使用後

Azure Computeスキルを活用することで、ワークロードの種類、パフォーマンス要件、予算に基づいて、Azure VMとVM Scale Sets (VMSS) の詳細な推奨事項を得られました。現在、最適なコンピューティングリソースを選択でき、アプリケーションの高性能な実行を確保しつつ、コストを効果的に管理しています。

SKILL.md

azure-compute

Azure Compute Skill

Recommend Azure VM sizes, VM Scale Sets (VMSS), and configurations by analyzing workload type, performance requirements, scaling needs, and budget. No Azure subscription required — all data comes from public Microsoft documentation and the unauthenticated Retail Prices API.

When to Use This Skill

  • User asks which Azure VM or VMSS to choose for a workload

  • User needs VM size recommendations for web, database, ML, batch, HPC, or other workloads

  • User wants to compare VM families, sizes, or pricing tiers

  • User asks about trade-offs between VM options (cost vs performance)

  • User needs a cost estimate for Azure VMs without an Azure account

  • User asks whether to use a single VM or a scale set

  • User needs autoscaling, high availability, or load-balanced VM recommendations

  • User asks about VMSS orchestration modes (Flexible vs Uniform)

Workflow

Use reference files for initial filtering

CRITICAL: then always verify with live documentation from learn.microsoft.com before making final recommendations. If web_fetch fails, use reference files as fallback but warn the user the information may be stale.

Step 1: Gather Requirements

Ask the user for (infer when possible):

Requirement Examples

Workload type Web server, relational DB, ML training, batch processing, dev/test

vCPU / RAM needs "4 cores, 16 GB RAM" or "lightweight" / "heavy"

GPU needed? Yes → GPU families; No → general/compute/memory

Storage needs High IOPS, large temp disk, premium SSD

Budget priority Cost-sensitive, performance-first, balanced

OS Linux or Windows (affects pricing)

Region Affects availability and price

Instance count Single instance, fixed count, or variable/dynamic

Scaling needs None, manual scaling, autoscale based on metrics or schedule

Availability needs Best-effort, fault-domain isolation, cross-zone HA

Load balancing Not needed, Azure Load Balancer (L4), Application Gateway (L7)

Step 2: Determine VM vs VMSS

Workflow:

  • Review VMSS Guide to understand when VMSS vs single VM is appropriate

  • Use the gathered requirements to decide which approach fits best

  • REQUIRED: If recommending VMSS, fetch current documentation to verify capabilities:

web_fetch https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machine-scale-sets/overview
web_fetch https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machine-scale-sets/virtual-machine-scale-sets-autoscale-overview

  • If web_fetch fails, proceed with reference file guidance but include this warning:

Unable to verify against latest Azure documentation. Recommendation based on reference material that may not reflect recent updates.

Needs autoscaling?
├─ Yes → VMSS
├─ No
│  ├─ Multiple identical instances needed?
│  │  ├─ Yes → VMSS
│  │  └─ No
│  │     ├─ High availability across fault domains / zones?
│  │     │  ├─ Yes, many instances → VMSS
│  │     │  └─ Yes, 1-2 instances → VM + Availability Zone
│  │     └─ Single instance sufficient? → VM

Signal Recommendation Why

Autoscale on CPU, memory, or schedule VMSS Built-in autoscale; no custom automation needed

Stateless web/API tier behind a load balancer VMSS Homogeneous fleet with automatic distribution

Batch / parallel processing across many nodes VMSS Scale out on demand, scale to zero when idle

Mixed VM sizes in one group VMSS (Flexible) Flexible orchestration supports mixed SKUs

Single long-lived server (jumpbox, AD DC) VM No scaling benefit; simpler management

Unique per-instance config required VM Scale sets assume homogeneous configuration

Stateful workload, tightly-coupled cluster VM (or VMSS case-by-case) Evaluate carefully; VMSS Flexible can work for some stateful patterns

Warning: If the user is unsure, default to single VM for simplicity. Recommend VMSS only when scaling, HA, or fleet management is clearly needed.

Step 3: Select VM Family

Workflow:

Review VM Family Guide to identify 2-3 candidate VM families that match the workload requirements

REQUIRED: verify specifications for your chosen candidates by fetching current documentation:

web_fetch https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/sizes/<family-category>/<series-name>

Examples:

B-series: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/sizes/general-purpose/b-family

  • D-series: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/sizes/general-purpose/ddsv5-series

  • GPU: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/sizes/gpu-accelerated/nc-family

If considering Spot VMs, also fetch:

web_fetch https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machine-scale-sets/use-spot

If web_fetch fails, proceed with reference file guidance but include this warning:

Unable to verify against latest Azure documentation. Recommendation based on reference material that may not reflect recent updates or limitations (e.g., Spot VM compatibility).

This step applies to both single VMs and VMSS since scale sets use the same VM SKUs.

Step 4: Look Up Pricing

Query the Azure Retail Prices API — Retail Prices API Guide

Tip: VMSS has no extra charge — pricing is per-VM instance. Use the same VM pricing from the API and multiply by the expected instance count to estimate VMSS cost. For autoscaling workloads, estimate cost at both the minimum and maximum instance count.

Step 5: Present Recommendations

Provide 2–3 options with trade-offs:

Column Purpose

Hosting Model VM or VMSS (with orchestration mode if VMSS)

VM Size ARM SKU name (e.g., Standard_D4s_v5)

vCPUs / RAM Core specs

Instance Count 1 for VM; min–max range for VMSS with autoscale

Estimated $/hr Per-instance pay-as-you-go from API

Why Fit for the workload

Trade-off What the user gives up

Tip: Always explain why a family fits and what the user trades off (cost vs cores, burstable vs dedicated, single VM simplicity vs VMSS scalability, etc.).

For VMSS recommendations, also mention:

  • Recommended orchestration mode (Flexible for most new workloads)

  • Autoscale strategy (metric-based, schedule-based, or both)

  • Load balancer type (Azure Load Balancer for L4, Application Gateway for L7/TLS)

Step 6: Offer Next Steps

Error Handling

Scenario Action

API returns empty results Broaden filters — check armRegionName, serviceName, armSkuName spelling

User unsure of workload type Ask clarifying questions; default to General Purpose D-series

Region not specified Use eastus as default; note prices vary by region

Unclear if VM or VMSS needed Ask about scaling and instance count; default to single VM if unsure

User asks VMSS pricing directly Use same VM pricing API — VMSS has no extra charge; multiply by instance count

References

Weekly Installs47.5KRepositorymicrosoft/githu…or-azureGitHub Stars157First SeenFeb 27, 2026Security AuditsGen Agent Trust HubPassSocketPassSnykPassInstalled ongithub-copilot47.4Kcodex278gemini-cli271opencode246kimi-cli241cursor241

ユーザーレビュー (0)

レビューを書く

効果
使いやすさ
ドキュメント
互換性

レビューなし

統計データ

インストール数254.6K
評価4.9 / 5.0
バージョン
更新日2026年5月23日
比較事例1 件

ユーザー評価

4.9(1,912)
5
60%
4
40%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%

この Skill を評価

0.0

対応プラットフォーム

🔧Claude Code
🔧OpenClaw
🔧OpenCode
🔧Codex
🔧Gemini CLI
🔧GitHub Copilot
🔧Amp
🔧Kimi CLI

タイムライン

作成2026年3月16日
最終更新2026年5月23日