--- id: sm-workflow-patterns name: "workflow-patterns" url: https://skills.yangsir.net/skill/sm-workflow-patterns author: wshobson domain: ai-agent-orchestration-collaboration tags: ["workflow-automation", "process-design", "devops", "ci/cd", "business-process-management"] install_count: 6600 rating: 4.50 (53 reviews) github: https://github.com/wshobson/agents --- # workflow-patterns > 理解并应用DevOps工作流模式，通过智能自动化和多智能体编排，提升开发运维效率和流程标准化。 **Stats**: 6,600 installs · 4.5/5 (53 reviews) ## Before / After 对比 ### 跨部门工作流效率对比 | Metric | Before | After | Change | |---|---|---|---| | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | - | | - | - | - | - | ## Readme # workflow-patterns # Workflow Patterns Guide for implementing tasks using Conductor's TDD workflow, managing phase checkpoints, handling git commits, and executing the verification protocol that ensures quality throughout implementation. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing tasks from a track's plan.md - Following TDD red-green-refactor cycle - Completing phase checkpoints - Managing git commits and notes - Understanding quality assurance gates - Handling verification protocols - Recording progress in plan files ## TDD Task Lifecycle Follow these 11 steps for each task: ### Step 1: Select Next Task Read plan.md and identify the next pending `[ ]` task. Select tasks in order within the current phase. Do not skip ahead to later phases. ### Step 2: Mark as In Progress Update plan.md to mark the task as `[~]`: ``` - [~] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation ``` Commit this status change separately from implementation. ### Step 3: RED - Write Failing Tests Write tests that define the expected behavior before writing implementation: - Create test file if needed - Write test cases covering happy path - Write test cases covering edge cases - Write test cases covering error conditions - Run tests - they should FAIL Example: ``` def test_validate_user_email_valid(): user = User(email="test@example.com") assert user.validate_email() is True def test_validate_user_email_invalid(): user = User(email="invalid") assert user.validate_email() is False ``` ### Step 4: GREEN - Implement Minimum Code Write the minimum code necessary to make tests pass: - Focus on making tests green, not perfection - Avoid premature optimization - Keep implementation simple - Run tests - they should PASS ### Step 5: REFACTOR - Improve Clarity With green tests, improve the code: - Extract common patterns - Improve naming - Remove duplication - Simplify logic - Run tests after each change - they should remain GREEN ### Step 6: Verify Coverage Check test coverage meets the 80% target: ``` pytest --cov=module --cov-report=term-missing ``` If coverage is below 80%: - Identify uncovered lines - Add tests for missing paths - Re-run coverage check ### Step 7: Document Deviations If implementation deviated from plan or introduced new dependencies: - Update tech-stack.md with new dependencies - Note deviations in plan.md task comments - Update spec.md if requirements changed ### Step 8: Commit Implementation Create a focused commit for the task: ``` git add -A git commit -m "feat(user): implement email validation - Add validate_email method to User class - Handle empty and malformed emails - Add comprehensive test coverage Task: 2.1 Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` Commit message format: - Type: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore - Scope: affected module or component - Summary: imperative, present tense - Body: bullet points of changes - Footer: task and track references ### Step 9: Attach Git Notes Add rich task summary as git note: ``` git notes add -m "Task 2.1: Implement user validation Summary: - Added email validation using regex pattern - Handles edge cases: empty, no @, no domain - Coverage: 94% on validation module Files changed: - src/models/user.py (modified) - tests/test_user.py (modified) Decisions: - Used simple regex over email-validator library - Reason: No external dependency for basic validation" ``` ### Step 10: Update Plan with SHA Update plan.md to mark task complete with commit SHA: ``` - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation `abc1234` ``` ### Step 11: Commit Plan Update Commit the plan status update: ``` git add conductor/tracks/*/plan.md git commit -m "docs: update plan - task 2.1 complete Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` ## Phase Completion Protocol When all tasks in a phase are complete, execute the verification protocol: ### Identify Changed Files List all files modified since the last checkpoint: ``` git diff --name-only ..HEAD ``` ### Ensure Test Coverage For each modified file: - Identify corresponding test file - Verify tests exist for new/changed code - Run coverage for modified modules - Add tests if coverage < 80% ### Run Full Test Suite Execute complete test suite: ``` pytest -v --tb=short ``` All tests must pass before proceeding. ### Generate Manual Verification Steps Create checklist of manual verifications: ``` ## Phase 1 Verification Checklist - [ ] User can register with valid email - [ ] Invalid email shows appropriate error - [ ] Database stores user correctly - [ ] API returns expected response codes ``` ### WAIT for User Approval Present verification checklist to user: ``` Phase 1 complete. Please verify: 1. [ ] Test suite passes (automated) 2. [ ] Coverage meets target (automated) 3. [ ] Manual verification items (requires human) Respond with 'approved' to continue, or note issues. ``` Do NOT proceed without explicit approval. ### Create Checkpoint Commit After approval, create checkpoint commit: ``` git add -A git commit -m "checkpoint: phase 1 complete - user-auth_20250115 Verified: - All tests passing - Coverage: 87% - Manual verification approved Phase 1 tasks: - [x] Task 1.1: Setup database schema - [x] Task 1.2: Implement user model - [x] Task 1.3: Add validation logic" ``` ### Record Checkpoint SHA Update plan.md checkpoints table: ``` ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---------- | -------- | | Phase 1 | def5678 | 2025-01-15 | verified | | Phase 2 | | | pending | ``` ## Quality Assurance Gates Before marking any task complete, verify these gates: ### Passing Tests - All existing tests pass - New tests pass - No test regressions ### Coverage >= 80% - New code has 80%+ coverage - Overall project coverage maintained - Critical paths fully covered ### Style Compliance - Code follows style guides - Linting passes - Formatting correct ### Documentation - Public APIs documented - Complex logic explained - README updated if needed ### Type Safety - Type hints present (if applicable) - Type checker passes - No type: ignore without reason ### No Linting Errors - Zero linter errors - Warnings addressed or justified - Static analysis clean ### Mobile Compatibility If applicable: - Responsive design verified - Touch interactions work - Performance acceptable ### Security Audit - No secrets in code - Input validation present - Authentication/authorization correct - Dependencies vulnerability-free ## Git Integration ### Commit Message Format ``` ():